- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT03518450
Femoral Triangle Block: Early Mobilization and Postoperative Analgesia After Total Knee Arthroplasty
Early Mobilization and Postoperative Analgesia After Total Knee Arthroplasty, a Prospective Comparative Study: Adductor Canal Block vs. Femoral Nerve Block vs. Apex Femoral Triangle Block
The objective of this trial is to compare the efficacy of three different nerve blocks as an analgesic option after total knee arthroplasty (TKA), based on muscle strength, mobilization and pain.
The Adductor Canal Block has been proposed as an equally effective technique to the Femoral Nerve Block in terms of pain control after a TKA, with the benefit of preserving muscle function. We hypothesize that a block performed at the apex of the femoral triangle would best balance analgesia with quadriceps function.
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
-
Barcelona, Spain, 08035
- Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Subjects of any gender, from 18 to 90 years old that accept to participate in the study.
- Programmed primary total knee arthroplasty surgery
Exclusion Criteria:
- Emergent surgery
- Reinterventions
- Unstable psychiatric pathology, dementia
- Kidney or hepatic disease that contraindicates the use of NSAIDs and/or Paracetamol.
- Allergy to amides local anesthesics, NSAIDs, opioids and/or Paracetamol.
- Daily use of opioids greater than 30 mg of morphine (or equivalent)
- Patients under 18 or over 90 years old.
- Drug abuse
- Rejection to be a participant of the study.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Double
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Active Comparator: Femoral Nerve Block
Ultrasound guided femoral nerve block, 30 ml of 0.25% bupivacaine and 4 mg of dexamethasone to be administered.
|
Regional anesthetic technique that blocks the sensory and motor information of the femoral nerve (and it's branches).
|
|
Active Comparator: Adductor Canal Block
Ultrasound guided adductor canal block, at the proximal third of the canal, 30 ml of 0.25% bupivacaine and 4 mg of dexamethasone to be administered.
|
Interfascial block that targets mainly the saphenous nerve.
|
|
Experimental: Apex Femoral Triangle Block
Ultrasound guided femoral triangle block, at the distal third of the triangle, 30 ml of 0.25% bupivacaine and 4 mg of dexamethasone to be administered.
|
Nerve block that aims the vastus medialis nerve, the saphenous nerve and the anterior femoral cutaneous nerve.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Maximum voluntary isometric contraction (MVIC)
Time Frame: 6 hours postoperatively
|
It measures quadriceps strength and is normalized to the body mass index (N * m/kg). This test correlates well with the functional outcome. Will be measured with standard handheld dynamometer (MicroFET2; Hoogan Industries, West Jordan, Utah) perpendicular to the tibial crest 5 cm proximal to the medial malleolus to make the measurement. The patients are told to "reach maximum force and hold for three seconds." Three measurements will be done, and the average will be taken. The primary effectiveness endpoints of the study will be the percentage of baselineMVIC retained on the quadriceps of the leg receiving arthroplasty for each subject at 6 hours postoperatively. A higher the percentage will relate with less motor block. |
6 hours postoperatively
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Timed Up and Go (TUG)
Time Frame: 6, 24 and 48 hours postoperatively.
|
Timed Up and Go gauges a patient's sense of balance by measuring the time required for a certain set of movements: stand up from a chair, walk 3 m, walk back, and sit down. It has been verified to serve as a good indicator of functional level. Measured in seconds, the better values are related to shorter times. |
6, 24 and 48 hours postoperatively.
|
|
30' CST (30 secs Chair Stand Test)
Time Frame: 6, 24 and 48 hours postoperatively.
|
How many times can a patient stand up and sit down from a chair in 30 seconds.
The amount of times will be counted, more times will be related to a better outcome.
|
6, 24 and 48 hours postoperatively.
|
|
Range of Motion (ROM)
Time Frame: 6, 24 and 48 hours postoperatively.
|
Range of motion refers to a knee's degree of extension or flexion and is measured via a goniometer.
Considering normal values from 0-120º, the baseline movement will be measured preoperatively to be compared postoperatively.
|
6, 24 and 48 hours postoperatively.
|
|
Daniels' Test
Time Frame: 6, 24 and 48 hours postoperatively.
|
Active extension of the knee against gravity and applied resistance (0-5).
5: normal contraction against gravity and maximal resistance.
0: abscence of contraction.
|
6, 24 and 48 hours postoperatively.
|
|
10-PMS (10 point Mobility Scale)
Time Frame: 6, 24 and 48 hours postoperatively.
|
Scale from 0-10 in which the mobility of the patient is measured; sitting on the bed, chair, edge of the bed, mobilize the knee more than 45º, stand up, walk with or without a mobility aid. Higher values are related to better outcomes. An expected degree of flexion of the knee is ≥45 degrees on postoperative day 1 and ≥70 degrees on postoperative day 3. Expected points for postoperative day 0: 4 points Expected points for postoperative day 1: 8 points Expected points for postoperative day 2: 9-10 points |
6, 24 and 48 hours postoperatively.
|
|
Pain measurement trough the visual analogue scale (VAS)
Time Frame: 6, 24 and 48 hours postoperatively.
|
Pain will be measured via the VAS pain score by having the patient point on an unmarked scale how their pain was and then translating it to millimeters on the 100-mm scale. 0 mm: no pain 100 mm: severe/extreme pain |
6, 24 and 48 hours postoperatively.
|
|
Quantity of opioids administered
Time Frame: 6, 24 and 48 hours postoperatively.
|
into morphine equivalent if needed.
|
6, 24 and 48 hours postoperatively.
|
|
APS-POQ-R.
