A Study of Intranasal Live Attenuated Influenza Vaccine Immunogenicity and Associations With the Nasopharyngeal Microbiome Among Children in the Gambia (NASIMMUNE)

A Study of Intranasal Live Attenuated Influenza Vaccine Immunogenicity and Associations With the Nasopharyngeal Microbiome Among Children in the Gambia - The NASIMMUNE Study

The live attenuated influenza vaccine (LAIV) is made up of weakened influenza viruses given into the nose and in early studies was shown to be better than the standard influenza vaccine at preventing infections in children. However, more recently, it has performed less well and it may also work less well in Sub-Saharan Africa. Not only do the investigators not know why this is, but the investigators also do not fully understand why LAIV produces stronger nasal antibody responses in some individuals but not others. Usually harmless bacteria that are present in participants noses can influence how our immune system works and variations in these may explain differences in how LAIV works. The project will recruit children given LAIV in the Gambia to gain further understanding of these issues.

The investigators will measure a variety of responses to LAIV, including genes that can change their expression early after vaccination and use advanced computational techniques to identify new relationships between these genes and other LAIV responses. The investigators will also see whether nasal bacterial profiles in children who respond to LAIV are different from those who do not. In addition, the investigators will alter these bacteria in a subset of children with antibiotics and see whether this affects both nasal gene expression and later responses to LAIV.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

Purpose The overall goal of this study is to conduct at detailed immunogenicity study of intranasal live attenuated influenza vaccine (LAIV; Nasovac-S, Serum Institute of India Pvt. Ltd.), including identification of early molecular signatures associated with a robust mucosal immune response. In addition, the study team will explore whether the nasopharyngeal microbiome influences this immune response and whether LAIV has an impact on the microbiome.

A total of 365 healthy children aged 24 - 59 months will be recruited in The Gambia for this study.

Background Both the burden of infection and use of influenza vaccines in children from sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) have been neglected. There are limited immunogenicity or efficacy data from SSA of the widely used Ann Arbor strain-derived LAIV. This LAIV was shown to have greater relative efficacy compared to inactivated influenza vaccine in children in early randomized-controlled trials. There has, however, been concern regarding lower vaccine effectiveness in the US in recent years.

The Serum Institute of India Pvt. Ltd. has recently developed a trivalent LAIV (Nasovac-S) via a WHO facilitated donation of a Russian-derived LAIV, with the intention of scaling up provision of LAIV to resource-limited settings. Based on initial safety and immunogenicity data, Nasovac-S was licensed in India and granted a WHO prequalification certificate in 2015. Two placebo-controlled efficacy studies using Nasovac-S were recently undertaken in Bangladesh and Senegal (in children aged 24 - 59 months and 24 - 71 months respectively), providing mixed and contrasting results. In Senegal, no efficacy was found against the circulating pandemic H1N1 influenza strain (-9.7%, 95% CI -62.6, 26.1). In Bangladesh the overall vaccine efficacy to vaccine-matched strains, in a study of identical design, was 57.5% (95% CI 43.6, 68.0), with efficacy against H1N1 and H3N2, 50.0% (95% CI 9.2, 72.5) and 60.4% (95% CI 44.8, 71.6) respectively. The reason for the discrepancy in these studies or the poorer performance of the H1N1 component is not clear and emphasizes the need to undertake detailed immunogenicity studies of this vaccine in SSA. On a wider note, the exact immunological mechanisms of action of LAIV are also under-explored.

Study type:

Interventional

Design:

All primary objectives will be addressed through the conduct of a phase 4, randomized, controlled clinical vaccine trial. A total of 330 healthy children aged 24 - 59 months will be enrolled into one of three groups of equal size (3 x 110 children):

(i) LAIV-vaccinated (Group A - blood sample at day 0, 2, 21) (ii) LAIV-vaccinated (Group B - blood sample at day 0, 7, 21) (iii) Control group (Group C)

The study is not blinded, but group allocation will be concealed from the investigator team and block randomization stratified by sex will be undertaken.

Two LAIV-vaccinated groups are included in order to achieve several exploratory objectives, which require blood sampling at different times following vaccination, whilst minimizing the number of times children are bled. The unvaccinated subjects will serve as a control group for the primary objective of assessing the impact of LAIV on the nasopharyngeal microbiome.

An additional 35 healthy children aged 24 - 59 months will be recruited in the 2nd phase of recruitment (approximately Jan - June 2018) to assess how modulation of the nasopharyngeal microbiome with antibiotics impacts the mucosal immunogenicity to LAIV. These subjects will be matched as closely as possible by pre-antibiotic nasopharyngeal microbiome profile, age and sex (in that order of preference), in an exploratory nested case-control study, to n = 35 children recruited in the main clinical trial.

