The Effect of a Resistance Training Program in Healthcare Workers on Pain, Workability and Physical Function.

October 5, 2019 updated by: José Casaña Granell, University of Valencia

The Effect of a Brief Daily Resistance Training Program in Healthcare Workers on Pain, Workability and Physical Function.

The prevalence and consequences of musculoskeletal pain is considerable among healthcare workers, allegedly due to high physical work demands of healthcare work.

Performing physical exercise at the workplace together with colleagues may be more motivating for some employees and thus increase adherence. On the other hand, physical exercise performed during working hours at the workplace may be costly for the employers in terms of time spend. Thus, it seems relevant to perform a brief intervention. This study is intended to investigate the difference between the effect of workplace-based physical exercise (using elastic bands and body weight exercises) and a group control on musculoskeletal pain, physical exertion during work, physical function, need for recovery, self-rated use of analgesics, and work ability among healthcare workers.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

37

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Valencia, Spain, 46010
        • Clinic Universitary Hospital of Valencia

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Healthcare Workers at the Hospital
  • Informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Unable to perform exercises

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Intervention
15 minutes of resistance training at the work place every day
15 minutes of resistance training during work every day
No Intervention: Control
Usual work

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Pain overall status: Standard 7-point patient global impression
Time Frame: 2 days after the end of intervention (POST)
Standard 7-point patient global impression of pain collected at the endpoint
2 days after the end of intervention (POST)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Workability Index
Time Frame: Baseline
Questionnaire work ability
Baseline
Workability Index
Time Frame: 2 days after the end of intervention (POST)
Questionnaire work ability
2 days after the end of intervention (POST)
Physical function
Time Frame: Baseline
Physical tests (push-ups, Biering-Sorensen test, Sit to Stand)
Baseline
Physical function
Time Frame: 2 days after the end of intervention (POST)
Physical tests (push-ups, Biering-Sorensen test, Sit to Stand)
2 days after the end of intervention (POST)
Perceived physical exertion
Time Frame: Baseline
Based on Borg's rate of perceived exertion (RPE) (Borg CR10 scale)
Baseline
Perceived physical exertion
Time Frame: 3 weeks of resistance training
Based on Borg's rate of perceived exertion (RPE) (Borg CR10 scale)
3 weeks of resistance training
Perceived physical exertion
Time Frame: 6 weeks of resistance training
Based on Borg's rate of perceived exertion (RPE) (Borg CR10 scale)
6 weeks of resistance training
Perceived physical exertion
Time Frame: 2 days after the end of intervention (POST)
Based on Borg's rate of perceived exertion (RPE) (Borg CR10 scale)
2 days after the end of intervention (POST)
"Need for recovery scale" after work
Time Frame: Baseline
Five point scale (1 = never, 5 = always)
Baseline
"Need for recovery scale" after work
Time Frame: 3 weeks of resistance training
Five point scale (1 = never, 5 = always)
3 weeks of resistance training
"Need for recovery scale" after work
Time Frame: 6 weeks of resistance training
Five point scale (1 = never, 5 = always)
6 weeks of resistance training
"Need for recovery scale" after work
Time Frame: 2 days after the end of intervention (POST)
Five point scale (1 = never, 5 = always)
2 days after the end of intervention (POST)
Self-rated use of analgesics
Time Frame: Baseline
The number of days the participants used analgesics during the last week
Baseline
Self-rated use of analgesics
Time Frame: 3 weeks of resistance training
The number of days the participants used analgesics during the last week
3 weeks of resistance training
Self-rated use of analgesics
Time Frame: 6 weeks of resistance training
The number of days the participants used analgesics during the last week
6 weeks of resistance training
Self-rated use of analgesics
Time Frame: 2 days after the end of intervention (POST)
The number of days the participants used analgesics during the last week
2 days after the end of intervention (POST)
Pain: Average pain intensity (Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Scale 0-10)
Time Frame: Baseline
Average pain intensity (Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Scale 0-10, 0 = not pain, 10 = worst possible pain)
Baseline
Pain: Average pain intensity (Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Scale 0-10)
Time Frame: 3 weeks of resistance training
Average pain intensity (Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Scale 0-10, 0 = not pain, 10 = worst possible pain)
3 weeks of resistance training
Pain: Average pain intensity (Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Scale 0-10)
Time Frame: 6 weeks of resistance training
Average pain intensity (Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Scale 0-10, 0 = not pain, 10 = worst possible pain)
6 weeks of resistance training
Pain: Average pain intensity (Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Scale 0-10)
Time Frame: 2 days after the end of intervention (POST)
Average pain intensity (Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Scale 0-10, 0 = not pain, 10 = worst possible pain)
2 days after the end of intervention (POST)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Chair: Jose C Granell, PhD, University of Valencia

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

April 17, 2018

Primary Completion (Actual)

June 19, 2018

Study Completion (Actual)

June 19, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 13, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 16, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

April 18, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

October 8, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 5, 2019

Last Verified

October 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 0000260894

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Musculoskeletal Pain

Clinical Trials on Resistance training

Subscribe