The Impact of Standard Medical Care (Dopamine) and Practice on Postural Motor Learning in Parkinson's Disease

The study determines whether standard medical care (dopamine) affects learning and retention of a postural stepping task in people with Parkinson's disease (PD) and whether training on a postural stepping task generalises to performance on an untrained postural task. Half the participants will train on the stepping task after they have taken their first dose of dopamine for the day (i.e. "on" medication state) while the other half will train on the same stepping task before taking their first daily dose of dopamine (i.e. "off" medication state).

Study Overview

• Status: Completed
• Conditions: Parkinson Disease
• Intervention / Treatment: Behavioral: Stepping training

Detailed Description

Motor learning is critical for acquiring new skills and adapting behaviour, therefore the success of rehabilitation depends on successful motor learning through practice. Motor learning involves the basal ganglia, including both the associative and sensorimotor striatum. Although people with PD are capable of motor learning, they are less efficient and do not achieve the same extent of skill acquisition and retention as people without neurological deficit.

Reductions in endogenous dopamine and reduced dopamine binding associated with loss of dopaminergic receptors due to disease progression may impair motor learning in people with PD. Conflicting evidence suggests that impaired motor learning in PD is due on the one hand to the absence of dopamine but on the other hand to "overdosing" of the basal ganglia with dopamine replacement therapy which suppresses activation of the associative striatum during the early acquisition stages of motor learning.

Understanding which factors improve or degrade motor learning of tasks will allow rehabilitation parameters to be adjusted around standard medical care in order to optimize learning and improve the efficacy of exercise interventions for people with PD. In particular, successful learning of postural tasks that challenge stability may in turn reduce falls.

• Study Type: Interventional
• Enrollment (Actual): 27
• Phase: Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

Study Locations

• United States
  • Utah
    • Salt Lake City, Utah, United States, 84108
      • University of Utah

Participation Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

• Ages Eligible for Study: 50 years to 80 years (Adult, Older Adult)
• Accepts Healthy Volunteers: No
• Genders Eligible for Study: All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

• Idiopathic Parkinson's disease confirmed by neurologist
• Hoehn and Yahr stages 1 to 3
• On a stable dose of antiparkinsonian medication for the past month and will continue on this regime for at least another subsequent month
• Walks unaided

Exclusion Criteria:

• Not taking dopamine replacement therapy
• With prior surgical management for PD (e.g. deep brain stimulation)
• With medication-resistant freezing of gait
• Significant cognitive impairment (Montreal Cognitive Assessment score <18)
• Unstable medical conditions
• Other neurological conditions
• Unable to follow instructions or safely complete the training tasks

Study Plan

How is the study designed?

Design Details

• Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
• Allocation: Randomized
• Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
• Masking: Single

Number of Arms

2

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm	Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Training "off" medication; Participants will train on the postural stepping task before taking their first daily dose of standard Parkinson's medication (dopamine), i.e. while "off" dopamine replacement medication	Behavioral: Stepping training; Participants will step rapidly to one of four cued targets. Each trial will consist of 24 steps. Participants will perform 6 blocks of 6 trials per day for 3 consecutive days.
Other: Training "on" medication; Participants will train on the postural stepping task after taking their first daily dose of standard Parkinson's medication (dopamine), i.e. while "on" dopamine replacement medication	Behavioral: Stepping training; Participants will step rapidly to one of four cued targets. Each trial will consist of 24 steps. Participants will perform 6 blocks of 6 trials per day for 3 consecutive days.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure	Measure Description	Time Frame
General task performance (response time of the random sequence) at initial retention, adjusted for baseline	Response time of the random sequence within initial retention trial, adjusted for baseline (i.e. the first trial of acquisition on Day 3)	Day 8 (i.e. 48 hours after the last block of training)
Implicit sequence learning (difference in response time between the random and repeated sequences) at initial retention, adjusted for baseline	The difference in response time between the random and repeated sequences of the initial retention trial, adjusted for baseline (i.e. the first trial of acquisition on Day 3)	Day 8 (i.e. 48 hours after the last block of training)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure	Measure Description	Time Frame
Immediate decrement (difference in response time between initial retention and the last trial of acquisition) in general task performance, adjusted for baseline	The difference in response time of the random sequence within the initial retention trial and the last trial of acquisition, adjusted for baseline (i.e. first trial of acquisition)	Day 5, Day 8 (i.e. 48 hours after the last block of training)
Delayed decrement (difference in response time between delayed retention and the last trial of acquisition) in general task performance, adjusted for baseline	The difference in response time of the random sequence within the delayed retention trial and the last trial of acquisition, adjusted for baseline (i.e. first trial of acquisition)	Day 5, Day 13-15 (i.e. at least 7 days after the last block of training)
Immediate decrement (difference in response time between initial retention and the last trial of acquisition) in implicit sequence learning (difference in response time between the random and repeated sequences), adjusted for baseline	The difference in response time between the random and repeated sequences of the last trial of acquisition subtracted from the difference in response time between the random and repeated sequences of the initial retention trial, adjusted for baseline (i.e. first trial of acquisition)	Day 5, Day 8 (i.e. 48 hours after the last block of training)
Delayed decrement (difference in response time between delayed retention and the last trial of acquisition) in implicit sequence learning (difference in response time between the random and repeated sequences), adjusted for baseline	The difference in response time between the random and repeated sequences of the last trial of acquisition subtracted from the difference in response time between the random and repeated sequences of the delayed retention trial, adjusted for baseline (i.e. first trial of acquisition)	Day 5, Day 13-15 (i.e. at least 7 days after the last block of training)
Four Square Step test score, adjusted for baseline	Time taken to complete the Four Square Step test at delayed retention, adjusted for baseline (Four Square Step test score at baseline, i.e. 3 days prior to the first block of training)	Day 13-15 (i.e. at least 7 days after the last block of training)
MiniBEST score, adjusted for baseline	MiniBEST score at delayed retention, adjusted for baseline (MiniBEST score at baseline, i.e. 3 days prior to the first block of training)	Day 13-15 (i.e. at least 7 days after the last block of training)

Collaborators and Investigators

• Sponsor: University of Utah
• Collaborators: American Parkinson's Disease Association, Inc
• Investigators: Principal Investigator: Serene S Paul, PhD, University of Utah

Study record dates

Study Major Dates

• Study Start (Actual): July 1, 2016
• Primary Completion (Actual): May 11, 2017
• Study Completion (Actual): May 11, 2017

Study Registration Dates

• First Submitted: October 29, 2015
• First Submitted That Met QC Criteria: October 29, 2015
• First Posted (Estimate): November 1, 2015

Study Record Updates

• Last Update Posted (Actual): February 22, 2018
• Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria: February 19, 2018
• Last Verified: February 1, 2018

More Information

Terms related to this study

• Keywords: Learning; Practice
• Additional Relevant MeSH Terms: Brain Diseases; Central Nervous System Diseases; Nervous System Diseases; Parkinsonian Disorders; Basal Ganglia Diseases; Movement Disorders; Synucleinopathies; Neurodegenerative Diseases; Parkinson Disease
• Other Study ID Numbers: IRB_00085073