CAMH - McMaster Collaborative Care Initiative For Mental Health Risk Factors In Dementia (CCI)

January 6, 2021 updated by: Tarek Rajji, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health

CAMH - McMaster Collaborative Care Initiative For Mental Health Risk Factors In Dementia: Depression, Anxiety, and Mild Cognitive Impairment

Age remains the single most significant risk factor for developing dementia, particularly Alzheimer's dementia (AD). Given the rate at which Canada's population is aging, the quest to determine modifiable risk factors, whether by prevention, earlier detection, or an ability to slow the rate of decline, is a key priority in health care. Primary care is likely to play a pivotal role in this initiative. Collaborative mental health care between primary care providers and mental health clinicians has been demonstrated to be effective at the patient and system levels. Thus, the overall goal of this project is to assess impact and feasibility of implementing a collaborative care evidence-based Integrated Care Pathway (ICP) in addressing three potentially reversible risk factors at high risk for developing AD: anxiety, depression, or mild cognitive impairment (MCI).

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The investigators will enroll 150 participants overall (CAMH and McMaster). Seventy-five will be cases who will be enrolled into the ICP arm of the study and these will be patients born in the calendar year 1951, 1953 or 1955. The investigators will enroll an additional 75 controls that were born in the calendar year 1950, 1952 or 1956.

Patients of general practitioners being seen at primary healthcare clinics in the Greater Toronto Area and in Hamilton, who were born in the calendar year 1950, 1951, 1952, 1953, 1955, or 1956 will be consented and screened for anxiety, depression, and Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI).

If patients born in 1951, 1953 and 1955 reach a threshold level of anxiety, depression, or MCI symptom burden and have a confirmed diagnosis, rather than receive treatment as usual, the participants will be enrolled into an Integrated Care Pathway (ICP), which offers evidence-informed treatment for the management of these syndromes in a routine, algorithmic fashion. All enrolled cases entered in the study will be provided with general interventions that address lifestyle and medical factors that both contribute to these syndromes and are thought to predispose patients to develop dementia. If the symptom burden is severe enough, based on standardized assessments, evidence-based psychopharmacology (a trial of sertraline and/or venlafaxine) will also be offered, with a standardized titration schedule. Collaboration will be built into the ICP - a psychiatrist will be present at the clinic and in contact with primary care providers to provide patient- and physician-level support, consultation, and episodes of care as necessary. Rates of anxiety, depression, and MCI diagnosis/detection, time to treatment initiation, and improvement in symptom burden will be assessed.

If patients born in 1950, 1952 and 1956 reach a threshold level of anxiety, depression, or MCI symptom burden, these individuals will form our comparison group and will receive treatment as usual (TAU).

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

145

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Ontario
      • Toronto, Ontario, Canada, M6J 1H4
        • Centre for Addiction and Mental Health

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

60 years to 65 years (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria

  1. Female or male primary practice patients of participating physicians born in 1951, 1953 or 1955 (ICP) and 1950, 1952 or 1956 (TAU).
  2. Can read and understand English.
  3. Corrected visual ability that enables reading of newspaper headlines and corrected hearing capacity that is adequate to respond to a raised conversational voice.
  4. Willing and able to provide informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Diagnosis of dementia.
  2. Substance abuse identified as an acute problem in the four weeks before being enrolled in the study (i.e. the day the patient signs the informed consent form).
  3. Those with delirium, or where we are unable to make a diagnosis of MCI, due to unstable comorbidities.
  4. Palliative-care patients.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: NON_RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: NONE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
EXPERIMENTAL: Enrolled Cases

Integrated Care Pathway with different treatment interventions

Interventions include:

Sertraline, Venlafaxine, CBT/Psychological therapy, Psychiatric consultation, lifestyle intervention resources

Other Names:
  • zoloft
Other Names:
  • effexor
NO_INTERVENTION: Enrolled Controls
No intervention: Treatment as usual (TAU) will be provided by the primary care practice staff

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in anxiety/depression/quality of life (QOL) scores among participants in the ICP and comparison groups
Time Frame: From Baseline Screening to 24 month follow-up
Comparison for the GAD-7/PHQ-9/QOL scores will be assessed using Group x Time ANOVAs repeated measure comparing scores at assessment times in the intervention and comparison groups.
From Baseline Screening to 24 month follow-up

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Acceptability and perceived utility of the ICP
Time Frame: Baseline to 24 month follow-up
Qualitative data will be gathered from primary care teams to determine the acceptability and perceived utility data from brief team meetings and focus groups.
Baseline to 24 month follow-up
Feasibility of the ICP
Time Frame: Baseline to 24 month follow-up
Qualitative data for the feasibility indicators will be obtained from the information collected by the research coordinator from the primary care team during the recruitment, screening, and data collection phases of the study, as well as the chart review.
Baseline to 24 month follow-up
Adjustments made for the adoption of the ICP in primary care teams
Time Frame: Baseline to 24 month follow-up
Qualitative data about the adjustments made at each primary care practice to adopt the ICP will be gathered from brief meetings and focus groups.
Baseline to 24 month follow-up
Barriers to implementation of the ICP and the key elements to initiate, sustain and spread the ICP
Time Frame: Baseline to 24 month follow-up
Qualitative data on difficulties with implementing the ICP, as well as information on successfully initiating and supporting the ICP will be gathered from brief meetings and focus groups
Baseline to 24 month follow-up
Changes in the primary care providers' knowledge of, and ability to recognize and manage, depression, anxiety, and MCI in older adults.
Time Frame: Baseline to 24 month follow-up
Mean ratings on the Primary Care Team Questionnaire will be calculated at baseline and at the end of the study and compared using t-tests.
Baseline to 24 month follow-up
Time-to-treatment initiation among those in the ICP arm versus those in the comparison arm.
Time Frame: Baseline to 24 month followup
The length of time from identification of anxiety, depression or MCI and the start of the ICP intervention (i.e., time-to-treatment initiation) will be calculated in days for patients in the intervention group and comparison group. The average length of time-to-treatment initiation will be calculated for each group and these means will be compared using a t-test.
Baseline to 24 month followup
Specific Aim 3a: To assess the impact of the ICP on the rates of diagnoses/detection among older patients with anxiety, depression, or MCI compared to before ICP implementation.
Time Frame: Calculate one year prior to the time of Site Initiation Visit for all recruiting sites.
During the recruitment phase of the study, charts of patients born in 1950, 1954 will be reviewed to identify diagnosis of depression, anxiety and/or MCI prior to the implementation of the ICP. The period of data collection for this chart review is calculated as one year prior to the time of the SIV for all sites.
Calculate one year prior to the time of Site Initiation Visit for all recruiting sites.
Specific Aim 3b: To assess the impact of ICP on rates of diagnoses/detection among patients of the same age cohort as our target ICP population, but not in our study sample.
Time Frame: Calculate the 6 month period prior to the last study assessment for a given recruitment site.
We will review contamination effects by reviewing the charts of clinic patients born in 1954 and 1958 to identify the diagnosis/detection of depression, anxiety and/or MCI in the 6 month period prior to the last study assessment for a given recruitment site.
Calculate the 6 month period prior to the last study assessment for a given recruitment site.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Collaborators

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Tarek Rajji, MD, Center for Addiction and Mental Health

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

March 30, 2016

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

July 16, 2020

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

July 16, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 24, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 2, 2016

First Posted (ESTIMATE)

November 4, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

January 7, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 6, 2021

Last Verified

January 1, 2021

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Depression

Clinical Trials on Sertraline

3
Subscribe