Systematic Pain Assessment in Nursing Home Residents With Advanced Dementia

April 28, 2019 updated by: Liv Halvorsrud, Oslo Metropolitan University

Systematic Pain Assessment in Nursing Home Residents With Advanced Dementia; Effect on Pain Management and Patient Outcomes

It is estimated that 45-80 % of nursing home residents have substantial pain at any given time. Residents with impaired cognition have been found to report chronic pain more often, more frequent and more severe, compared to residents with normal cognition. Approximately 3/4 of permanent residents in nursing homes in Norway have developed dementia. The burden of dementia is often compounded by painful conditions. Despite over a decade of research on the subject, inadequate pain assessment and management remain significant problems among institutionalized older adults, with and without dementia. The poor pain management in patients with dementia has been attributed, at least in part, to difficulties with, and lack of, pain assessment in this population. Therefore, this study seek to determine the effect of regular pain assessment.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

The aim of the study is to determine the effect of regular pain assessment on pain management interventions applied and patient outcomes among patient with severe dementia.

A cluster randomized controlled trial will be conducted. A cluster is defined as a single independent nursing home. The clusters will be randomly assigned to either the experimental or control condition. Appropriate information will be given to both the intervention and the control group. All nurses in the experimental conditions will be taught how to administer the DOLOPLUS-2. The study will start after the initial education session. During the 3-month study period, the participating nursing staff will be asked to complete the DOLOPLUS-2 regularly. The control groups will receive standard methods of care. Data collection at baseline and at 4, 8 and 12 months.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

112

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • PB 4 Saint Olavs Plass
      • Oslo, PB 4 Saint Olavs Plass, Norway, N-0130
        • Faculty of Helath Science, Department of Nursing and Health Promotion

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

65 years and older (Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • ≥ 65 years old
  • Dementia diagnosis
  • Severe language impairment/non-communicative
  • Clinically significant pain and/or behavioral symptoms: a score of at least 44 on the Norwegian version of the Cohen-Mansfield Agitation Inventory (CMAI),
  • or a score of at least 4 (frequency × severity) on items of the Neuropsychiatric Inventory - Nursing Home Version (NPI-NH),
  • or an indication of clinically significant pain (≥ 5) according to the DOLOPLUS-2 at baseline

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Short term stay, < 4 weeks
  • Primary psychiatric diagnosis
  • Delirium

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: ITreatment arm: Pain Assessment
Pain assessment by Doloplus-2 pain scale regularly and additional pain assessment in situations where pain is suspected.
Pain assessment with assessment tools
No Intervention: Control arm: No treatment
Treatment us usual

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Change in analgesic intake measured in Defined Daily Dose (DDD) or a similar measure from baseline to 12 weeks. Will be assessed in both the Intervention and Control group.
Time Frame: 12 weeks
12 weeks
Change in pain score on the Dolplus-2 pain scale, and change in proportion scoring ≥ 5 on the Doloplus-2 scale from baseline to 12 week. Will be assessed in both the Intervention and Control group.
Time Frame: 12 weeks
12 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Change in psychotropic drug use from baseline to 12 weeks. Will be assessed in both the Intervention and Control group
Time Frame: 12 weeks
12 weeks
Change in NPS from baseline to 4, 8, 12 weeks. Will be assessed in both the Intervention and Control group
Time Frame: 4, 8, 12 weeks
4, 8, 12 weeks
Change in agitation measured with Brief Agitation Rating Scale (BARS) from baseline to 4 to 8 to 12 weeks. Will be assessed in both the Intervention and Control group.
Time Frame: 4, 8, 12 weeks
4, 8, 12 weeks
Change in QoL measured with QUALID from baseline to 12 weeks. Will be assessed in both the Intervention and Control group.
Time Frame: 12 weeks
12 weeks
Change in personal activity of daily living measured with the Physical Self Management Scale from baseline to 12 weeks. Will be assessed in both the Intervention and Control group.
Time Frame: 12 weeks
12 weeks
Nurses evaluation of systematic pain assessment tools by using a questionnaire developed for this study. Will be assessed in both the Intervention and Control group
Time Frame: 12 weeks
12 weeks
Pain management intervention applied when pain is detected with pain assessment tool Doloplus-2. Will be assessed for the Intervention group
Time Frame: 12 weeks
12 weeks
Validity and reliability of the Doloplus-2 pain scale.
Time Frame: 12 weeks
12 weeks
Convergent validity of three pain scales: the Doloplus-2, the Mobid-2 and the Checklist for non-verbal pain behavior.
Time Frame: Baseline - 12 weeks
Baseline - 12 weeks
Association between variables; pain, agitation, NPS, depression, ADL, QoL, analgesic use, psychotropic use Will be assessed in both the Intervention and Control group.
Time Frame: Baseline and 12 weeks
Baseline and 12 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Liv Halvorsrud, PhD, Associate professor

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 26, 2015

Primary Completion (Actual)

June 1, 2016

Study Completion (Actual)

March 17, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 12, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 25, 2016

First Posted (Estimate)

October 26, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 30, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 28, 2019

Last Verified

April 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Quality of Life

Clinical Trials on Pain assessment

Subscribe