" Effect of Affordance of Objects on the Memory: Study in Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation " (SIMULANG-TMS)

April 26, 2017 updated by: Centre Hospitalier St Anne

" Effect of Affordance of Objects on the Memory: Study in Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation " (SIMULANG-TMS)

The purpose of this study is determine the involvement of motor system in the memory of manipulable objects. The idea is to stimulate the ventral premotor cortex with transcranial magnetic stimulation to see whether this stimulation will affect memory of manipulable objects.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Embodied cognition claims that representations shares processing resources with sensorimotor systems. More specifically, it has been proposed that language comprehension relies on internal simulation of the meaning. For instance, numerous studies have shown that the processing of action-related concepts involve a motor activation similar to when the action is actually performed. However, even if those studies show clearly that action-related concepts involve a motor activation, such activations may be incidental to the activation of their representations, rather than part of it. Another way to show that this motor component takes part in the representation of manipulable objetcs is to investigate whether an impairment of motor system would impair the memory of manipulable object. In this study, investigators will use Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS) to stimulate ventral premotor cortex (PMv) to see whether this stimulation will affect memory of manipulable objects, but not memory of nonmanipulable objects. For this purpose, three TMS conditions will be assessed: cTBS to inhibit the motor cortex, iTBS to excite the motor cortex, and a SHAM condition as control.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

30

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 35 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • 18 and 35 years
  • Right-handers (score between 70 and 100 on the scale of Edinburgh)
  • Native language : French
  • Not depressed (score lower than 14 in the BDI)
  • health insurance
  • Consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Psychiatric family history up to the second degree
  • Medical treatment, in particular psychotropic being able to affect the memory and the attention
  • view or hearing disorders (not compensated)
  • neurological histories (epilepsy, alcoholism in particular) or psychiatric or important memory complaints
  • Contraindications for the SMT
  • contraindications in the MRI

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Other
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Other: Group iTBS-cTBS-SHAM
PMv stimulation (iTBS) at session 2, PMv inhibition (cTBS) at session 3, and control (SHAM) at session 4
PMv stimulation (iTBS)
PMv inhibition (cTBS)
Control (SHAM)
Other: Group iTBS-SHAM-cTBS
PMv stimulation (iTBS) at session 2, control (SHAM) at session 3, and PMv inhibition (cTBS) at session 4
PMv stimulation (iTBS)
PMv inhibition (cTBS)
Control (SHAM)
Other: Group cTBS-iTBS-SHAM
PMv inhibition (cTBS) at session 2, PMv stimulation (iTBS) at session 3, and control (SHAM) at session 4
PMv stimulation (iTBS)
PMv inhibition (cTBS)
Control (SHAM)
Other: Group cTBS-SHAM-iTBS
PMv inhibition (cTBS) at session 2, control (SHAM) at session 3, and PMv stimulation (iTBS) at session 4
PMv stimulation (iTBS)
PMv inhibition (cTBS)
Control (SHAM)
Other: Group SHAM-iTBS-cTBS
control (SHAM) at session 2, PMv stimulation (iTBS) at session 3, and PMv inhibition (cTBS) at session 4
PMv stimulation (iTBS)
PMv inhibition (cTBS)
Control (SHAM)
Other: Group SHAM-cTBS-iTBS
control (SHAM) at session 2, PMv inhibition (cTBS) at session 3, and PMv stimulation (iTBS) at session 4
PMv stimulation (iTBS)
PMv inhibition (cTBS)
Control (SHAM)

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of objects affordants and of objects not - affordants reminded
Time Frame: 1 week
Measure of the number of objects affordants and of objects not - affordants reminded according to if the stimulation is in PMv or control
1 week
Number of objects affordants and of objects not - affordants reminded
Time Frame: 2 weeks
Measure of the number of objects affordants and of objects not - affordants reminded according to if the stimulation is in PMv or control
2 weeks
Number of objects affordants and of objects not - affordants reminded
Time Frame: 3 weeks
Measure of the number of objects affordants and of objects not - affordants reminded according to if the stimulation is in PMv or control
3 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of object reminded
Time Frame: 1 week
Measure of the number of objects affordants and of objects not - affordants reminded according to if the stimulation is excitation or control
1 week
Number of object reminded
Time Frame: 2 weeks
Measure of the number of objects affordants and of objects not - affordants reminded according to if the stimulation is excitation or control
2 weeks
Number of object reminded
Time Frame: 3 weeks
Measure of the number of objects affordants and of objects not - affordants reminded according to if the stimulation is excitation or control
3 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: Pascale PIOLINO, University of Paris 5 - Rene Descartes
  • Study Director: Benoit CREPON, MD, CHSA

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

April 3, 2017

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

July 1, 2018

Study Completion (Anticipated)

November 1, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 20, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 3, 2016

First Posted (Estimate)

November 6, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 28, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 26, 2017

Last Verified

April 1, 2017

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • D15-P13

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

Undecided

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Healthy

Clinical Trials on PMv stimulation (iTBS)

3
Subscribe