Personalized Needs in Clostridium Difficile Infections (SPECIFY)

October 3, 2017 updated by: Evangelos J. Giamarellos-Bourboulis, M.D., University of Athens

Scoring Personalized Needs in Clostridium Difficile Infections for Fidaxomixin Therapy

To develop a score that can predict early from diagnosis of Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) the risk for relapse and of unfavorable outcome. This score can be used in the future to identify patients will benefit from fidaxomicin treatment.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Medical world is nowadays witnessing a sudden increase of the incidence of infections by Clostridium difficile (DCI). This is due in part to the prolongation of survival of patients with major comorbidities like solid tumor malignancies and lymphomas but also to the widespread intake of proton pump inhibitors and of wide-spectrum antimicrobials. It is highly probable that isolates of C.define causing this pandemic are genetically different than isolates of the same species predominating 20 years ago. This hypothesis is developed based on data of the epidemiology of CDI: in old times administration of clindamycin and ampicillin were the main drivers of CDI; recent studies report fluoroquinolones, 2nd and 3rd generation cephalosporins and even vancomycin (i.e. a drug of choice for CDI) to be linked with the development of CDI.

One major hurdle in management of CDI is relapse; the risk of relapse is reported as 15-20% after the first episode; however it is geometrically increased to even 60-80% after the second episode. As a consequence, management of CDI becomes a major health problem.

Fidaxomicin is a novel compound active against species of C.dificille. Results of two recent double-blind, randomized, large scale clinical studies have shown that oral treatment for 10 days with fidaxomicin 200mg bid was non-inferior to oral treatment with vancomycin 125mg q6h. However, the risk of relapse after treatment with vancomycin was close to 25% and with fidaxomicin close to 15%. This difference was statistically significant in both trials outscoring the superiority of fidaxomicin over vancomycin for the management of CDI. Moreover, meta-analysis has shown a significant reduction in mortality by fidaxomicin.

Despite proven superiority, prescription of fidaxomicin is limited to few cases mostly due to high cost. In many countries prescription is restricted to cases of relapsing CDI. Clinical feeling coming both from post-marketing experience as well as from published evidence supports the use of fidaxomicin for cases with risk of death and overt risk of relapse. However, molecular analysis of the C.difficile pathogen cannot be used as a tool for the prediction of relapse since in relapse cases pathogens carry less than 2 single nucleotide variants of the initial isolate. SPECIFY is aiming to develop a score using both clinical and genetic and biomarker data that can efficiently discriminate patients at risk of severe CDI and at risk of relapse of CDI. This score can become in future a tool to discriminate patients at need for treatment with fidaxomicin instead of traditional treatment with metronidazole/vancomycin.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

150

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Athens, Greece, 10676
        • 5th Department of Internal Medicine, Evangelismos Athens General Hospital
      • Athens, Greece, 11527
        • 1st Department of Internal Medicine, "G.Gennimatas" General hospital
      • Athens, Greece, 11527
        • 1st Department of Internal Medicine, Laikon General Hospital
      • Athens, Greece, 11527
        • 3rd Department of Internal Medicine, Sotiria General Hospital
      • Athens, Greece, 12462
        • 4th Department of Internal Medicine, Attikon University Hospital
      • Athens, Greece, 15126
        • 2nd Department of Internal Medicine, Sismanogleion General Hospital
      • Magoula, Greece, 10918
        • 1st Department of Internal Medicine, Thriassio General Hospital
      • Magoula, Greece, 10918
        • 2nd Department of Internal Medicine, Thriasio General Hospital
      • Maroúsi, Greece, 15123
        • 2nd Department of Oncology, Mitera Hospital
      • Piraeus, Greece
        • Infections Unit Tzaneion General Hospital
      • Pátra, Greece, 36504
        • Department of Internal Medicine, Patras University Hospital
      • Thessaloniki, Greece, 54248
        • 1st Department of Internal Medicine, AHEPA University Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

Patients with Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhea

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Age equal to or more than 18 years
  2. Both genders
  3. Diarrhea defined as at least 3 episodes of unformed stools in the last 24 hours according to the Bristol stool chart
  4. Presence of C.difficile in stool. This is defined as any stool sample positive for the presence of glutamate dehydrogenase (GDH) and for the presence of toxin A and/or B.

Exclusion Criteria:

1. No exclusion criteria exist

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Case-Only
  • Time Perspectives: Prospective

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Clostridium difficile infection
Patients with Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhea for development of biomarkers
Blood sampling
Other Names:
  • Single nucleotide polymorphisms
  • Serum cytokines

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Definition of prognostic biomarker
Time Frame: 12 months
Patients with positive score and unfavorable outcome. Unfavorable outcome is defined as at least one of the following: a) number of patients with severe infection at disease onset; b) number of patients who progress into severe infection; c) number of patients with disease recurrence; and d) number of patients who die
12 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Athanasios Skoutelis, MD, Evangelismos Athens General Hospital
  • Study Chair: Evangelos J Giamarellos-Bourboulis, MD, PhD, Attikon Hospital
  • Principal Investigator: George Chrysos, MD, PhD, Tzaneion Piraeus General Hospital
  • Principal Investigator: Styliani Symbardi, MD, PhD, Thriassio Elefsis General Hospital
  • Principal Investigator: Zoi Alexiou, MD, PhD, Thriassio Elefsis General Hospital
  • Principal Investigator: Kostantinos Syrigos, MD, PhD, Sotiria General Hospital
  • Principal Investigator: George Daikos, MD, PhD, Laikon Athens General Hospital
  • Principal Investigator: Panagiotis Gargalianos, MD, PhD, G.Gennimatas Athens General Hospital
  • Principal Investigator: Malvina Lada, MD, PhD, Sismanogleion General Hospital
  • Principal Investigator: Charalambos Gogos, MD, PhD, University Hospital of Patras
  • Principal Investigator: Ilias Athanasiadis, MD, PhD, Mitera General Hospital
  • Principal Investigator: Symeon Metallidis, MD, PhD, AHEPA Thessaloniki University Hospital

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

October 1, 2015

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2016

Study Completion (Actual)

October 1, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 8, 2015

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 9, 2015

First Posted (Estimate)

October 12, 2015

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

October 5, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 3, 2017

Last Verified

October 1, 2017

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Biologic Markers

Clinical Trials on Development of biomarkers

Subscribe