A Novel Fully Integrated Mobile Management Solution Using Cell Phone Technology for Heart Failure

October 13, 2016 updated by: Stuti Dang MD, University of Miami
The purpose of this research study is to learn about the use of a cell phone for monitoring patients with heart failure. Participants will be asked questions about their heart failure daily and participants will need to answer them. The investigator will try to assess if the questions are easily understood by the participants. The investigator will also assess if the phone-based system for monitoring is easy to use by the participants. The investigator will also assess if the daily questions and interactions increase the self-efficacy, knowledge, and quality of life of participants related to their heart failure.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

61

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Florida
      • Miami, Florida, United States, 33125
        • Miami VA Healthcare System

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Have a diagnosis of heart failure
  • Have an anticipated survival ≥ 6 months
  • Receive care at the University of Miami or Jackson Healthcare system
  • 18 years or older
  • Able to communicate in English and/or Spanish
  • Able to operate a cell phone, read, understand, and respond to the questions on the cell phone, and are able to use the weight scale.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Previous history of unstable coronary syndromes
  • History of end-stage heart failure or heart transplantation

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Cell-Phone Intervention Arm
A standard cell phone system sent web-browser messages daily to ask about their weight and symptoms of heart failure. Participants received up to 3 daily messages 15 minutes apart at a time of their choosing for 90 days. Participants were given a mobile phone for the 90 day period and a weight scale.
Participants responded to questions about their heart failure symptoms using a cell phone.
No Intervention: Usual Care
Usual Care participants continued to receive care in the Heart Failure Clinic. All subjects were enrolled in the study for 90 days. Participants were given a weight scale.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Self-Efficacy for Managing Chronic Disease
Time Frame: 90 days
This was used from the Chronic disease self-management program scales. (http://patienteducation.stanford.edu/research). Well-validated scale rating patient's confidence in managing chronic illness. It covers several areas of chronic diseases including symptom control, role functions, emotional functioning, and communicating with physicians. The English version has 6-items, while the Spanish version has 4-items.16 Using a Likert scale with item scores ranging from 1 to 10; scale score is the mean of the items.
90 days

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Health Distress Scale
Time Frame: 90 days
This was used from the Chronic disease self-management program scales. (http://patienteducation.stanford.edu/research). Measures the distress associated with health problems over the last month. Using a Likert scale with item scores ranging from 0 to 5, scale score is the mean of the four items.
90 days
Communication with Physicians
Time Frame: 90 days
This was used from the Chronic disease self-management program scales. (http://patienteducation.stanford.edu/research). Measures key behaviors to assess how well patients communicate with their healthcare providers. Using a Likert scale with item scores ranging from 0 to 5, scale score is the mean of the three items.
90 days
Fatigue Visual Numeric
Time Frame: 90 days
This was used from the Chronic disease self-management program scales. (http://patienteducation.stanford.edu/research). Assesses self-reported fatigue in the past 2 weeks. This visual numeric scale is a modified version of the visual analog scale. It uses 10 bars of different heights and shading intensity.
90 days
Shortness of Breath Visual Numeric
Time Frame: 90 days
This was used from the Chronic disease self-management program scales. (http://patienteducation.stanford.edu/research). Assesses self-reported shortness of breath in the past 2 weeks.
90 days
Heart Failure Self-Efficacy Scale-30
Time Frame: 90 days
30-item scale developed for self-efficacy with heart failure overall and with medications, diet, symptoms, activity, and heart failure readmission. Using a Likert scale with item scores ranging from 0 to 10, scale score is the mean of the items.
90 days
European Heart Failure Self-Care Behavior Scale
Time Frame: 90 days
12-item questionnaire assesses self-care behavior of patients with heart failure. Using a Likert scale with item scores ranging from 1 to 5, scale score is the sum of responses.
90 days
Dutch Heart Failure Knowledge Scale
Time Frame: 90 days
15-item questionnaire assesses heart failure knowledge in general, knowledge on heart failure treatment (including diet and fluid restriction) and heart failure symptoms and symptom recognition. Each correct answer gets one point and total score ranges from 0 to 15.
90 days
Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire
Time Frame: 90 days
21-item questionnaire assesses HF specific quality of life, using a 6-point Likert scale with item scores ranging from 0 to 5, scale score is the sum of responses.
90 days
The Medical Outcome Study 36-Item Short Form
Time Frame: 90 days
36-item quality of life instrument used to evaluate perception of general health status, functional ability, and well-being.
90 days
Usability survey
Time Frame: 90 days
31-item scale developed for this study to assess the participants' satisfaction with 7 aspects of the intervention using a 7-point Likert scale with item scores ranging from 1 to 7 (7 being best), and total score is the mean of responses. Patients were also asked open-ended questions in order to obtain an in-depth understanding of individual experiences, perceptions, concerns and feedback.
90 days

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Stuti Dang, MD, MPH, University of Miami

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

February 1, 2011

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2011

Study Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2011

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 13, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 13, 2016

First Posted (Estimate)

October 17, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

October 17, 2016

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 13, 2016

Last Verified

October 1, 2016

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 20091057
  • 09KC-01 (Other Grant/Funding Number: James and Esther King Biomedical Research Program)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Heart Failure

Clinical Trials on Cell Phone

3
Subscribe