Pre-hospital ECMO or Conventional Resuscitation for Refractory Cardiac Arrest (PACER)

PACER:Pre-hospital ECMO or Conventional Resuscitation for Refractory Cardiac Arrest. An Investigator Initiated, Parallel Group, Assessor-blinded, Registry Embedded, Randomised Controlled Pilot Trial

This pilot study aims to determine feasibility of randomising patients to receive pre-hospital Extracorporeal Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (ECPR) compared to conventional cardiac arrest care for refractory out of hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA).

The success of this study will be measured by the number of patients recruited into the study successfully treated with the treatment they were randomised to receive in the pre-Hospital setting.

Study Overview

Status

Not yet recruiting

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Conventional cardiac arrest care, including high performance cardiopulmonary resuscitation, defibrillation and administration of drugs such as adrenaline is the current treatment for out of hospital cardiac arrest. In cases where this treatment does not see spontaneous circulation restored promptly, the patients cardiac arrest is termed refractory. Refractory Cardiac arrest is coupled with an increased risk of hypoxic injury to vital organs and the prospect of survival with good neurological recovery decreases dramatically.

ECPR is an effective way to restore circulation for patients with refractory OHCA. Hospital based ECPR is the most common process by which refractory OHCA patients are treated with ECPR. Patients are transported to an ECPR capable hospital while receiving mechanical CPR. Transporting patients while receiving mechanical CPR is challenging and may lead to less effective CPR (low flow). It may also delay access to urgent hospital based treatments due to the extra time required to load a patient receiving mechanical CPR.

Pre-Hospital ECPR is where the ECMO team rapidly attends the scene and implements ECMO while CPR is on-going at the scene. Benefits of this approach may include reduced low-flow time due to both earlier ECMO initiation as well as allowing the emergency responders focus on delivering high performance CPR rather than loading the patient for transport.

The results of this study will inform a larger study where researchers will compare these two treatments to determine if ECPR leads to higher survival rates and better recovery for patients with refractory OHCA. Observational data for pre-hospital ECPR in the Australian setting looks promising. However ECPR systems are expensive and resource intensive, making answering this question an imperative.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

10

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Adult patients 18-70 years old
  • Witnessed cardiac arrest
  • Bystander CPR
  • Refractory cardiac arrest (>20 mins, but <45 mins)
  • Initial cardiac rhythm VF, VT or PEA
  • Within hours of PACER service operation (e.g. mon-fri 0800-1700)
  • Within 25 mins of rapid response ambulance (code 1 lights and sirens)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Initial cardiac rhythm asystole
  • ROSC with sustained recovery
  • Technically not possible to perform percutaneous cannulation
  • Evidence of/suspectedSignificant end stage disease:
  • Severe disability impairing activities of daily living
  • End-stage organ - cardiac, liver, lung, renal
  • Other life-limiting diseases e.g malignancy, terminal illness
  • Advance health care directive (not for resuscitation)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Pre-hospital ECPR Strategy
All patients will have high performance CPR at the scene throughout the resuscitation. If the patient is randomised to the Pre-hospital ECPR Strategy, this will be continued until the PACER team arrives. If return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) has not been achieved at this point, ECPR will be implemented. The patient will be transported to The Alfred Hospital to receive ongoing care.
Implementation of pre-Hospital ECPr in OHCA
No Intervention: Conventional Cardiac Arrest Strategy
All patients will have high performance CPR at the scene throughout the resuscitation. If the patient has been randomised to the Conventional Cardiac Arrest Strategy and ROSC has not occurred after >20 minutes, ongoing resuscitation will occur and the patient may be transported via AV to the nearest emergency cardiac catheterisation capable hospital where conventional resuscitation care will continue and Hospital based ECPR may be implemented if the patient meets local eligibility criteria. This is in line with current practice.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Proportion of patients in each group that are successfully initiated on ECMO.
Time Frame: 6 months
Proportion of patients in each group that are successfully initiated on ECMO. This will determine if it is feasible to randomise patients to receive either treatment
6 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Collaborators

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Sacha Richardson, MBBS, The Alfred

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

March 1, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

October 1, 2024

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 1, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 11, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 11, 2023

First Posted (Estimated)

December 20, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

December 20, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 11, 2023

Last Verified

December 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Out of Hospital Cardiac Arrest

Clinical Trials on Pre-Hospital ECPR

Subscribe