Influences of DNAR Order Prohibition on Hospital Discharged Ratios and Neurological Outcomes at Discharge

October 22, 2015 updated by: Umut Gulacti, Adiyaman University Research Hospital
Debates about the official and legal implementation of Do not attempt resuscitation (DNAR) orders are ongoing. The aim of this study was to determinate factors that influence neurological outcomes at discharge and the ratio of living patients discharged from the hospital due to DNAR prohibition.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

Study Design and Setting:

This is a single-center, retrospective chart review performed in a 180-bed rural city hospital.

Methods of Measurements:

Study was conducted as retrospective chart review of CPR call forms that were completed between February 2010 and February 2012. Approximately 450,000 patients were annually admitted to this hospital; 1800 patients were hospitalized in wards, and 500 patients were hospitalized in intensive care units during the study period. A form termed the CPR call form is completed by the leader of the CPR team at the end of all calls. These forms are filed in the hospital archive in chronological order. The hospital uses the resuscitation guidelines from the American Heart Association, and all healthcare providers of the CPR team are certified in basic cardiac life support (BCLS) and advanced cardiovascular life support (ACLS).

Study Population The data were collected from the CPR call forms and hospital medical records. All data were noted by using the Utstein-style reporting template and included the demographic data (date of birth/age and gender), date of arrest, time of first CPR attempt, etiology, preexisting conditions, location of arrest, arrest witnessed (a witnessed cardiac arrest is one that is observed or heard by another person or an arrest that is monitored), initial rhythm, duration of CPR attempt, end of event, date of discharge or death and neurological outcomes at discharge from the hospital.

CPR attempts were defined as an attempt to restore spontaneous circulation by performing chest compressions with or without ventilation. ROSC was defined by a status in which spontaneous circulation was sustained for at least 20 minutes.

Neurological outcomes at discharge were determined with a Cerebral Performance Category (CPC) score based on the last neurological examination of the patients before discharge. CPC scores of 1 or 2 were considered good neurological outcomes, and CPC scores of 3, 4 and 5 were considered poor neurological outcomes.

Data Analysis The continuous variables are expressed as the means and SD. The categorical data are expressed as percentages. Chi-square tests were used for the univariate analyses of categorical variables. Statistical significance was defined as p<0.05. The data were analyzed with SPSS v. 17.0.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

266

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Central
      • Adiyaman, Central, Turkey, 02000
        • Adiyaman University Research Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

19 years to 100 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

CPR call forms that were completed.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Patients experienced inhospital CPR attempts due to cardiac arrest
  2. Patients who did not have DNAR orders

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Patients below 18 years of age
  2. Calls performed due to code blue drills
  3. Missing calls
  4. Patients with more than one cardiac arrest
  5. Patients with CPR attempts that began outside the hospital who were admitted to the emergency department.
  6. Patients with missing the data in hospital medical records.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
patients alive discharged from hospital
patients alive discharged from hospital following CPR

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Examine survival rate from data obtained by retrospective chart review of patients who have not DNAR order and performed CPR due to cardiac arrest in the period 2010-2012
Time Frame: Two years
Data obtained by retrospective chart review will data including etiology, preexisting conditions, initial rhythm, end of event (any return of spontaneous circulation or not) live or death at discharged from hospital.
Two years

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Examine the influence on neurological outcomes at discharge of DNAR order prohibition from data obtained by retrospective chart review.
Time Frame: two years
Data obtained by retrospective chart review will data including neurological outcomes at discharge from the hospital.
two years

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Umut Gulacti, M.D., Adiyaman University of Medical Faculty

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

January 1, 2010

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2012

Study Completion (Actual)

January 1, 2015

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 21, 2015

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 22, 2015

First Posted (Estimate)

October 23, 2015

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

October 23, 2015

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 22, 2015

Last Verified

October 1, 2015

More Information

Terms related to this study

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Cardiac Arrest

3
Subscribe