Effectiveness of the Advocate Lutheran General Survivorship Center Programs

July 9, 2019 updated by: Sigrun Hallmeyer, MD, Advocate Health Care

Assessing the Effectiveness of the Advocate Lutheran General Survivorship Center Programs on Patients' Quality of Life, Distress Level, and Satisfaction

The objective of this observational study is to assess the effectiveness of the Advocate Lutheran General Survivorship Center's Programs by measuring the following outcomes of interest on participating patients:

  1. Quality of life
  2. Distress level
  3. Satisfaction with the Survivorship Program

General Hypothesis: Patients who participate in at least four classes in a two month period will have higher scores on the post-class satisfaction, quality of life, and distress surveys compared to their pre-class surveys.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

  • If a patient agrees to participate, written consent will be obtained by the study coordinators. Before the start of the first class at the Survivorship Center and after the patients have signed the consent and HIPAA authorization forms, patients will fill out three questionnaires. These include the standardized RAND 36 Health Survey, the Distress Thermometer, and a pilot survey regarding expectations and satisfaction with the Survivorship Program.
  • The RAND-36 survey is a form that includes 36 questions and asks how patients feel their illness has impacted them and their lifestyle with scoring as noted. Pre-coded numeric values are recoded per the scoring key. They are scored so that a high score means patient is in better health, 0 being the worst and 10 being the best. Scores represent the percentage of total possible score achieved. Items in the same scale are averaged together to create the 8 scale scores. Missing data is not taken into account. The RAND 36-Item Health Survey 1.0 has been validated in previous studies. According to the VanderZee's study (1996), it was shown that the "internal consistency of the instrument was high with high convergent validity."
  • The Distress Thermometer (DT) tool asks patients 39 questions about practical, family, emotional, religious, and physical problems in a "yes" or "no" format. A "yes" will scored as 0 and a "no" will be scored as 1. Therefore, the lower the stress level, the higher the score. The scores will be added for a total score. If the patient does show a high level of distress with a score above 12 on the Distress Thermometer after the four classes at the Survivorship Center, we will refer the patient back to his or her physician for further guidance and possible counseling.
  • The Expectation Survey consists of eight questions that ask patients about their expectations for what they want/hope to get out of the Survivorship Program. Patients will rank their answers from 1 - 5 based on how much they agree with the statement (1 being not at all, 5 being very much). The scores for each eight questions will then be averaged.
  • The Satisfaction Survey is also an eight question form that is much like the Expectation Survey. Patients will also indicate how satisfied with they are with the classes/courses at the Survivorship Center. The same scaling as above (1-5; 1 being not all agreeing with the statement and 5 being very much) with be used. These two surveys will be pilot tested for content relevance and readability level with current patients. Editions will be made as necessary. There will also be an open ended question at the end to ask patients what they would add to the classes to make them more beneficial.
  • Participants will be asked to complete the Rand-36 SF, Distress Thermometer, and Satisfaction Survey after attending at least four Survivorship classes in a two month period.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

22

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Illinois
      • Park Ridge, Illinois, United States, 60068
        • Advocate Lutheran General Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Newly diagnosed cancer patients who see one of the oncologists at The Advocate Lutheran General Hospital Center of for Advanced Care. Patients who older than 18 years of age, male or female, and any race are eligible. Patients who are new to the Survivorship Center or only visited once are eligible.

Description

  • Inclusion Criteria

    • Patients older than 18 years of age, any gender, and any race
    • Newly diagnosed with any type of cancer and now seeing one of the oncologists at the Advocate Lutheran General Hospital's Center for Advanced Care
    • Patients new to the Survivorship Center or only visited once
    • Must attend at least four classes in a two month period (any class, any time, any day)
    • Able to consent
    • English speaking patient
  • Exclusion Criteria

    • Not a newly diagnosed cancer patient
    • Patients under the age of 18
    • Pregnant patients
    • Prisoners
    • Unable to consent
    • Non - English speaking patient

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Quality of life
Time Frame: 6-8 months
Questionnaire that includes 36 questions and asks how patients feel their illness has impacted them and their lifestyle with scoring as noted.
6-8 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Distress level
Time Frame: 6-8 months
The tool asks patients 39 questions about practical, family, emotional, religious, and physical problems in a "yes" or "no" format. A "yes" will scored as 0 and a "no" will be scored as 1. Therefore, the lower the stress level, the higher the score. The scores will be added for a total score.
6-8 months
Satisfaction with the Survivorship Program
Time Frame: 6-8 months
Questionnaire that includes 8 questions that indicate how satisfied the patients are with the classes offered at the Survivorship Center.
6-8 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Sigrun Hallmeyer, MD, Advocate Lutheran General Hospital

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

October 1, 2016

Primary Completion (Actual)

March 31, 2017

Study Completion (Actual)

August 14, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 14, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 19, 2016

First Posted (Estimate)

January 21, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

July 10, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 9, 2019

Last Verified

July 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 5857

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

Conference presentation and publication

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Quality of Life

3
Subscribe