Diagnostic Reasoning and Sense of Alarm at Dyspnoea and / or Chest Pain (RaisDiag)

November 19, 2018 updated by: University Hospital, Brest
Dyspnea and chest pain represent 1.5% of general practice consultations. They may be a sign of many diseases, potentially serious. The concept of Gut Feelings brings a sense of alarm and reinsurance. The sense of alarm reflects a sense of mistrust about the patient's clinical situation, in the absence of objective argument. The sense of reinsurance reflects a sense of confidence about the patient's situation, in the absence of objective argument. Gut Feelings plays a key role in the diagnostic reasoning in general practice. A questionnaire measuring the Gut Feelings was validated in French after a linguistic validation procedure.

Study Overview

Status

Terminated

Conditions

Detailed Description

Dyspnea and chest pain represent 1.5% of general practice consultations. They may be a sign of many diseases, potentially serious. The concept of Gut Feelings brings a sense of alarm and reinsurance. The sense of alarm reflects a sense of mistrust about the patient's clinical situation, in the absence of objective argument. The sense of reinsurance reflects a sense of confidence about the patient's situation, in the absence of objective argument. Gut Feelings plays a key role in the diagnostic reasoning in general practice. A questionnaire measuring the Gut Feelings was validated in French after a linguistic validation procedure.

The objective of the research is to calculate the precision of the sense of alarm the general practitioner facing a consultant for chest pain or dyspnea and patient

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

241

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • France
      • Brest, France, 29200
        • ABALAIN-VOREUX Aurélie
      • Brest, France, 29200
        • SIMON Benjamin
      • Camaret Sur Mer, France, 29570
        • AUFFRET Jean François
      • Guerlesquin, France, 29248
        • POINOT Anne
      • La Forêt Landerneau, France, 29800
        • LE GOFF Delphine
      • Pleyben, France, 29190
        • BEURTON-COURAUD Lucas
      • Ploudalmezeau, France, 29830
        • LE DUFF Nicolas
      • Plounéour Trez, France, 29890
        • BODIN Bénédicte
      • Plouzané, France, 29280
        • CAM Françoise
      • Pont l'Abbé, France, 29120
        • LOSQUIN André
      • Saint Nicolas du Pelem, France, 22480
        • MAHE Gwénaëlle

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 80 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

Patients between 18 and 80 years and consulting on primary care for chest pain or dyspnea

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients between 18 and 80 years
  • Patients consulting on primary care for chest pain or dyspnea

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Other
  • Time Perspectives: Prospective

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
calculate the accuracy of the sense of alarm the general practitioner face a patient consultant for chest pain or dyspnea.
Time Frame: 4 weeks
Questionary
4 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

University Hospital, Brest

Collaborators

University of Anvers
Ecole doctorale de Bretagne en biologie de santé

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

October 21, 2016

Primary Completion (Actual)

May 9, 2018

Study Completion (Actual)

May 9, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 12, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 12, 2016

First Posted (Estimate)

October 13, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

November 20, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 19, 2018

Last Verified

November 1, 2018

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 29BRC16.0143

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Chest Pain

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

CROs by country

CROs in India

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Subscribe