Appropriateness of Intravenous Antibiotics Prescriptions at Hospital Discharge

June 1, 2017 updated by: Romanee Chaiwarith, Chiang Mai University

Quasi-experimental Study Comparing Intravenous Antibiotics Prescriptions at Hospital Discharge With and Without ID Consultation

A quasi-experimental study was conducted among patients receiving care at the medicine units of the Maharaj Nakorn Chiang Mai Hospital to determine the appropriateness of intravenous antibiotics at hospital discharge with and without ID consultation.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

The pre-intervention period was started from November 1, 2015 to April 30, 2016 (6-month period), in which the intravenous antibiotics at hospital discharge were prescribed by the primary care team. The post-intervention period was started from May 1, 2016 to February 28, 2017 (10-month period), in which the intravenous antibiotics at hospital discharge were reviewed and intervened by ID team.

The appropriateness of intravenous antibiotics was assessed separately by the ID fellow and ID specialist. If disagreement occurred, the feedback to the ID fellow was performed and the decision by ID specialist was used in the final analysis of appropriateness.

In post-intervention period, ID fellow modified the intravenous antibiotics ordered by the primary team if those intravenous antibiotics were judged as inappropriate by ID fellow as follows: 1) discontinue intravenous antibiotics (treatment was complete), 2) switch to oral antibiotics, 3) change intravenous antibiotics to cover isolated pathogens, 4) adjust the dose of intravenous antibiotics, and 5) change the duration of intravenous antibiotics

Finally, ID specialist retrospectively assessed the appropriateness of intravenous antibiotics at hospital discharge managed by ID fellow in post-intervention period.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

173

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Chiang Mai, Thailand, 50200
        • Department of Medicine

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

15 years and older (Child, Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

All adult patients who met the following criteria were consecutively enrolled;

  1. age≥ 15 years old and
  2. had infections at any sites and received intravenous antibiotics.

Exclusion Criteria:

- They were evaluated by infectious diseases specialist for appropriate antibiotics during admission

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Health Services Research
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Sequential Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
No Intervention: pre-intervention period
The charts of patients who were prescribed intravenous antibiotics at hospital discharge were reviewed. Appropriateness of intravenous antibiotics was assessed by ID specialists.
Experimental: post-intervention period
The intervention is the charts of patients who were prescribed intravenous antibiotics at hospital discharge by the primary team were prospectively reviewed and intervened by ID team (ID specialist approval)
Appropriateness of intravenous antibiotics ordered by the primary team was assessed by ID specialist. ID fellow modified the intravenous antibiotics ordered by the primary team if those intravenous antibiotics were judged as inappropriate by ID fellow as follows: 1) discontinue intravenous antibiotics (treatment was complete), 2) switch to oral antibiotics, 3) change intravenous antibiotics to cover isolated pathogens, 4) adjust the dose of intravenous antibiotics, and 5) change the duration of intravenous antibiotics. Finally, ID specialist retrospectively assessed the appropriateness of intravenous antibiotics at hospital discharge managed by ID fellow in post-intervention period.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The proportion of appropriateness of intravenous antibiotics prescriptions at hospital discharge between groups
Time Frame: 16 months
To calculate the number of antibiotic prescriptions at hospital discharge over the total number of prescriptions, comparing between pre-and post-intervention period.
16 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The costs of antibiotics for the course of treatment
Time Frame: 16 months
To compare the cost of antibiotics for the course of treatment between the 2 periods
16 months
Clinical improvement at 1 week
Time Frame: 1 week
To calculate the number of patients who had clinical improvement at 1 week over the total number of patients in each period, comparing between the 2 periods
1 week
Readmission within 30 days, length of hospital stay
Time Frame: 30 days
To calculate the number of patients who were readmitted within 30 days over the total number of patients in each period, comparing between the 2 periods
30 days
Length of hospital stay
Time Frame: 60 days
To calculate the length of hospital stays in days between 2 periods
60 days

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Romanee Chaiwarith, MD, Maharaj Nakorn Chiang Mai Hospital

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

November 1, 2015

Primary Completion (Actual)

February 28, 2017

Study Completion (Actual)

February 28, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 3, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 30, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

June 2, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

June 5, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 1, 2017

Last Verified

June 1, 2017

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Anti-Infectives Adverse Reaction

Clinical Trials on ID specialist approval

3
Subscribe