Intraoperative Ultrasound Guided Glioma Surgery; a Randomised, Controlled Trial. (US-GLIOMA)

January 9, 2020 updated by: A.J.P.E. VIncent, Erasmus Medical Center

Intraoperative Ultrasound Guidance and Extent of Resection in High Grade Glioma Surgery: a Randomised, Controlled Trial.

The main goal of high grade glioma (HGG) surgery is to achieve gross total resection (GTR) without causing new neurological deficits1-8. Intraoperative navigated high resolution ultrasound (US) is a promising new tool to acquire real-time intraoperative images to localize and to resect gliomas9-12. The aim of this study was to investigate whether intraoperative guided surgery leads to a higher rate of GTR, when compared with standard non-ultrasound guided surgery.

Study Overview

Status

Unknown

Conditions

Detailed Description

Study design:

The US-GLIOMA study is a randomized controlled trial with blinded primary outcome measure.

Study population:

Fifty patients with newly diagnosed contrast enhancing presumed high grade glioma on first MRI scan.

Intervention:

The study consists of two treatment arms: non-ultrasound guided glioma resection (conventional treatment) versus ultrasound guided glioma resection (intervention) .

Main study parameters/endpoints:

  • Gross total resection (yes/no)
  • Extent of resection (%)
  • Neurological outcome (Karnofsky Performance Status)
  • Quality of Life (EORTC QLQ-C30 and QLQ-BN20 quality of life questionnaire)
  • Surgery associated neurological deficits (National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale)
  • Adverse events (classified according to the US National Cancer Institute common toxicity criteria version 4.0)
  • Survival time (days)

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

50

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Zuid-Holland
      • Rotterdam, Zuid-Holland, Netherlands
        • Erasmus MC

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Individuals of 18 years or older
  • Newly diagnosed, untreated, contrast enhancing presumed high-grade glioma
  • KPS ≥ 60
  • Preoperative intention to perform gross-total resection of the enhancing tumor
  • Written informed consent conform ICH-GCP

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Tumours crossing the midline basal ganglia, cerebellum, or brain stem prohibiting gross total resection
  • Multifocal contrast enhancing lesions
  • Pre-existing neurological deficit (e.g. aphasia, hemiparesis) due to neurological diseases (e.g. stroke)
  • Inability to give consent because of dysphasia or language barrier

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Ultrasound
ultrasound navigation guided surgery.
during surgery, the neurosurgeon will acquire ultrasound guided images (fused with the standard neuronavigation system) to evaluate the progress of tumor resection.
No Intervention: Non-ultrasound
standard surgery without ultrasound guidance.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Gross total resection (Yes or No)
Time Frame: within 48 hours after surgery
Gross-total resection (yes vs. no): No residual contrast enhancement on post-operative MRI scans; 100% of all contrast enhancing tumor has been resected when compared to initial enhancing tumor on pre-operative MRI scans.
within 48 hours after surgery

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Extent of resection (%)
Time Frame: within 48 hours after surgery
as a continous variable The extent of resection (%) is a secondary outcome measurement defined as the residual tumor volumes on post-operative MRI studies compared to the operative tumor volume.
within 48 hours after surgery
Neurological outcome (Karnofsky Performance status)
Time Frame: within 1 week after surgery
Karnofsky Performance status
within 1 week after surgery
Quality of Life (QLQ C30 questionnaires)
Time Frame: 1, 3 and 6 months after surgery

QLQ C30 questionnaires

A brain tumor specific quality of life measurement tool

1, 3 and 6 months after surgery
Quality of Life (QLQ BN20 questionnaires)
Time Frame: 1, 3 and 6 months after surgery

QLQ BN20 questionnaires

A brain tumor specific quality of life measurement tool

1, 3 and 6 months after surgery
Surgery associated neurological deficits (National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale)
Time Frame: 1 month after surgery

National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale

0 No stroke symptoms 1-4 Minor stroke 5-15 Moderate stroke 16-20 Moderate to severe stroke 21-42 Severe stroke

NIHSS is a tool used by healthcare providers to objectively quantify the impairment caused typically by a stroke, however it is also used for tumor studies to assess functioning on the level of speech, motor and sensory functions.

1 month after surgery
Survival (time in days)
Time Frame: status will be checked 15 months after surgery

time measured from surgery until death in days.

This study has a follow up of 6 months. However, when patients are alive at months after surgery, we will contact the general practictioner of the patient 15 months after the trial to obtain survival data.

status will be checked 15 months after surgery

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

November 1, 2016

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 31, 2019

Study Completion (Anticipated)

August 1, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 2, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 9, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

May 21, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

January 13, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 9, 2020

Last Verified

January 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Glioma

Clinical Trials on ultrasound guided surgery.

3
Subscribe