Comparison of Two Universal Composites in Posterior Teeth

August 30, 2016 updated by: Zeynep Bilge Kutuk, Hacettepe University

Prospective, Randomized, Controlled, Double Blind Trial of Two Universal Composites in Posterior Teeth

The aim of this randomized, prospective clinical study was to compare the clinical performance of a universal light-curing, ultra-fine particle hybrid composite with a new version of this product produced by the same manufacturer in Class 1 and Class 2 lesions.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

A total of 80 (13 Class 1 and 67 Class 2) lesions in 40 patients (21 females, 19 males) with ages ranging between 18-38 years (23.15±5.15) were either restored with Charisma or Charisma Classic (Heraeus Kulzer) in combination with an etch and rinse adhesive system (Gluma 2 Bond) under rubber dam isolation by two experienced operators according to the manufacturer's instructions. Two independent examiners, who were blinded to the composites used evaluated the restorations according to the FDI (World Dental Federation) criteria. Bite-wing radiographs and intraoral digital photographs were taken before and after treatment and at 6 months. The statistical analyses were carried out with McNemar, Pearson Chi-square and Cochran Q tests (p<0.05).

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

40

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Turkey
      • Ankara, Turkey, 06100
        • Hacettepe University School of Dentistry

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 38 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • a need for at least two but not more than four posterior tooth-colored restorations
  • the presence of teeth to be restored in occlusion
  • teeth that were symptomless and vital
  • a normal periodontal status
  • a good likelihood of recall availability.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • partly erupted teeth
  • absence of adjacent and antagonist teeth
  • poor periodontal status
  • adverse medical history
  • potential behavioral problems.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Charisma
applied randomly
Other: Charisma

The surfaces were etched using 35% phosphoric acid for 30 s. The etched surfaces were rinsed and dried. Charisma was used in combination Gluma2 Bond etch&rinse adhesive. The composite resin restorations were light-cured (600 milliwatt/cm²). Occlusion was checked with thin articulating papers.

Restoration surfaces were finished and polished with fine finishing diamond burs, stones and rubber cups.

Other Names:
  • universal composite
Active Comparator: Charisma classic
applied randomly
Other: Charisma Classic

The surfaces were etched using 35% phosphoric acid for 30 s. The etched surfaces were rinsed and dried. Charisma classic was used in combination Gluma2 Bond etch&rinse adhesive. The composite resin restorations were light-cured (600 milliwatt/cm²). Occlusion was checked with thin articulating papers.

Restoration surfaces were finished and polished with fine finishing diamond burs, stones and rubber cups.

Other Names:
  • universal composite

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Observers evaluated the esthetic properties of the restorations using FDI (World Dental Federation) Criteria.
Time Frame: The changes at restorations were obtained from baseline (one week after treatment), 6 month, 1, 2, 3 and 4 year.
"Surface luster"; "Staining (surface, margins)"; "Color match and translucency"; "Esthetic anatomical form"
The changes at restorations were obtained from baseline (one week after treatment), 6 month, 1, 2, 3 and 4 year.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Observers evaluated the functional properties of the restorations using FDI (World Dental Federation) Criteria.
Time Frame: The changes at restorations were obtained from baseline (one week after treatment), 6 month, 1, 2, 3 and 4 year.
"Fracture of material and retention"; "Marginal adaptation"
The changes at restorations were obtained from baseline (one week after treatment), 6 month, 1, 2, 3 and 4 year.

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Observers evaluated the biological properties of the restorations using FDI (World Dental Federation) Criteria.
Time Frame: The changes at restorations were obtained from baseline (one week after treatment), 6 month, 1, 2, 3 and 4 year.
"Recurrence of caries, erosion, abfraction"; and "Tooth integrity (enamel cracks, tooth fractures)"
The changes at restorations were obtained from baseline (one week after treatment), 6 month, 1, 2, 3 and 4 year.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Hacettepe University

Investigators

  • Study Director: Sevil Gurgan, DDS, PhD, Hacettepe University School of Dentistry

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

May 1, 2014

Primary Completion (Actual)

May 1, 2016

Study Completion (Actual)

May 1, 2016

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 24, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 30, 2016

First Posted (Estimate)

September 5, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

September 5, 2016

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 30, 2016

Last Verified

August 1, 2016

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 2014/03-13(KA-14005)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Dental Caries

Clinical Trials on Charisma

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

CROs by country

CROs in Venezuela

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Subscribe