- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT02975921
Betadine Pleurodesis Via Tunneled Pleural Catheters
Efficacy of Povidone-Iodine Instillation Via Tunneled Pleural Catheters in Achieving Pleurodesis: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Tunneled pleural catheter (TPC) placement is a routine clinical procedure used in the setting of recurrent pleural effusions. The most common clinical indication is malignant pleural effusion but these can be used in benign pleural effusions as well (such as those due to congestive heart failure, cirrhosis, etc). The primary benefit of TPC placement is relief of dyspnea without the need for recurrent procedures.
Despite success at relieving dyspnea, there are problems with the long-term placement of TPC's. One risk is infection which is estimated at 5%. Furthermore, each drainage kit costs approximately $100 and is often paid out-of-pocket by patients. Over time, this may create a substantial cost burden. Finally, most patients who undergo TPC placement require home drainage by visiting nurses. This is a significant resource utilization and it often requires interruption of a patient's home routines via the visitation requirements.
Occasionally, the effusion no longer reaccumulates following TPC placement. In malignant effusions, this pleurodesis (see below) occurs up to 50% of the time in malignant effusions. When pleurodesis occurs, the TPC may be removed by a simple office procedure.
Pleurodesis, or the act of inducing scarring and obliteration of the potential space between the visceral and parietal pleura where pleural effusions develop, is a different mechanism of providing relief of dyspnea. In the USA in particular, the most common agent used for pleurodesis (talc) is associated with complications such as respiratory failure and adult respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), a life-threatening condition. Talc is also very expensive.
Povidone-Iodine, an agent used for pleurodesis in many other countries, has been shown to be highly efficacious when given via other modalities. Studies report a pleurodesis rate of 90+% with Povidone-Iodine. It also has a favorable safety record and is inexpensive.
Given all of these factors, the investigators propose a prospective study using Povidone-Iodine at the time of TPC placement to promote pleurodesis. The investigators hypothesize that pleurodesis will occur quickly and frequently, thus enabling removal of the TPC, thereby saving cost, risks of infection, all while improving patients quality of life.
The investigators plan on doing this by enrolling patients prospectively who are to undergo TPC placement as part of their standard care. These patients would be prospectively enrolled and randomized to receive either usual care (no pleurodesis) or the investigational medication (povidone-iodine) intrapleurally at time of procedure. The investigators would subdivide groups prospectively between patients who have malignant pleural effusions and those who have benign (non-malignant) pleural effusions.
Following TPC placement and medication administration (if necessary), nursing and investigative physicians would then immediately follow them in the recovery area (to monitor for any negative immediate outcomes such as hypertension, hypotension, reactions, or significant pain) and in clinic as per their usual care (starting 1-2 weeks after discharge and as long as necessary). The investigators would monitor them for the outcomes as noted elsewhere.
Study Type
Phase
- Phase 4
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Requiring Tunneled Catheter Placement for a Pleural Effusion
Exclusion Criteria:
- Patient with a nonexpandable lung
- Non-english speaker
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Single
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
No Intervention: Malignant Effusion - Usual Care
Patients who had a pleural effusion secondary to a malignant etiology and subsequently underwent tunneled pleural catheter (TPC) placement and had usual care during and afterwards.
Usual care is the TPC only with no intrapleural medications.
They would have nursing care in the recovery area afterwards and home nursing three times weekly.
|
|
|
Experimental: Malignant Effusion with Pleurodesis
Patients who had a pleural effusion secondary to a malignant etiology and subsequently underwent tunneled pleural catheter (TPC) placement and had intrapleural Povidone-Iodine administered at time of placement (100mL of 2% solution).
They would have nursing care in the recovery area afterwards and home nursing three times weekly.
|
Intrapleural administration of Povidone-Iodine
Other Names:
|
|
No Intervention: Benign Effusion - Usual Care
Patients who had a pleural effusion secondary to a benign etiology and subsequently underwent tunneled pleural catheter (TPC) placement and had usual care during and afterwards.
Usual care is the TPC only with no intrapleural medications.
