Impact of Hypno-analgesia on Pain During a Lumbar Puncture for Diagnosis of Alzheimer's Disease (PLHYMANEDE)

November 20, 2020 updated by: University Hospital, Montpellier

Impact of Hypno-analgesia, Non-drugs Technique of Care, on Pain That May Inverve During a Lumbar Puncture for Diagnosis of Patient With Mild to Moderate Alzheimer's Dementia.

One of the missions of the Memory of Resources and Research Center (CMRR) is to establish a diagnosis of expertise in patients with amestic, language or behavioral cognitive complaint. Thanks to the dosage of specific biomarkers in the cererbrospinal fluid (CSF), it is currently possible to determine the underlying process of the disease in vivo by assess the pathological amyloid and Tau profile. To obtain these very sensitive and specific biomarkers, clinicians need to perform lumbar puncture (LP). . This exam is easy and reproducible but the gesture image remained negative despite some advances in the materials and care..

Within the Department of Neurology of Montpellier, the recommendations of the Haute Autorité de Santé (HAS) about pain management in adults are applied. A transdermal device of lidocaine-pilocaine (type EMLA) is applied 120 minutes before the LP . In addition, an equimolar oxygen-nitrous oxide (MEOPA) mixture could be added. Then, patients benefit from a helping relationship before and during the gesture dedicated to reduce anxiety.

Until recently, non-medicinal techniques (relaxation, hypnosis ...) were not recommendedin cases of major anxiety or analgesia deemed insufficient. Many studies have shown the efficiency of hypnoalgia in invasive gestures in young children. The University Hospital of Montpellier have developed training about hypnoanalgesia and have been implemented for patients with neurological disorders in our unit. A reduction and even a suppression of pain and a limitation of the apprehension of the gesture have been judged satisfactory both for the patient, the practionner and the nurse practicing regularly the LP. However, this evalusation remained subjective and clinically-based. Thus, it seems relevantto analyse the effect of this technic in order th test the following hypothesis: hypno-analgesia (non-medicinal technique of care) associated with EMLA patch is more effective than the helping relationship associated with EMLA patch to reduce the pain that may inverse during the LP for diagnosis in patient with mild to moderate stage of Alzheimer's disease.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The main objective was to assess whether the use of hypnoanalgesia technic during the LP procedure comparing to commun procedure reduce the pain of the patient evaluated by the hetero-evaluation ALGOPLUS scale.

Secondary objectives were to evaluate the differences between the hypno-analgesia and the helping relationship on:

  • pain assessed by the Simple Verbal Scale (EVS);
  • pain assessed by the Visual Analog Scale (EVA);
  • pain and stress measured by conductance analysis;
  • the anxiety score assessed by a STAI self-assessment questionnaire (State-Trait Anxiety Inventory, STAI-Y);
  • the rate of failure during the LP procedure.

Methodology :

A monocentric randomized controlled, open-label (with an evaluation of the blind randomization of the randomization arm) with two parallel arms:

  • the arm named "hypno-analgesia + EMLA patch" = cutaneous anesthesia associated with hypno-analgesia.
  • the arm called "helping relationship + EMLA patch" = cutaneous anesthesia associated with a helping relationship The estimated number of patients was 100. Analysis of the primary outcome measure: The score of the ALGOPLUS scale will compared between the two groups of patients using the Chi2 test after checking the validity conditions of the test.

The project will last 36 months and the duration of the inclusions 24 months. The LP will be carried out during one day of hospitalization as part of the diagnosis assessments. No specific follow-up is scheduled.

Study Type

Interventional

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

50 years to 90 years (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion criteria:

  • Patient presenting clinical symptoms that may reflect Alzheimer's disease according to the criteria of NIA 2011, with either an isolated hippocampal episodic deficit or associated with dys-executive, phasic or praxic disorders of memory disorder, of insidious progressive evolution with a documented cognitive decline
  • Global cognitive score with Mini Mental State MMS between 22 and 27;
  • Age between 50 and 90 years ;
  • Written and informed consent for this study signed by the patient

Exclusion criteria:

  • Refusal to have a LP procedure in the diagnosis process ;
  • Refusal to participate in a session of hypno-analgesia;
  • Refusal to be filmed during the LP ;
  • Patient having already had a session of hypno-analgesia for other diagnostic assessments;
  • Patient that done yoga or quite different technique of relaxation ;
  • Socio-educational level not allowing the understanding of the neuropsychological tests;
  • Not able to follow the majority of the aspects of the study without accompanying ;
  • Refusal to sign the written and informed consent ;
  • Patient deprived of freedom by court or administrative order

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: SUPPORTIVE_CARE
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: SINGLE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Other: Standard Care
Relational care used to help the patient by reducing the fear and anxiety
Relational care is combined with a cutaneous anesthesia (Transcutaneous device(plan) of lidocaïne-pilocaïne (EMLA®))
Other: Hypnosis
Hypno-analgesia is used to help the patient by reducing the fear and anxiety
Hypno-analgesia is combined with a cutaneous anesthesia (Transcutaneous device(plan) of lidocaïne-pilocaïne (EMLA®))

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Algoplus score of pain during the LP procedure
Time Frame: 1 day
Evaluation of the pain during the Lumbar Punction procedure using the ALGOPLUS (Scale of behavioral evaluation of the pain on 30 points, 30 points being the worst pain) Scale assessment on the patients of each group
1 day

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Rate of failure of the Lumbar Ponction
Time Frame: 1 day
This outcome is defined by the incapacity to perform the Lumbar Punction or by the incapacity to collect 12 ml of CSF (cererbrospinal fluid) therefore is defined by the number of the Lumbar Punction aborted
1 day
Evaluation of the anxiety
Time Frame: 1 day
Assessed by an self-completed questionnaire STAI (State-Trait Anxiety Inventory, STAI-Y-A) done before and after the Lumbar Punction and oriented on the anxiety during the LP
1 day
Evaluation of the pain
Time Frame: 1 day
assessed by the Pain monitorTM . The threshold is fixed in 0.2 pic/seconds over whom it is considered that pain is present
1 day
Evaluation of the pain by the patient
Time Frame: 1 day
assessed by the scales EVA (Visual analog scale)
1 day
Evaluation of the pain by the patient
Time Frame: 1 day
assessed by the scales EVS (Simple Verbal scale)
1 day

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Audrey GABELLE, MD, PhD, CHU de Montpellier

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Anticipated)

January 1, 2018

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

November 1, 2020

Study Completion (Anticipated)

November 13, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 16, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 21, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

November 24, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

November 24, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 20, 2020

Last Verified

November 1, 2017

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Cognitive Impairment

Clinical Trials on Relational care

Subscribe