Re-Evaluation of Systemic Early Neuromuscular Blockade and Transthoracic Ultrasound Assessment of the Diaphragm (ROSETTA)

October 10, 2019 updated by: University Health Network, Toronto
ROSETTA is a multi-centre study evaluating the time course of diaphragm thickness and function following exposure to neuromuscular blockade or control in patients with acute respiratory distress. ROSETTA is an ancillary study to the Re-evaluation of Systemic Early Neuromuscular Blockade (ROSE) trial (NCT02509078). It is designed to (1) test the feasibility of a multi-center evaluation of the diaphragm structure and function by ultrasound during mechanical ventilation and (2) determine whether neuromuscular blockade accelerates atrophy and dysfunction of the diaphragm in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS).

Study Overview

Detailed Description

A growing body of evidence strongly suggests that mechanical ventilation injures the respiratory muscles, particularly the diaphragm. Due to the deleterious effects of diaphragm inactivity on diaphragm function, there are important concerns about the risk of diaphragm weakness and difficult liberation from mechanical ventilation following neuromuscular blockade. Sonographic measurements of diaphragm thickness provide a potentially useful window for studying diaphragm injury and function during mechanical ventilation.

Patients enrolled in the ROSE trial (randomizing patients with moderate-severe acute respiratory distress syndrome to receive neuromuscular blockade or control for 2 days) will be eligible for participation in this study. Study patients will undergo regular diaphragm ultrasound to assess diaphragm thickness and activity during the first week of the study. Diaphragm function will be assessed by ultrasound on study days 7, 14, 21, and 28.

ROSETTA is designed to:

  1. Test the feasibility of a multi-center evaluation of the diaphragm structure and function by ultrasound during mechanical ventilation;
  2. Determine whether neuromuscular blockade accelerates atrophy and dysfunction of the diaphragm in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome; and
  3. Evaluate whether patients with greater diaphragm dysfunction exhibit worse functional outcomes compared to patients without diaphragm dysfunction.

Study Type

Observational

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Massachusetts
      • Boston, Massachusetts, United States, 02115
        • Brigham and Women's Health
      • Springfield, Massachusetts, United States, 01199
        • Baystate Health
    • Ohio
      • Cleveland, Ohio, United States, 44195
        • Cleveland Clinic
      • Columbus, Ohio, United States, 43210
        • The Ohio State University Wexner Medical CEnter
    • Oregon
      • Portland, Oregon, United States, 97239
        • Oregon Health & Science University
    • Tennessee
      • Nashville, Tennessee, United States, 37232
        • Vanderbilt University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

19 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

Patients with moderate to severe acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) who consent to the ROSE trial will be invited to participate in the ROSETTA study.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

1. Patients enrolled in the ROSE PETAL trial (adult patients with moderate-severe acute respiratory distress syndrome who have received invasive mechanical ventilation for less than 5 days)

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Patients expected to be extubated within 24 hours of screening for eligibility
  2. Patients with a contraindication to chest ultrasonography (chest tubes inserted over right lower chest wall; chest wall trauma)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Patients with moderate or severe ARDS

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Study feasibility - number of participating centers
Time Frame: Through study completion, an average of 18 months
The number of centers that participate in the study
Through study completion, an average of 18 months
Study feasibility - number of trained sonographers in study
Time Frame: Through study completion, an average of 18 months
The number of trained sonographers who collect measurements with ultrasound in the study
Through study completion, an average of 18 months
Study feasibility - enrolment rate
Time Frame: Through study completion, an average of 18 months
Percentage of potentially eligible patients in ROSE trial who are enrolled in ROSETTA
Through study completion, an average of 18 months
Study feasibility - measurement acquisition rate
Time Frame: Through study completion, an average of 18 months
Percentage of scheduled study measurements that are actually collected
Through study completion, an average of 18 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Diaphragm function
Time Frame: Study day 7
Maximal diaphragm thickening fraction
Study day 7
Changes in diaphragm thickness over time with or without neuromuscular blockade
Time Frame: First week of study
First week of study

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

October 12, 2017

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2018

Study Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 19, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 25, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

April 28, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

October 14, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 10, 2019

Last Verified

July 1, 2018

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome

Subscribe