Study to Compare Pathologic Type, NIH and WHO Criteria,and Mechanism of GIST Malignant Transformation

December 20, 2017 updated by: Shanghai Zhongshan Hospital

Prospective Multicenter Cohort Study to Compare Pathologic Type, NIH and WHO Criteria, and Mechanism of GIST Malignant Transformation

Evaluate the reliability of morphology standards for GIST pathologic type, staging and grading by retrospective analyzing clinical data; on this basis, establish a GIST standardized and individualized treatment mode to maximum benefit GIST patients, avoid under- and over-treatment

Study Overview

Detailed Description

  1. Retrospective analysis of GIST cases in the recent five years: the GIST clinical data of Fudan University Zhongshan Hospital from 2007 January to 2012 December were collected. By reviewing the HE slides, GIST was evaluated by 12 indicators, NIH scheme and WHO standard. Accomplish the gene sequencing of KIT, PDGFRA, B-raf, and SDH. Follow up the patients about their treatment and prognosis. Analyze and compare the advantages and disadvantages of the histomorphology indicators, NIH scheme, and WHO standard.
  2. Organize the first multicenter prospective cohort study of GIST individualized treatment based on the histomorphology. Obtain the evidence of histological assessment for GIST by following up patients for 3 years.
  3. Establish an evaluation criteria based on the morphology of GIST. Make objective evaluations about GIST tumor size, tumor location and gene mutation status in the prognosis estimate. Make rules to effectively guide individualized treatment of GIST.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Anticipated)

3000

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Shanghai
      • Shanghai, Shanghai, China, 200032

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

14 years to 80 years (Child, Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Patients diagnosed with GIST by pathology

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • All patients pathologically diagnosed with GIST during the period from 2017 to 2020

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Only have Biopsy diagnosis
  • Only have Liver metastasis or peritoneal dissemination
  • Received imatinib treatment before surgery

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Treatment observation group
According to the morphological criteria, the NIH scheme, and the WHO standard, GIST patients are divided into two groups, benign group and malignant group. In fully informed of their illness, patients are free to choose the sequence treatments according to their own gene mutation status and economic conditions. Patients who choose postoperative Imatinib treatment are labeled treatment group.
The NIH assessment of patients with surgical excision of GIST with moderate to high risk of recurrence was recommended imatinib 400mg treatment.
Control observation group
According to the morphological criteria, the NIH scheme, and the WHO standard, GIST patients are divided into two groups, benign group and malignant group. In fully informed of their illness, patients are free to choose the sequence treatments according to their own gene mutation status and economic conditions. Patients who choose no Imatinib treatment are labeled observation group.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Number of participants with tumor recurrence
Time Frame: 3 years
3 years
Number of participants with tumor metastasis
Time Frame: 3 years
3 years

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Chair: Hou Ying Yong, Doctor, Shanghai Zhongshan Hospital

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

July 1, 2017

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

July 1, 2020

Study Completion (Anticipated)

January 1, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 18, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 20, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

December 21, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

December 21, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 20, 2017

Last Verified

December 1, 2017

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

Yes

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Method of Differentiating Benignancy and Malignancy, Grading and Staging for GIST

Clinical Trials on Imatinib 400mg

Subscribe