They would have nursing care in the recovery area afterwards and home nursing three times weekly.
|
|
|
Experimental: Benign Effusion with Pleurodesis
Patients who had a pleural effusion secondary to a benign etiology and subsequently underwent tunneled pleural catheter (TPC) placement and had intrapleural Povidone-Iodine administered at time of placement (100mL of 2% solution).
They would have nursing care in the recovery area afterwards and home nursing three times weekly.
|
Intrapleural administration of Povidone-Iodine
Other Names:
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Time to Tunneled Pleural Catheter Removal
Time Frame: 0-6 months
|
The time (in days) between Tunneled Pleural Catheter (TPC) placement to eventual removal within 6 months
|
0-6 months
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Pleurodesis Rate
Time Frame: 2 months
|
Rate of patients who achieved successful pleurodesis within 2 months as defined as successful TPC removal with no reaccumulation of pleural effusion on subsequent imaging (usually 2-3 weeks later).
Typical for usual care is 45-50%.
In observational studies using povidone-iodine pleurodesis in other manners (not via TPC), a 90% pleurodesis rate was observed (which should be similar to our study with intervention).
|
2 months
|
|
Infection Rate
Time Frame: 6 months
|
Any skin/site infections or empyemas (pleural based infections) noted within 6 months of TPC placement.
The longer a TPC is in place, the higher the rate of infection we would expect.
The expected infection rate is between 5-25% at 2 months and this should be dramatically lower in the intervention arm as most of them will have their TPCs removed within 1 week or so.
|
6 months
|
|
Death
Time Frame: 6 months
|
Any deaths that occur and how long after TPC placement and the patients age at death.
As patients are quite systemically ill when they receive TPCs, these comorbidities would be expected to be the primary drivers of patient mortality.
Typical values seen in the literature is a mortality rate of 30-70% at 6 months.
There should be essentially no difference between groups.
|
6 months
|
|
Mechanical Complications
Time Frame: 6 months
|
Any mechanical complications related to the TPC itself such as catheter malfunction or accidental removal.
This would be a rare complication and the expected rate will be <5%.
The incidence of this will rise the longer it is in place for.
|
6 months
|
|
Baseline Borg Dyspnea Index
Time Frame: Baseline
|
The Borg Dyspnea Index is a standardized, validated tool to measure a patient's dyspnea.
This will be measured at baseline prior to Tunneled Pleural Catheter Placement.
|
Baseline
|
|
Borg Dyspnea Index at 2 weeks
Time Frame: 2 weeks
|
The Borg Dyspnea Index is a standardized, validated tool to measure a patient's dyspnea.
This will be measured 2 weeks after tunneled pleural catheter placement.
|
2 weeks
|
|
Borg Dyspnea Index at 2 months
Time Frame: 2 months
|
The Borg Dyspnea Index is a standardized, validated tool to measure a patient's dyspnea.
This will be measured 2 months after tunneled pleural catheter placement.
|
2 months
|
|
Borg Dyspnea Index at 4 months
Time Frame: 4 months
|
The Borg Dyspnea Index is a standardized, validated tool to measure a patient's dyspnea.
This will be measured 4 months after tunneled pleural catheter placement.
|
4 months
|
|
Borg Dyspnea Index at 6 months
Time Frame: 6 months
|
The Borg Dyspnea Index is a standardized, validated tool to measure a patient's dyspnea.
This will be measured 6 months after tunneled pleural catheter placement.
|
6 months
|
|
Quality of Life Questionnaire at Baseline
Time Frame: Baseline
|
Quality of Life will be measured via a WHOQOL-BREF questionnaire which is a standardized, validated tool to measure a patient's quality of life.
This will be measured at baseline prior to the procedure.
|
Baseline
|
|
Quality of Life Questionnaire at 2 weeks
Time Frame: 2 weeks
|
Quality of Life will be measured via a WHOQOL-BREF questionnaire which is a standardized, validated tool to measure a patient's quality of life.
This will be measured 2 weeks after TPC placement.
|
2 weeks
|
|
Quality of Life Questionnaire at 2 months
Time Frame: 2 months
|
Quality of Life will be measured via a WHOQOL-BREF questionnaire which is a standardized, validated tool to measure a patient's quality of life.
