Effects of Inspiratory Muscle Training in Children With Cerebral Palsy

September 27, 2018 updated by: Muserrefe Nur Keles, Gazi University

Effects of Inspiratory Muscle Training on Respiratory Functions, Trunk Control, Activities of Daily Living, Functional Exercise Capacity and Quality of Life in Children With Cerebral Palsy

Even if cerebral palsy not directly effect respiratory system, impairment of nervous and muscle systems, because of the brain damage, may cause respiratory functions impairment. In literature, it has been showed that children with cerebral palsy have decreased respiratory muscle strength and associated with trunk control, quality of life and respiratory functions. But, there is no study in literature that aims to increase respiratory muscle strength in these children. Hence, the aim of this study is to investigate effects of inspiratory muscle training on respiratory functions, trunk control, activities of daily living, functional exercise capacity and quality of life in children with cerebral palsy.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

A convenience of children with hemiparetic and diplegia CP, 7-14 years, is going to recruited from Gazi University, Faculty of Health Science, Department of Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation. Patients will randomly allocate to either a treatment group or control group. The treatment group will receive inspiratory muscle training at 30-40% of maximal mouth pressure, the control group will receive sham inspiratory muscle training at a fixed work load, 5% of maximal mouth pressure. Groups are going to train for a total of 30 min/d, 7 days/week, for 6 weeks. Before and after treatment, every each of patients pulmonary function test will be evaluated with using spirometry, respiratory muscle strength using with electronic mouth pressure device, trunk control with using trunk control measurement scale, activities of daily living using with Pediatric Evaluation of Disability Inventory (PEDI), functional exercise capacity usin with six minute walk test (6MWT) and quality of life using with Cerebral Palsy Quality of Life Questionnaire (CPQOL).

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

25

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Ankara, Turkey, 06500
        • Gazi University, Faculty of Health and Sciences, Department of Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

7 years to 14 years (CHILD)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Aged 7-14 years
  • Diagnosed to spastic cerebral palsy
  • Gross Motor Function Classification System levels I or II.
  • Have no earlier interventions in the form of orthopaedic surgery or injection with botulinum toxin type A in the 6 month prior to baseline assessments
  • Child are able to demonstrate sufficient co-operation and cognitive understanding participating

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Active medical condition impairment (pneumonia etc.)
  • Do not accommodate the study
  • Do not want to attempt the study

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: PREVENTION
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: TRIPLE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: Treatment Group
The treatment group received Inspiratory muscle training (IMT) at 40% of maximal mouth pressure (PImax) by using Threshold IMT and training loads were adjusted to maintain 40% of the PImax weekly. The PImax was measured at supervised sessions each week, and 40% of the measured value was determined as the new training work load.
Training is going to perform by using a pressure threshold- loading device (Threshold, IMT, USA) used to inhale against a same-pressure load every inhalation for strengthening primarily the diaphragm and rib cage muscles. The device pressure is adjusted according to PImax, and reliability/reproducibility has been demonstrated.
SHAM_COMPARATOR: Control Group
The control group received sham Inspiratory muscle training (IMT) at a fixed work load, 5% of PImax by using Threshold IMT.
Training is going to perform by using a pressure threshold- loading device (Threshold, IMT, USA) used to inhale against a same-pressure load every inhalation for strengthening primarily the diaphragm and rib cage muscles. The device pressure is adjusted according to PImax, and reliability/reproducibility has been demonstrated.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Timed Up and Go Test
Time Frame: 6 weeks
this is a simple test used to assess a person's mobility and requires both static and dynamic balance. It uses the time that a person takes to rise from a chair, walk three meters, turn around, walk back to the chair and sit down. During the test, the child is expected to wear their regular footwear and use any mobility aids that they would normally require.
6 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Activities of daily living using with Pediatric Evaluation of Disability Inventory
Time Frame: 6 weeks
PEDI scale
6 weeks
Pulmonary Function Test
Time Frame: 6 weeks
spirometry
6 weeks
Respiratory muscle strength
Time Frame: 6 weeks
Mouth pressure device
6 weeks
Functional exercise capacity
Time Frame: 6 weeks
six minute walk test
6 weeks
Change in trunk control over time assessed with Trunk Control Measurement Scale
Time Frame: 6 weeks
Assessing change in trunk control
6 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

December 1, 2016

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

July 1, 2017

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

December 1, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 10, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 15, 2016

First Posted (ESTIMATE)

December 20, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

September 28, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 27, 2018

Last Verified

September 1, 2018

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

IPD Plan Description

We have no decided yet

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Cerebral Palsy

Clinical Trials on Threshold (IMT)

3
Subscribe