Time Frame: At 24 hours postoperatively
|
Developed by an interdisciplinary task force of members of the American Pain Society, the Patient Outcome Questionnaire (APS-POQ) for QI has been revised to include instrument psychometrics.
The article is available by open access at The Journal of Pain web site.
|
At 24 hours postoperatively
|
|
Patient satisfaction
Time Frame: 24 and 48 hours postoperatively
|
Scale from 0 to 10, answering how do they feel about the treatment received, being 10 the maximum value related to the highest satisfaction level.
|
24 and 48 hours postoperatively
|
|
Length of hospital stay
Time Frame: at patient discharge, an average of 6 days postoperatively
|
Days from surgery until discharge.
|
at patient discharge, an average of 6 days postoperatively
|
|
Maximum voluntary isometric contraction (MVIC)
Time Frame: 24 and 48 hours postoperatively.
|
It measures quadriceps strength and is normalized to the body mass index (N * m/kg). This test correlates well with the functional outcome. Will be measured with standard handheld dynamometer (MicroFET2; Hoogan Industries, West Jordan, Utah) perpendicular to the tibial crest 5 cm proximal to the medial malleolus to make the measurement. The patients are told to "reach maximum force and hold for three seconds." Three measurements will be done, and the average will be taken. The primary effectiveness endpoints of the study will be the percentage of baselineMVIC retained on the quadriceps of the leg receiving arthroplasty for each subject at 6, 24, and 48 hours postoperatively. A higher the percentage will relate with less motor block. |
24 and 48 hours postoperatively.
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Investigators
- Study Director: Alfons Biarnes Suñe, M.D., Ph.D.
- Principal Investigator: Carlos I Salvadores de Arzuaga, M.D.
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Jaeger P, Nielsen ZJ, Henningsen MH, Hilsted KL, Mathiesen O, Dahl JB. Adductor canal block versus femoral nerve block and quadriceps strength: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover study in healthy volunteers. Anesthesiology. 2013 Feb;118(2):409-15. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e318279fa0b.
- Abdallah FW, Whelan DB, Chan VW, Prasad GA, Endersby RV, Theodoropolous J, Oldfield S, Oh J, Brull R. Adductor Canal Block Provides Noninferior Analgesia and Superior Quadriceps Strength Compared with Femoral Nerve Block in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction. Anesthesiology. 2016 May;124(5):1053-64. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000001045.
- Sharma S, Iorio R, Specht LM, Davies-Lepie S, Healy WL. Complications of femoral nerve block for total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2010 Jan;468(1):135-40. doi: 10.1007/s11999-009-1025-1. Epub 2009 Aug 13.
- Chelly JE, Greger J, Gebhard R, Coupe K, Clyburn TA, Buckle R, Criswell A. Continuous femoral blocks improve recovery and outcome of patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2001 Jun;16(4):436-45. doi: 10.1054/arth.2001.23622.
- Burckett-St Laurant D, Peng P, Giron Arango L, Niazi AU, Chan VW, Agur A, Perlas A. The Nerves of the Adductor Canal and the Innervation of the Knee: An Anatomic Study. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2016 May-Jun;41(3):321-7. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0000000000000389.
- Bendtsen TF, Moriggl B, Chan V, Borglum J. The Optimal Analgesic Block for Total Knee Arthroplasty. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2016 Nov/Dec;41(6):711-719. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0000000000000485.
- Wong WY, Bjorn S, Strid JM, Borglum J, Bendtsen TF. Defining the Location of the Adductor Canal Using Ultrasound. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2017 Mar/Apr;42(2):241-245. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0000000000000539.
- Paul JE, Arya A, Hurlburt L, Cheng J, Thabane L, Tidy A, Murthy Y. Femoral nerve block improves analgesia outcomes after total knee arthroplasty: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Anesthesiology. 2010 Nov;113(5):1144-62. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e3181f4b18.
- Dong CC, Dong SL, He FC. Comparison of Adductor Canal Block and Femoral Nerve Block for Postoperative Pain in Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Medicine (Baltimore). 2016 Mar;95(12):e2983. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000002983.
- Danninger T, Opperer M, Memtsoudis SG. Perioperative pain control after total knee arthroplasty: An evidence based review of the role of peripheral nerve blocks. World J Orthop. 2014 Jul 18;5(3):225-32. doi: 10.5312/wjo.v5.i3.225. eCollection 2014 Jul 18.
- Elkassabany NM, Antosh S, Ahmed M, Nelson C, Israelite C, Badiola I, Cai LF, Williams R, Hughes C, Mariano ER, Liu J. The Risk of Falls After Total Knee Arthroplasty with the Use of a Femoral Nerve Block Versus an Adductor Canal Block: A Double-Blinded Randomized Controlled Study. Anesth Analg. 2016 May;122(5):1696-703. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000001237.
- Kardash KJ, Noel GP. The SPANK Block: A Selective Sensory, Single-Injection Solution for Posterior Pain After Total Knee Arthroplasty. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2016 Jan-Feb;41(1):118-9. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0000000000000330. No abstract available.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Actual)
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- PR(AG)299/2017
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.