Impact of NMES on Spirometry Values, Functional Capacity and Quality of Life in Patients With Pulmonary Hypertension

November 14, 2019 updated by: Profa. Dra. Vera Lúcia dos Santos Alves, Faculdade de Ciências Médicas da Santa Casa de São Paulo

Impact of Peripheral Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation on Spirometry Values, Functional Capacity and Quality of Life in Patients With Pulmonary Hypertension

Pulmonary hypertension (PH) features symptoms related to a decreased cardiac autonomic response, pulmonary function and exercise capacity.

Non-pharmacological interventions are low cost and can significant enhance outcomes in these patients. Neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) has been proposed as a viable therapeutic approach in patients with functional limitations, particularly those that present with difficulty to perform exercise protocols.

Objective: to evaluate the impact of NMES on exercise capacity, spirometry values and quality of life of patients with PH.

Material and methods: prospective randomized controlled study with a control group (GC, n9) and NMES goup (GE, n8). Quality of life and exercise capacity through the six-minute walk test (6MWT) were assessed before and after the NMES protocol.

Results: the GE presented with a significant improvement in distance walked in the 6MWT, cycle ergometry, spirometry and quality of life in the areas of vitality, emotional and social aspects of the questionnaire Short Form Health Survey-36.

Conclusion: NMES is a useful tool in the treatment of patients with PH, resulting in improved exercise capacity, quality of life and lung function testing.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

30

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Sao Paulo, Brazil, 01221-020
        • Santa Casa of Sao Paulo Medical School

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 80 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

Males and females greater than or equal to 18 years of age, clinically stable with optimized drug therapy in the last 3 months, previously diagnosed with a mean pulmonary arterial pressure ≥ 25 mmHg by right heart catheterization and who agreed to participate by signing an informed consent were included.

Exclusion Criteria:

Exclusion criteria included a diagnosis of Down syndrome, orthopedic disease or neurologic or diagnoses, history of acute heart attack, use of beta-blockers, any urgent or elective surgical intervention during the implementation of the protocol, those who used assistive devices to ambulate or develop an infectious process during the study protocol.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
No Intervention: Control Group (GC)
The GC received standard ambulatory care, including routine exams and drug therapy. All patients were reassessed after the 2 month protocol.
Experimental: NMES Group (GE)
Receiving the usual care and guidance on their illness, underwent 30 minute NMES sessions twice a week for two months using an electrostimulator. Specifically, 5 cm adhesive surface electrodes in four alternate channels on the Rectus Femoris (two channels the right and two on the left) were used to deliver two-phase symmetrical currents, with a rectangular pulse wave at a frequency of 35 Hz and pulse duration of 250 μ. The time of ascent and descent was one second, contraction time was four seconds and relaxation was eight seconds.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Distance in six-minute walk test
Time Frame: change from baseline in distance at 2 months
analysis of distance
change from baseline in distance at 2 months
Oxygen saturation in six-minute walk test
Time Frame: change from baseline in oxygen saturation at 2 months
analysis of oxygen saturation at end of test
change from baseline in oxygen saturation at 2 months
Systolic blood pressure in six-minute walk test
Time Frame: change from baseline in systolic blood pressure at 2 months
analysis of systolic blood pressure at end of test
change from baseline in systolic blood pressure at 2 months
Diastolic blood pressure in six-minute walk test
Time Frame: change from baseline in diastolic blood pressure at 2 months
analysis of diastolic blood pressure at end of test
change from baseline in diastolic blood pressure at 2 months
Heart rate in six-minute walk test
Time Frame: change from baseline in heart rate at 2 months
analysis of heart rate at end of test
change from baseline in heart rate at 2 months
Borg scale in six-minute walk test
Time Frame: change from baseline in Borg scale at 2 months
analysis of Borg scale at end of test
change from baseline in Borg scale at 2 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The Medical Outcomes Study 36-item Short Form Health Survey
Time Frame: change from baseline at 2 months
The questionnaire covers 36 items, designed to assess health concepts
change from baseline at 2 months
Forced vital capacity
Time Frame: change from baseline at 2 months
spirometric analysis
change from baseline at 2 months
Forced expiratory volume in the first second
Time Frame: change from baseline at 2 months
spirometric analysis
change from baseline at 2 months
Forced expiratory flow 25-75 %
Time Frame: change from baseline at 2 months
spirometric analysis
change from baseline at 2 months
Ratio of forced expiratory volume in the first second and forced vital capacity
Time Frame: change from baseline at 2 months
spirometric analysis
change from baseline at 2 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

June 1, 2014

Primary Completion (Actual)

June 1, 2016

Study Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2016

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 8, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 14, 2016

First Posted (Estimate)

March 18, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

November 18, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 14, 2019

Last Verified

February 1, 2016

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Pulmonary Hypertension

Clinical Trials on Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation

3
Subscribe