Asymmetric Locomotor Training in the Elderly to Restore Physical Function

Innovative advances in rehabilitation technology have created a split-belt treadmill capable of providing a much needed intervention aimed at limiting mobility disability. When desynchronized, the split-belt treadmill imposes demands on each leg such that the central nervous system must adapt to the challenge. Based on preliminary data from our lab utilizing the split-belt treadmill, the investigators hypothesize this intervention can challenge the locomotor processes required for safe, efficient gait while concurrently providing an aerobic stimulus will produce favorable changes in physical function in older adults at risk for mobility disability.

Study Overview

• Status: Withdrawn
• Conditions: Disability
• Intervention / Treatment: Behavioral: Traditional Treadmill; Behavioral: Split-belt

Detailed Description

For this pilot study the investigators will enroll 20 sedentary older adults at risk for disability (usual gait speed ≤ 1.0 m/s). Participants will be assigned to one of two 12-week interventions. Therefore the final training pool will consist of 10 split-belt participants and 10 traditional treadmill participants. Aim 1 will test the hypothesis that compared with a traditional treadmill intervention a split-belt treadmill intervention will result in improved mobility, as measure by 400 meter walk time, as well self reported physical function/disability as measured by the Pepper Assessment Tool for Disability. Aim 2 will test the hypothesis that compared with a traditional treadmill intervention a split-belt treadmill intervention will results in improved gait variability. To date, no experimental study has evaluated these propositions in a controlled trial testing the effects of split-belt training in older adults at risk for disability.

• Study Type: Interventional
• Phase: Not Applicable

Participation Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

• Ages Eligible for Study: 65 years to 89 years (OLDER_ADULT)
• Accepts Healthy Volunteers: No
• Genders Eligible for Study: All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

• aged 65 to 89
• walking speed of ≤ 1 m/s
• ≥ 0.033s of stance time variability
• sedentary as defined by spending less than 20 minutes per week in the past month getting regular physical activity

Exclusion Criteria:

• Significant cognitive impairment
• Failure to provide informed consent
• The need of a walker during the 400 meter walk
• Progressive, degenerative neurological disease
• Severe diabetes, requiring use of insulin

Study Plan

How is the study designed?

Design Details

• Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
• Allocation: RANDOMIZED
• Interventional Model: PARALLEL
• Masking: SINGLE

Number of Arms

2

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm	Intervention / Treatment
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: Traditional Treadmill; Participants will follow the same guidelines as the split belt component but will complete the intervention on a traditional, single belt/speed treadmill.	Behavioral: Traditional Treadmill; Participants will complete the intervention in 12-weeks, 3 times per week sessions.; Other Names: Traditional Treadmill is a single belt/speed treadmill.
EXPERIMENTAL: Split-belt; Participants will walk on a custom-built split-belt treadmill comprised of two separate belts, each with its own motor, that permitted the speed of each belt (i.e. each leg) to be controlled independently.	Behavioral: Split-belt; Participants will complete the intervention in 12-weeks, 3 times per week sessions.; Other Names: Split-belt has two seprate belts.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure	Measure Description	Time Frame
Change in gait speed, as measure by 400 meter walk time, following 12-weeks of intervention	Participants will be asked to walk at their usual pace, without over exerting. They can stop for up to 1 min for fatigue or other symptoms. A time limit of 15 minutes to perform the test has been established based on the following considerations.	Participants will be evaluated within 1-week prior to begining the intervention and within 1-week following completion of the 12-week intervention

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure	Measure Description	Time Frame
Change in gait variability from pre to post 12-week intervention	We will test this working hypothesis by examining changes in spatial and temporal characteristics of gait that occur following 12-weeks of split-belt versus traditional treadmill training. Measures of interest will include variability in stance time, step length, stride length, stride time, swing time, and double limb support time directly from the GAITRite.	Participants will be evaluated within 1-week prior to begining the intervention and within 1-week following completion of the 12-week intervention

Collaborators and Investigators

• Sponsor: University of Florida
• Investigators: Principal Investigator: Chris Hass, Ph.D., University of Florida

Study record dates

Study Major Dates

• Study Start: April 1, 2012
• Primary Completion (ACTUAL): April 1, 2012
• Study Completion (ACTUAL): April 1, 2012

Study Registration Dates

• First Submitted: February 14, 2012
• First Submitted That Met QC Criteria: February 22, 2012
• First Posted (ESTIMATE): February 23, 2012

Study Record Updates

• Last Update Posted (ESTIMATE): July 19, 2013
• Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria: July 18, 2013
• Last Verified: July 1, 2013

More Information

Terms related to this study

• Other Study ID Numbers: UF_IOA_Pepper_Nocera