This will be measured 2 months after TPC placement.
|
2 months
|
|
Quality of Life Questionnaire at 4 months
Time Frame: 4 months
|
Quality of Life will be measured via a WHOQOL-BREF questionnaire which is a standardized, validated tool to measure a patient's quality of life.
This will be measured 4 months after TPC placement.
|
4 months
|
|
Quality of Life Questionnaire at 6 months
Time Frame: 6 months
|
Quality of Life will be measured via a WHOQOL-BREF questionnaire which is a standardized, validated tool to measure a patient's quality of life.
This will be measured 6 months after TPC placement.
|
6 months
|
|
Baseline Pain
Time Frame: Baseline
|
Pain at baseline - immediately prior to procedure.
|
Baseline
|
|
Pain 2 hours after procedure
Time Frame: 2 hours after procedure
|
Pain at 2 hours after the procedure.
|
2 hours after procedure
|
|
Pain 6 hours after procedure
Time Frame: 6 hours after procedure
|
Pain at 6 hours after the procedure.
|
6 hours after procedure
|
|
Immediate hemodynamic reactions following betadine administration
Time Frame: 0-6 hours after procedure
|
Any severe hemodynamic fluctuations (such as severe hypotension or hypertension) noted after the procedure.
The patient will monitored by nursing staff in a recovery area and any events will be noted immediately.
The expected rate of this is <5%.
|
0-6 hours after procedure
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Ahmed L, Ip H, Rao D, Patel N, Noorzad F. Talc pleurodesis through indwelling pleural catheters for malignant pleural effusions: retrospective case series of a novel clinical pathway. Chest. 2014 Dec;146(6):e190-e194. doi: 10.1378/chest.14-0394.
- Agarwal R, Khan A, Aggarwal AN, Gupta D. Efficacy & safety of iodopovidone pleurodesis: a systematic review & meta-analysis. Indian J Med Res. 2012 Mar;135(3):297-304.
- Hak CC, Sivakumar P, Ahmed L. Safety of indwelling pleural catheter use in patients undergoing chemotherapy: a five-year retrospective evaluation. BMC Pulm Med. 2016 Mar 11;16:41. doi: 10.1186/s12890-016-0203-7.
- Light RW. Pleural effusions. Med Clin North Am. 2011 Nov;95(6):1055-70. doi: 10.1016/j.mcna.2011.08.005. Epub 2011 Sep 25.
- Penz ED, Mishra EK, Davies HE, Manns BJ, Miller RF, Rahman NM. Comparing cost of indwelling pleural catheter vs talc pleurodesis for malignant pleural effusion. Chest. 2014 Oct;146(4):991-1000. doi: 10.1378/chest.13-2481.
- Van Meter ME, McKee KY, Kohlwes RJ. Efficacy and safety of tunneled pleural catheters in adults with malignant pleural effusions: a systematic review. J Gen Intern Med. 2011 Jan;26(1):70-6. doi: 10.1007/s11606-010-1472-0. Epub 2010 Aug 10.
- Walker S, Bibby AC, Maskell NA. Current best practice in the evaluation and management of malignant pleural effusions. Ther Adv Respir Dis. 2017 Feb;11(2):105-114. doi: 10.1177/1753465816671697. Epub 2016 Oct 24.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Anticipated)
Primary Completion (Anticipated)
Study Completion (Anticipated)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Estimate)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
- Heart Diseases
- Cardiovascular Diseases
- Respiratory Tract Diseases
- Neoplasms
- Neoplasms by Site
- Pleural Diseases
- Respiratory Tract Neoplasms
- Thoracic Neoplasms
- Pleural Neoplasms
- Heart Failure
- Pleural Effusion, Malignant
- Pleural Effusion
- Anti-Infective Agents, Local
- Anti-Infective Agents
- Plasma Substitutes
- Blood Substitutes
- Povidone-Iodine
- Povidone
Other Study ID Numbers
- 2000020017
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.