Official title A Study of Intranasal Live Attenuated Influenza Vaccine Immunogenicity and Associations with the Nasopharyngeal Microbiome Among Children in the Gambia (The NASIMMUNE study)

Primary outcome measures

  • To identify novel early systemic and mucosal molecular signatures following LAIV that are associated with subsequent robust nasal and oral influenza-specific immunoglobulin A (IgA) responses, in order to provide insight into the mechanisms of successful mucosal immunization
  • To identify associations between nasopharyngeal microbiota and nasal and oral influenza-specific IgA responses post-LAIV in Gambian children, to explore whether microbiome variability can explain suboptimal immune responses in some individuals to live intranasal mucosal vaccines in Sub-Saharan Africa
  • To establish whether LAIV impacts the nasopharyngeal microbiome, with a specific focus on the burden of S. pneumoniae

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

364

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Banjul, Gambia
        • Medical Research Council unit The Gambia

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

2 years to 4 years (Child)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • • Healthy male or female child at least 24 months of age and less than 60 months of age at the time of study entry.

    • Resident in the study area and with no plans to travel outside the study area during the period of subject participation.
    • Informed consent for the study participation obtained from a parent (or guardian only if neither parent is alive or if guardianship has been legally transferred (see section 11.2).
    • Willingness and capacity to comply with the study protocol as judged by a member of the clinical trial team.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • • Serious, active, medical condition, including but not limited to:

    • chronic disease of any body system
    • severe protein-energy malnutrition (weight-for-height Z-score of less than -3)
    • known genetic disorders, such as Down's syndrome or other cytogenetic disorder

      • Active wheezing
      • History of documented hypersensitivity to eggs or other components of the vaccine (including gelatin, sorbitol, lactalbumin and chicken protein), or with life-threatening reactions to previous influenza vaccinations.
      • History of documented hypersensitivity to macrolide antibiotics
      • History of Guillain-Barré syndrome.
      • Receipt of aspirin therapy or aspirin-containing therapy within the two weeks before planned study vaccination.
      • Any suspected or confirmed congenital or acquired state of immune deficiency including but not limited to primary immunodeficiencies including thymus disorders, HIV/AIDS, hematological or lymphoid malignancies (blood tests will not be routinely undertaken with this regard as part of the study).
      • Any current immunosuppressive/immunomodulatory treatment or receipt of any such treatment within the six months preceding trial enrolment (for corticosteroids this is defined as a dose of prednisolone (or equivalent) of greater than 2mg/kg/day for one week or 1mg/kg/day for one month. The use of topical corticosteroids is not an exclusion criterion.
      • The use of inhaled corticosteroids within the last one month.
      • Receipt of an influenza vaccine within the past 12 months.
      • Has any condition determined by investigator as likely to interfere with evaluation of the vaccine or be a significant potential health risk to the child or make it unlikely that the child would complete the study.
      • Any significant signs or symptoms of an acute illness or infection including:
    • an axillary temperature of 38.0°C or above or documented fever of 38°C or above in the preceding 14 days.
    • Any acute respiratory infection within 14 days of enrollment visit. If the reason for ineligibility is likely to be temporary (e.g. a fever of 38°C or above or acute respiratory infection) and either will or may resolve before the infant reaches 60 months, they will not be recorded as a screening failure but instead will be re-screened within an appropriate future time-window (e.g. at least 14 days after the last documented fever of 38°C or above or resolution of respiratory illness) and a decision made regarding eligibility at that point.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: LAIV-vaccinated group 1
Nasovac-S vaccination group A , blood samples days 0, 2, 21
one of 0.5ml intranasal dose of trivalent live attenuated vaccine (LAIV)
Experimental: LAIV-vaccinated group 2
Nasovac-S vaccination group B, blood samples at days 0, 7, 21
one of 0.5ml intranasal dose of trivalent live attenuated vaccine (LAIV)
No Intervention: Unvaccinated
control group C
Experimental: Oral Azithromycin & vaccination
group D - a single dose of oral Azithromycin will be given 28 days prior to Nasovac-S vaccination
one of 0.5ml intranasal dose of trivalent live attenuated vaccine (LAIV)
a single dose of Azithromycin (liquid formulation - Zithromax) at 20mg/Kg (up to a maximum adult dose 1g) to be given to a subset of subjects
Other Names:
  • Zithromax

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
nasal IgA response
Time Frame: 21 days post LAIV
Influenza specific nasal IgA responses
21 days post LAIV
fold increase in oral fluid influenza-specific/total IgA ratio
Time Frame: day 0 - Day 21
day 0 - Day 21
fold increase in oral fluid influenza-specific/total IgG ratio
Time Frame: Day 0 - Day 21
Day 0 - Day 21

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
density of S. Pneumoniae
Time Frame: day 7 and day 21 after LAIV compared to day 0
density of S. Pneumoniae before and after LAIV as established by quantitative PCR
day 7 and day 21 after LAIV compared to day 0
Changes in the relative abundance of different operational taxanomic units (OTUs) of nasopharyngeal microbiota
Time Frame: day 7 and day 21 compared to day 0 in each participant
day 7 and day 21 compared to day 0 in each participant
gene expression changes in nasal and systemic samples
Time Frame: 2 days after LAIV
2 days after LAIV

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 30, 2017

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 19, 2018

Study Completion (Actual)

May 23, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 17, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 23, 2016

First Posted (Estimate)

November 25, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

February 21, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 20, 2020

Last Verified

February 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Influenza

Clinical Trials on Nasovac-S

3
Subscribe