Prosthetic Fit Assessment in Transtibial Amputees Secondary to Trauma (ProFit)

Prosthetic Fit Assessment in Transtibial Amputees Secondary to Trauma (ProFit)

The aims of this study address an exploratory endpoint in the Major Extremity Trauma Research Consortium (METRC) Transtibial Amputation Outcomes Study (TAOS; NCT01821976) that is investigating prosthesis fit, alignment and condition of the residual limb. As there are no validated measures of fit and alignment (factors known to impact comfort, function and performance among amputees) the TAOS study includes a provision in the protocol for acquisition of photographs, video and radiographs in order to help develop uniform assessments of the residual limb. The goal of the ProFit study is to validate and refine the prosthetic assessment tool (ProFit) that was developed by an expert panel of certified orthotist prosthetistis (CPOs) in collaboration with orthopaedic trauma investigators, a measurement scientist and a biomedical engineer from the BADER consortium.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Detailed Description

Specific Aim 1: To test the reliability of the ProFit.

Patients enrolled in the TAOS trial returning for their eighteen month final visit will undergo radiographic, video, and photographic assessment. A blinded prosthetist panel (PP) will view these remotely and complete a 42 item assessment based on x-ray, photo and video. We will examine two aspects of reliability for the ProFit, inter-rater reliability and internal consistency.

Specific Aim 2: To examine the validity and responsiveness of the ProFit.

This study aims to examine the validity of the ProFit by specifically evaluating factor validity, construct validity and discriminant validity. This will be accomplished by correlating ProFit scores with measures of self-reported pain (Brief Pain Inventory), function (Short Musculoskeletal Functional Assessment), and satisfaction (Orthotics and Prosthetics User's Survey). Moreover, a subset of subjects will undergo quantitative measurement of fit and alignment using a novel prosthesis-mounted socket reaction moment sensor. Responsiveness of the ProFit will be based on repeated measurements at 6 and 18 months.

Specific Aim 3: To develop a shorter version of the ProFit.

Based on findings from Aim 1 and 2 at the individual item level, we will remove items that: 1) have poor inter-rater agreement; 2) demonstrate weak relationships with clinician and patient report of overall fit; or 3) exhibit strong ceiling or floor effects.

Study design: The ProFit study is a prospective validation study of an assessment of prosthetic fit and alignment among patients with a transtibial amputation.

Study duration: 3 years Sample size: 120 TAOS patients will provide adequate power to detect important differences in fit and alignment 18 months following amputation. A subset of 60 patients is necessary to detect significant differences in alignment using the Smart Pyramid.

Number of study sites: Up to 35 centers including 24 Core METRC sites, 4 MTFs, and 7 METRC satellite sites.

Study population: Patients enrolled in the METRC TAOS study.

Outcome measure: This ancillary project to the TAOS trial is designed to study the validity reliability and validity of the ProFit, a 42-item tool for assessing prosthetic fit and alignment among patients with a transtibial amputation.

Statistical analysis: Inter-rater reliability and internal consistency will be examined to test the reliability of the ProFit. The validity of this assessment will be evaluated using a variety of construct validity tests. Based on findings from the reliability and validity analysis, a shorter version of the ProFit will be developed. The performance of the shorter version will be determined based on correlation with the original assessment.

Randomization: Not applicable

Safety monitoring: Not applicable

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

33

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • California
      • San Francisco, California, United States, 94110
        • University of California at San Francisco
    • Florida
      • Tampa, Florida, United States, 33606
        • Tampa General Hospital
    • Maryland
      • Baltimore, Maryland, United States, 20742
        • University of Maryland, R Adams Cowley Shock Trauma Center
    • Mississippi
      • Jackson, Mississippi, United States, 39216
        • University of Mississippi Medical Center
    • North Carolina
      • Charlotte, North Carolina, United States, 28204
        • Carolinas Medical Center
      • Winston-Salem, North Carolina, United States, 27157
        • Wake Forest University Baptist Center
    • Ohio
      • Cleveland, Ohio, United States, 44109
        • MetroHealth Medical Center
    • Tennessee
      • Nashville, Tennessee, United States, 37232
        • Vanderbilt University
    • Texas
      • Houston, Texas, United States, 78229
        • The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston Medical School
      • San Antonio, Texas, United States, 78234
        • San Antonio Military Medical Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 60 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Participants will be drawn from the TAOS study which enrolls patients with below the knee amputations from trauma centers participating in the Major Extremity Research Consortium (METRC).

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Must be enrolled in the TAOS study

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients weighing <300 lbs.
  • Patient requires an LAR
  • Women who are breastfeeding or pregnant

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Prosthetic Fit and Alignment
Time Frame: 18 months
A panel of CPOs will evaluate prosthetic fit and alignment using a 42 item assessment tool.
18 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Reliability of ProFit assessment tool
Time Frame: 18 months
18 months
Validity of ProFit Assessment tool
Time Frame: 18 months
18 months
Responsiveness of ProFit Assessment tool
Time Frame: 18 months
18 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: Lisa Reider, PhD, Major Extremity Trauma Research Consortium

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

January 1, 2015

Primary Completion (Actual)

January 1, 2021

Study Completion (Actual)

January 1, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 25, 2015

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 1, 2015

First Posted (Estimate)

September 4, 2015

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 24, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 23, 2021

Last Verified

July 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • OR130357

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Traumatic Amputation of Lower Extremity

3
Subscribe