Trans-spinal Direct Current Stimulation in Primary Orthostatic Tremor (STOP)

To explore the effect of cathodal tsDCS vs sham tsDCS in primary orthostatic tremor. The investigators hypothesize that cathodal tsDCS but not sham tsDCS would be able to restore both motor and sensory pathways of the spinal cord leading to functional improvements.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Regain of function and improvement of motor skills is a major challenge in motor disorders in which spinal cord functions play a key role. The growing development of non-invasive brain stimulations in the past decade led to significant progress in the understanding of neuronal abnormalities in patients with movement disorders that opens up new vistas for experimental treatments. However, these treatments are currently limited due to their high cost and lack of possibility to use in outpatients. Recently, trans-spinal direct current stimulation (tsDCS) has emerged as a novel tool to modulate non-invasively spinal cord excitability. This may be an excellent alternative to epidural stimulation, the sole technique available up to now to alter spinal functions in an invasive fashion. The overall goal of this study is to assess the potential of tsDCS to restore spinal cord functions in patients with primary orthostatic tremor (POT), a disorder with little or no current therapeutic resources and high disability for patients.

Using a crossover, randomized, double-blinded approach, cathodal (2mA, 20 min) or sham tsDCS (with the active electrodes over the thoracic level and the reference electrode on the right shoulder) will be delivered to 15 patients with POT. The maximal time in upright position determined by a force platform, the cortical excitability assessed by transcranial magnetic stimulation (input / output curve of the tibialis anterior muscle and short-latency afferent inhibition) and EMG activities of lower extremity muscles will be measured before (PRE), immediately and 30 minutes after current offset (POST0 and POST30 respectively). Cathodal and sham tsDCS will be delivered in two different sessions with a washout period of at least 7 days. The investigators anticipate that cathodal tsDCS but not sham tsDCS will be able to modulate both sensory and motor functions in POT and will, in turn, lead to functional improvement.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

18

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Paris, France, 75013
        • Centre investigation clinique

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 85 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with POT diagnosed since at least 1 year
  • Normal neurological examination with the exception of POT
  • Patients with or without treatment for TOP, or with treatment not sufficiently effective
  • Affiliated with the French social security scheme, universal medical coverages (CMU), or an equivalent scheme
  • Signed informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Psychiatric or neurological conditions (with the exception of POT)
  • Presence of potential tsDCS risk factors including an electrically, magnetically or mechanically activated implant (including cardiac pacemaker, epidural stimulation electrodes, etc.), an intravascular clip or any other electrically sensitive support system, damaged skin at the stimulation sites (i.e., skin with ingrown hairs, acne, razor nicks, wounds that have not healed, recent scar tissue, broken skin, etc.)
  • Presence of TMS risk factor including cardiac pacemaker, history of epilepsy, traumatic brain injury with loss of consciousness, intracerebral clips, cochlear or ocular implants
  • Pregnancy in women (as determined by a urine pregnancy test in pre-menopausal women), or lactating women or women planning pregnancy during the course of the study
  • Patients enrolled in another biomedical research at the time of the study
  • Participant who does not wish to be informed of any clinically relevant abnormalities (as determined by the investigators) identified during the course of the study
  • Patient under guardianship or curatorship, or under judicial supervision

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Other
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Cathodal tsDCS
20 min of active treatment
20 min of treatment applied at the thoracic level (active electrode) with reference placed on the right shoulder
Sham Comparator: Sham tsDCS
20 min of sham treatment
20 min of treatment applied at the thoracic level (active electrode) with reference placed on the right shoulder

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in maximal time in the upright position without support
Time Frame: Before (PRE) and immediately after current offset (POST0)
Force plateform
Before (PRE) and immediately after current offset (POST0)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Quantitative assessment of tremor (EMG)
Time Frame: Before (PRE), immediately after (POST0) and 30min (POST30) current offset
Before (PRE), immediately after (POST0) and 30min (POST30) current offset
Cortical excitability assessed by Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation
Time Frame: Before (PRE), immediately after (POST0) and 30min (POST30) current offset
Before (PRE), immediately after (POST0) and 30min (POST30) current offset

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Marie Vidailhet, MD, marie.vidailhet@psl.aphp.fr

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 17, 2017

Primary Completion (Actual)

November 1, 2017

Study Completion (Actual)

November 28, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 22, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 28, 2016

First Posted (Estimate)

December 1, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

August 25, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 24, 2021

Last Verified

August 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • C16-26
  • 2016-A01202-49 (Registry Identifier: IDRCB)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Primary Orthostatic Tremor

Clinical Trials on tsDCS

3
Subscribe