Multicenter Retrospective Evaluation of the Surgical Management of Spinal Growth Dystrophy (DRC)

September 4, 2017 updated by: Groupe Hospitalier Paris Saint Joseph

Spinal growth dystrophy (CRD), also called Scheuermann's disease, corresponding to impaired vertebral structure occurring in children and adolescents with involvement of the growth cartilage causing impaired growth and kyphosis.

There are forms thoracolumbar and thoracic conventional forms of DRC with variable clinical expressions; the most important being kyphosis with spinal stiffness associated with painful elements.

The radiographic definition according Sorenson is uniformisation 5 ° affecting at least three adjacent vertebrae.

Scheuermann's disease and three problems. First, the thoracic kyphosis generates back pain which may be thoracic or lumbar indirectly attributed to compensatory lordosis. Moreover disruption sagittal balance frequently causes a significant aesthetic discomfort. Finally, scalability because the curvature may increase the likelihood of degenerative lesions disc degeneration or lumbar spinal stenosis for example.

When the disease is diagnosed early, treatment is most often associated with orthopedic physiotherapy. However, for patients with active deformation, despite an orthopedic brace treatment with chronic pain, neurological deficit or for aesthetic reasons, surgical decision can be taken.

The goal of surgical treatment of DRC is a correction of the thoracic kyphosis. It goes through a spinal fusion must be released from his column stiffness in a bad position, changing the equilibrium profile and ensure that it remains in a good position.

This surgery usually requires a prior operative time (thoracic surgery to remove the intervertebral discs) and a posterior surgical time (blockage of the vertebrae together with a bone graft and osteosynthesis). Currently different surgical strategies are practiced there is no real consensus between the teams.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

objectives:

  1. Evaluation of the rate and type of complications in different age categories and surgical strategies.
  2. Evaluation of clinical results based on surgical strategies.
  3. Evaluation of sagittal balance and correction obtained based surgical strategies

Methodology and duration of the research

This is a multicenter retrospective cohort on the assessment of surgical practices cited objectives. Also, this research is in Chapter X of the Data Protection Act and allows the collection of personal data for the purpose of evaluation of care and prevention practices with authorization request to the CNIL; the opinion of CCTIRS therefore not required in this case.

This study concerns the data of patients operated with the techniques mentioned in addition with a decline of more than 20 years.

Patients are aware of the potential use of their data in their files for medical research through oral information provided by the doctor at the signing by the patient's consent related to the surgery and most recently contained in the Home booklet setting for patients.

Nature of the data collected

The data is anonymous and not identifiable (for each subject a number of inclusion is given). The name of the surgeon is also anonymized.

The data collected concern the characteristics of the patient, as well as its history, the operating data including technical, suites and possible post-operative complications and patient monitoring.

Data collection will be done on the basis KEOPS https://www.keops-spine.fr

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

16

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Ile-de-France
      • Paris, Ile-de-France, France, 75014
        • Groupe hospitalier Paris saint Joseph

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

10 years and older (Child, Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Patients operated on for an arthrodesis Dystrophy Spinal Growth (DRC)

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • patients operated on for an arthrodesis Dystrophy Spinal Growth (DRC)
  • Age> 10 years
  • monitoring of minimum one year

Exclusion Criteria:

  • deformation in the frontal plane
  • kyphosis malformation
  • osteoporotic or degenerative kyphosis
  • post laminectomy kyphosis
  • constitutional bone disease
  • connective Tissue Disease
  • myopathy

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Surgery complication type
Time Frame: Day 30
Statement from the database keops
Day 30

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Assessment od the clinical results based on surgical strategies
Time Frame: Day 30

Evaluation of clinical results based on surgical strategies. Statement from the database keops :

  • Worse,
  • Acceptable,
  • Good
Day 30
Assessment of sagittal balance and correction Score obtained
Time Frame: Day 30

Evaluation of sagittal balance score obtained based surgical strategies. Statement from the database keops:

  • Worse,
  • Acceptable,
  • Good
Day 30
Assessment of correction Score obtained
Time Frame: Day 30

Evaluation of sagittal correction score obtained based surgical strategies. Statement from the database keops:

  • Worse,
  • Acceptable,
  • Good
Day 30

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

December 1, 2014

Primary Completion (Actual)

January 30, 2015

Study Completion (Actual)

April 15, 2016

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 31, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 13, 2016

First Posted (Estimate)

September 19, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

September 6, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 4, 2017

Last Verified

September 1, 2017

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • DRC

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Hip Replacement

Clinical Trials on No intervention. Observational and descriptive study

3
Subscribe