- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT02990234
Capsular Repair in FAI Impingement Surgery
November 29, 2017 updated by: University of Colorado, Denver
The Efficacy of Capsular Repair in Arthroscopic Femoroacetabular
The Investigator's hypothesis is that capsular repair (after CAM or mixed Femoroacetabular Impingement (FAI) surgery) requiring moderate capsulotomy, would result in similar patient outcomes in the short, mid and long term, both clinically and radiographically, compared to those without capsular repair.
The objective of this clinical trial is to evaluate the clinical efficacy with regards to pain, range of motion and return to work and activities of daily living.
Secondary objective is to evaluate radiographic characteristics between both groups.
Study Overview
Status
Completed
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Interventional
Enrollment (Actual)
23
Phase
- Not Applicable
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
16 years to 51 years (Child, Adult)
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Genders Eligible for Study
All
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Male or female patients aged between 16-51 years of age.
- Healthy patients undergoing hip arthroscopy due to Cam or mixed FAI
- No major osteoarthritic (OA) changes according to X-Ray and surgery observation (Tonnis 0-1)
- No previous hip surgery
- No other influential disabilities in lower limbs
- No chronic use of NSAID, analgesics, steroids or chemotherapy drugs
- Base line activity level (Tegner 3 and above)
Exclusion Criteria:
- Patients with concomitant disease that may affect joints
- Patients with major ligamentous laxity
- Patients who have undergone only minor vertical capsulotomy (as in small pincer only lesions)
- Patients with extreme range of motion needs (such as ballet dancers)
- Patients suffering from connective tissue disease
- Patients suffering from bilateral symptomatic FAI that are being operated on for their first hip
- Patients with relative or proven dysplastic hip determined by center edge angle and/or extreme version abnormalities as measured on apical CT/MR cuts and pelvic XR
- Patients who needed Ilio-Psoas release
- Patients whose cartilage hip status was defined as advanced OA during surgery
- Patients who following surgery would be instructed to avoid full weight bearing on the operated hip for more than 4 weeks
- Concomitant use of PRP (platelet rich plasma) or hyaluronic acid during the surgical procedure
- Patients with preoperative hip stiffness
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Single
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Active Comparator: Capsular Repair
Capsular Repair arm.
The first hip is randomized, opposite treatment on second hip.
One Hip will receive the capsular repair while the other hip will not.
|
|
|
Placebo Comparator: No Capsular Repair
Placebo arm.
One hip is randomized to capsular repair while the other hip has no capsular repair.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Time Frame |
|---|---|
|
Change in iHOT Version 12
Time Frame: Baseline, 6weeks, 12weeks, 6months, 1Year, 2Years
|
Baseline, 6weeks, 12weeks, 6months, 1Year, 2Years
|
Other Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Change in Marx activity score
Time Frame: Baseline, 6weeks, 12weeks, 6months, 1Year, 2Years
|
Baseline, 6weeks, 12weeks, 6months, 1Year, 2Years
|
|
|
Change in Range of Motion
Time Frame: Baseline, 14days, 6weeks, 12weeks, 6months, 1Year, 2Years
|
Baseline, 14days, 6weeks, 12weeks, 6months, 1Year, 2Years
|
|
|
Change in X-rays
Time Frame: 6weeks, 6months, 1Year
|
XR will be used for initial evaluation and for post op resection assessment and long-term OA changes.
X-rays will be done post-operatively at 6 weeks, 6 months and 1 year time-frames.
All these x-rays are normally performed as standard of care.
|
6weeks, 6months, 1Year
|
|
Change in MRI
Time Frame: 6weeks, 6months
|
MRI will be conducted at 6 weeks and 6 months post op to evaluate capsular healing status (primary radiological outcome measure), intra articular adhesions, extra articular scarring, labrum/cartilage status and resection assessment.
This MRI will be paid by department funds.
|
6weeks, 6months
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Sponsor
Publications and helpful links
The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.
General Publications
- Kelly BT, Weiland DE, Schenker ML, Philippon MJ. Arthroscopic labral repair in the hip: surgical technique and review of the literature. Arthroscopy. 2005 Dec;21(12):1496-504. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2005.08.013.
- Byrd JW. Hip arthroscopy. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2006 Jul;14(7):433-44. doi: 10.5435/00124635-200607000-00006. No abstract available.
- Bowman KF Jr, Fox J, Sekiya JK. A clinically relevant review of hip biomechanics. Arthroscopy. 2010 Aug;26(8):1118-29. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2010.01.027.
- Philippon MJ, Schenker ML. Arthroscopy for the treatment of femoroacetabular impingement in the athlete. Clin Sports Med. 2006 Apr;25(2):299-308, ix. doi: 10.1016/j.csm.2005.12.006.
- Ranawat AS, McClincy M, Sekiya JK. Anterior dislocation of the hip after arthroscopy in a patient with capsular laxity of the hip. A case report. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2009 Jan;91(1):192-7. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.G.01367. No abstract available.
- Matsuda DK. Acute iatrogenic dislocation following hip impingement arthroscopic surgery. Arthroscopy. 2009 Apr;25(4):400-4. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2008.12.011. Epub 2009 Feb 1.
- Benali Y, Katthagen BD. Hip subluxation as a complication of arthroscopic debridement. Arthroscopy. 2009 Apr;25(4):405-7. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2009.01.012.
- Ilizaliturri VM Jr, Byrd JW, Sampson TG, Guanche CA, Philippon MJ, Kelly BT, Dienst M, Mardones R, Shonnard P, Larson CM. A geographic zone method to describe intra-articular pathology in hip arthroscopy: cadaveric study and preliminary report. Arthroscopy. 2008 May;24(5):534-9. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2007.11.019. Epub 2008 Feb 1.
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
March 1, 2014
Primary Completion (Actual)
October 1, 2017
Study Completion (Actual)
October 1, 2017
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
December 5, 2016
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
December 8, 2016
First Posted (Estimate)
December 13, 2016
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
December 2, 2017
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
November 29, 2017
Last Verified
November 1, 2017
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- 13-2310
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
NO
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.