Efficacy of Oral vs. Intravenous Acetaminophen

The Comparative Efficacy of Oral vs. Intravenous Acetaminophen in Sinus Surgery Patients

The comparative efficacy of intravenous (IV) to oral (PO-'per os') acetaminophen in the management of postoperative pain is understudied and largely unknown. In this observer blinded randomized clinical trial, investigators aim to determine the comparative efficacy of PO (preoperative) vs. IV (intraoperative) acetaminophen in a sinus surgery population.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

The comparative efficacy of intravenous (IV) to oral (PO-'per os') acetaminophen is understudied and largely unknown. Intravenous acetaminophen has been available since 2010 (http://www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/label/2010/022450lbl.pdf) and has proven superiority over placebo in human clinical trials. It is clearly advantageous in patients who cannot take oral medications. Similarly, oral acetaminophen has proven efficacy in the management of postoperative pain.

However, in patients who can receive either formulation the incremental cost of the IV formulation, both to the Health System and patient, is substantial. This incremental cost would be justifiable if there were clear efficacy or safety data to support the preferential use of IV over PO acetaminophen.

However, there is no evidence of superior safety and there are only two studies to our knowledge investigating the question of comparative efficacy. Fenlon et al. randomized 130 patients undergoing 3rd molar (i.e., wisdom tooth) removal to IV vs. PO acetaminophen and found that PO acetaminophen was non-inferior to IV acetaminophen. The primary endpoint was postoperative pain score 1h after surgery. No safety concerns were identified in either group. Pettersson et al. randomized cardiac surgery patients to IV or PO acetaminophen, starting immediately postoperatively through the following morning, and found a significant opioid sparing effect of IV acetaminophen but no difference in pain scores or nausea.

IV acetaminophen avoids first-pass hepatic metabolism and therefore generates higher serum and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF)/brain levels than does PO acetaminophen (http://ofirmev.com/Pharmacokinetics/). Based on the pharmacokinetic data, one can hypothesize that IV acetaminophen would be superior to PO acetaminophen at time points where serum and/or cerebrospinal fluid drug levels are higher.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

110

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Texas
      • Dallas, Texas, United States, 75390
        • Zale Lipshy University Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 80 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Adult patients aged 18 years or older
  • Undergoing elective sinus surgery at Zale Lipshy Hospital

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Inability of the patient to follow directions or comprehend either English or Spanish language.

    • Disorders of the liver which would make acetaminophen contraindicated (such as hepatitis, liver failure, prior liver transplant, etc).
    • Patients with chronic pain manifest by a baseline pain score > 4/10
    • Chronic opioid use (>2 weeks continuously), or illicit drug abuse
    • Body weight < 50 kg.
    • Patients with contraindications to any of the study drugs (such as Malignant Hyperthermia susceptible, celecoxib or sulfa allergy, etc.).
    • Patients who have taken analgesic medications on the morning of surgery (prior to arrival).
    • Allergy to acetaminophen

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Oral Acetaminophen
Oral Acetaminophen 1-hour before surgery
1000mg oral acetaminophen + 400mg oral celecoxib given within one hour of incision
Other Names:
  • Tylenol
Active Comparator: Intravenous Acetaminophen
Intravenous Acetaminophen within 1-hour prior to anesthetic emergence
400mg oral celecoxib given within one hour of incision + 1000mg IV acetaminophen within one hour prior to anesthetic emergence.
Other Names:
  • Tylenol

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Postoperative Pain Score on the Scale of 10 (0=No Pain and 10=Worst Pain)
Time Frame: 1-h postoperatively
Pain score on the scale of 10 at 1-h postoperatively in the Post-Anesthesia Care Unit (PACU)
1-h postoperatively

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Morphine Equivalents of Postoperative Opioid Usage
Time Frame: an expected average of 6 hours
Total amount of postoperative opioid usage at Postoperative Anesthesia Care Unit (PACU), an expected average of 6 hours
an expected average of 6 hours

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: David McDonagh, MD, UT Southwestern Medical Center

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

August 17, 2015

Primary Completion (Actual)

September 2, 2016

Study Completion (Actual)

January 15, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 2, 2015

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 29, 2015

First Posted (Estimate)

December 31, 2015

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 21, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 20, 2020

Last Verified

April 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Postoperative Pain

Clinical Trials on Oral Acetaminophen

3
Subscribe