Treadmill Exercise in Metabolic Syndrome

May 20, 2022 updated by: Gloria Y. Yeh, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
The main purpose of this study is to better understand the effects of two types of treadmill exercise programs that include education and/or techniques that may be helpful for exercise among individuals with, or at risk for, metabolic syndrome.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

12

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Massachusetts
      • Boston, Massachusetts, United States, 02215
        • BIDMC

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 65 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Referred by healthcare provider and given medical clearance for moderate-intensity exercise
  2. Metabolic syndrome, defined as meeting three or more of the following criteria:

    • Obesity or overweight defined as BMI > 25
    • Impaired glycemia (fasting blood sugar of ≥ 100 [5.6 mmol/L] or glycated hemoglobin [A1C] of ≥ 5.7)
    • Increased blood pressure (130/85 mmHg or higher) or if you take medicine for high blood pressure
    • Increased fasting levels of triglycerides (≥ 150 or 1.7 mmol/L) or decreased fasting high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol (less than 40 mg/dL or 1 mmol/L for men or 50 mg/dL or 1.3 mmol/L for women) or if you take any medicines for dyslipidemia
  3. Between the ages of 18-65
  4. No regular physical activity (≥ 3 or more days per week) for the past 3 months

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Contraindications for treadmill exercise determined by their physician (e.g., cardiopulmonary limitations or diagnoses) or other inability to do treadmill exercise (e.g., musculoskeletal restrictions or severe balance impairment)
  2. Confirmed diagnosis of coronary artery disease
  3. Confirmed diagnosis of diabetes
  4. Currently taking a beta blocker or calcium channel blocker medication
  5. Uncontrolled and untreated hypertension, defined as a resting blood pressure of 150/90
  6. Confirmed diagnosis of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease or other severe lung dysfunction that may interfere with exercise (e.g., severe asthma)
  7. Self-reported psychotic disorder
  8. Current practice of mindfulness mediation or mindful movement (e.g., yoga or tai chi), defined as regular daily practice or >2 classes or self-guided sessions per week in the past three months.
  9. Non-English speaking

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Other
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Treadmill exercise
12-session, 6-week traditional treadmill exercise program
Experimental: Treadmill exercise with behavioral techniques
12-session, 6-week treadmill exercise program utilizing behavioral techniques while walking

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Recruitment Feasibility
Time Frame: Through study completion, an average of 1 year
% willing to be randomized
Through study completion, an average of 1 year
Protocol Adherence
Time Frame: Through study completion, an average of 1 year
% sessions attended
Through study completion, an average of 1 year

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Cardiopulmonary Dynamics
Time Frame: Weeks 1 and 6
CardioPulmonary Exercise Testing (standard metabolic cart)
Weeks 1 and 6
Fatigue
Time Frame: Week 0, week 3, post-intervention (after 6 week intervention)
Fatigue Severity Scale-7; total score range: 7-49, higher scores = greater fatigue severity
Week 0, week 3, post-intervention (after 6 week intervention)
Global Health
Time Frame: Week 0, week 3, post-intervention (after 6 week intervention)
PROMIS Global Health-10; Global physical health total score range: 4-20, higher scores = better global physical health
Week 0, week 3, post-intervention (after 6 week intervention)
Psychological Symptoms
Time Frame: Week 0, week 3, post-intervention (after 6 week intervention)
Depression Anxiety and Stress Scale-21; Depression total score range: 0-21, higher scores = greater depressive symptoms
Week 0, week 3, post-intervention (after 6 week intervention)
Affect
Time Frame: Week 0, week 3, post-intervention (after 6 week intervention)
Positive and Negative Affect Schedule; 2 subscales; each with score range 10-50, higher = greater positive or negative affect
Week 0, week 3, post-intervention (after 6 week intervention)
Anxiety Sensitivity
Time Frame: Week 0, week 3, post-intervention (after 6 week intervention)
Anxiety Sensitivity Index-3; Total score range: 0-72, higher scores = higher levels of anxiety sensitivity
Week 0, week 3, post-intervention (after 6 week intervention)
Distress Tolerance
Time Frame: Week 0, week 3, post-intervention (after 6 week intervention)
Distress Tolerance Scale; total score range: 15-75, higher scores = higher levels of distress tolerance
Week 0, week 3, post-intervention (after 6 week intervention)
Discomfort Intolerance
Time Frame: Week 0, week 3, post-intervention (after 6 week intervention)
Discomfort Intolerance Scale-Revised; total score range: 0-126, higher scores = higher levels of discomfort intolerance
Week 0, week 3, post-intervention (after 6 week intervention)
Physical Activity Acceptance
Time Frame: Week 0, week 3, post-intervention (after 6 week intervention)
Physical Activity Acceptance Questionnaire; total score range: 10-70, higher scores = greater physical activity acceptance
Week 0, week 3, post-intervention (after 6 week intervention)
Exercise Self-Efficacy
Time Frame: Week 0, week 3, post-intervention (after 6 week intervention)
Multidimensional Self-Efficacy Scale; total score range: 0-90, higher scores = higher levels of exercise self-efficacy
Week 0, week 3, post-intervention (after 6 week intervention)
Exercise Motivation
Time Frame: Week 0, week 3, post-intervention (after 6 week intervention)
Behavioral Regulation towards Exercise Questionnaire-2; 5 subscales, each with score range: 0-16, higher scores = higher levels of regulation
Week 0, week 3, post-intervention (after 6 week intervention)
Exercise Barriers
Time Frame: Week 0, week 3, post-intervention (after 6 week intervention)
Exercise Benefits and Barriers Scale; 2 subscales; Exercise benefits subscale score range: 29-116, higher scores = higher perceived benefit from exercise; Exercise barriers subscale score range: 14-56, higher scores = higher perceived barriers to exercise
Week 0, week 3, post-intervention (after 6 week intervention)
Physical Activity
Time Frame: Week 0, week 3, post-intervention (after 6 week intervention)
Godin Leisure Time Exercise Questionnaire; open-ended responses, higher scores = greater activity time
Week 0, week 3, post-intervention (after 6 week intervention)
Trait Mindfulness
Time Frame: Week 0, week 3, post-intervention (after 6 week intervention)
Five Facet Mindfulness Questionnaire; 5 subscales; Observe subscale score range: 8-40, higher scores = greater observing skills; Describe subscale score range: 8-40, higher scores = greater describing skills; Acting with Awareness subscale score range: 8-40, higher scores = greater awareness skills; Nonjudgment subscale score range: 8-40, higher scores = greater nonjudgment skills; Nonreactivity subscale score range: 7-35, higher scores = greater nonreactivity skills
Week 0, week 3, post-intervention (after 6 week intervention)
State Mindfulness
Time Frame: Weeks 1, 3, 6
State Mindfulness Scale for Physical Activity; 2 subscales, each with score range: 0-24, higher scores = higher levels of mindfulness
Weeks 1, 3, 6
Interoceptive Awareness
Time Frame: Week 0, week 3, post-intervention (after 6 week intervention)
Multidimensional Assessment of Interoceptive Awareness; 8 subscales, each with score ranges: 0-5, higher scores = better
Week 0, week 3, post-intervention (after 6 week intervention)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 9, 2019

Primary Completion (Actual)

July 7, 2021

Study Completion (Actual)

October 20, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 23, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 9, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

February 19, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 26, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 20, 2022

Last Verified

May 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Metabolic Syndrome

Clinical Trials on Treadmill Exercise- traditional approach

Subscribe