Advancing People of Color in Clinical Trials Now: Involvement in Trials Using a Patient-Centered Website: A Community-Engaged Approach (ACT Now)

January 28, 2022 updated by: NYU Langone Health
The purpose pf this study is to evaluate the comparative effectiveness of a culturally and linguistically tailored clinical trial literacy website in increasing likelihood of participating in clinical trials. To achieve this objective,a randomized group design will address the following patient-centered outcomes: willingness to enroll in clinical trials and behavioral intent as well as likelihood of referring others to enroll in such trials) before and after exposure to a culturally-tailored clinical trial literacy website. Health literacy will be measured both before and post exposure to tailored messages. Participants will be randomized into two groups. The intervention group (n=50) will have access to culturally tailored website. Participants in the control group (n=50) will have access to NYU 's standard trial participation website.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

Compelling evidence demonstrates racial/ethnic disparities in health and healthcare in the United States. These disparities arise from various factors including unequal access to adequate medical care, perceived racial discrimination, and poor health literacy.The Center for Healthful Behavior Change (CHBC) has been involved in numerous initiatives to eradicate health disparities and have implemented NIH-funded interventions to address inequities in health. Interventions targeting patient-centered outcomes have been suboptimal because of inadequate infrastructure to support equitable contributions from stakeholders (patients, providers, and community leaders) in all aspects of the research process. This is crucial to promote sustainable effects regarding minority patients' ability to make informed decisions about participating in existing clinical trials. This study will address this gap, bringing together academic investigators and important stakeholders to develop a website providing access to culturally tailored videos to enhance awareness of clinical trial, health literacy, thus promoting participation in existing clinical trials.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

112

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • New York
      • New York, New York, United States, 10016
        • New York University School of Medicine

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Self-reported race/ethnicity as African American, African, Caribbean American or black men and women
  • accessible by telephone
  • no plans to move away from the region within the year following enrollment; consent to participate.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Progressive medical illness in which disability or death is expected within one year
  • impaired cognitive or functional ability, which would preclude meaningful participation in the study
  • stated intention to move within the same year of enrollment.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Health Services Research
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Intervention Group
The intervention group will have access to culturally tailored website.
Participants randomized to the intervention arm will have free access to a password protected interactive culturally and linguistically tailored website via a tablet device. No private identifiable data about you will be collected. Participants will receive a brief 10-minute tutorial by a trained research assistant on login procedures and use of the website.
Active Comparator: Control Group
Participants in the control group will have access to NYU 's standard trial participation website.
Participants randomized to the control condition will have free access to the NYU standard clinical trials website. Participants in the control condition will have access to the tailored website at the date of study completion (no later than 6 months' post-date of enrollment).

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
ACTNOW! Clinical Trial Knowledge Assessment Score
Time Frame: Baseline
26 statements involved in assessing the participants' knowledge of clinical trials. The total range of score is 0-104; the higher the score, the higher the level of knowledge.
Baseline
Clinical Trial Knowledge Assessment Score
Time Frame: Month 1
26 statements involved in assessing the participants' knowledge of clinical trials. The total range of score is 0-104; the higher the score, the higher the level of knowledge.
Month 1
Clinical Trial Knowledge Assessment Score
Time Frame: Month 3
26 statements involved in assessing the participants' knowledge of clinical trials. The total range of score is 0-104; the higher the score, the higher the level of knowledge.
Month 3
ACTNOW! Self-Efficacy Score
Time Frame: Baseline
A 4-item perceived effectiveness scale was used to assess the perceived persuasiveness of the message. The total range of score is 0-16; the higher the score, the higher the level of self-efficacy.
Baseline
Self-Efficacy Score
Time Frame: Month 1
A 4-item perceived effectiveness scale, adapted from Fishbein et al. (2002) was used to assess the perceived persuasiveness of the message. The total range of score is 0-16; the higher the score, the higher the level of self-efficacy.
Month 1
Self-Efficacy Score
Time Frame: Month 3
A 4-item perceived effectiveness scale, adapted from Fishbein et al. (2002) was used to assess the perceived persuasiveness of the message. The total range of score is 0-16; the higher the score, the higher the level of self-efficacy.
Month 3

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Girardin Jean-Louis, Ph.D., NYU Langone Health

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

August 14, 2017

Primary Completion (Actual)

January 28, 2019

Study Completion (Actual)

April 28, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 2, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 7, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

August 8, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

February 1, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 28, 2022

Last Verified

January 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

Undecided

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Recruitment

Clinical Trials on Tailored Website

Subscribe