Cardiac Arrest Survival Score (CRASS) (CRASS)

February 4, 2020 updated by: German Resuscitation Registry

Cardiac Arrest Survival Score (CRASS) - a Tool to Predict Good Neurological Outcome After Out of Hospital Cardiac Arrest

Survival following cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) from out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) depends on numerous prehospital and in-hospital variables and interventions. The aim of this study was to develop a score to predict the resuscitation outcome after OHCA at hospital discharge.

All patients suffered OHCA between 01.01.2010 and 31.12.2016 with ROSC or ongoing CPR at hospital admission in Emergency Medical Service (EMS) systems with good quality in documentation in the German Resuscitation Registry (GRR) were included. The study population was divided into development dataset (5,775) and validation dataset (1,457) by random. Binary logistic regression analysis was used to derive the score. Hospital discharge with good neurological function (CPC 1-2 or mRS 0-2) was used as dependent variable, and various combination of potential predictor variables were used to create the model.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

This study is a retrospective analysis of 8,603 prospectively documented OHCA patients between 01.01.2010 and 31.12.2016 within the German Resuscitation Registry (GRR),4 attended by EMS. The GRR represents currently approximately 160 emergency medical systems who record data on out-of-hospital resuscitation attempts throughout Germany, thus encompassing approximately 30 million citizens (total population of Germany counts 85 million).

The German Resuscitation Registry for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest is divided into two different datasets:

  1. The 'Preclinical care' dataset originated from the Utstein-style template aiming at documentation of pre-hospital logistic issues, presumed aetiology, resuscitation therapy and patient's initial outcome including 118 variables.12
  2. The 'Postresuscitation care' dataset is aimed at documentation of in-hospital post-resuscitation efforts. The participating hospitals can choose between a basic version which includes the use of coronary angiography, temperature management and the status at hospital discharged and an extended version. This includes 156 variables and inquires especially the status at admission, initial blood gas analysis, temperature management, coronary angiography and survival at 24h after cardiac arrest, 30 days and at hospital discharge exactly.12 Participation in the registry is voluntary. The participating emergency medical services and hospitals submit their data anonymously into a central database via a web-based application. Multiple plausibility checks have been implemented into this application in order to improve data quality. The registry is organised and funded by the German Society of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine (DGAI).

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

8603

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Between 01.01.2010 and 31.12.2016 the 'Preclinical care' dataset contained 8,603 out-of-hospital CA patients with return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) or ongoing CPR at hospital admission in EMS systems with good documentation quality.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • OHCA between 01.01.2010 and 31.12.2016
  • ROSC or ongoing CPR on hopsital admission
  • high quality documentation with more than 75% documentation of post resuscitation care in hospital
  • Patients cases documented in German Resuscitation Registry

Between 01.01.2010 and 31.12.2016 the 'Preclinical care' dataset contained 8,603 out-of-hospital CA patients with return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) or ongoing CPR at hospital admission in EMS systems with good documentation quality. Good quality of documentation was defined by documented post-resuscitation care in more than 75%.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • incomplete dataset
  • age less than 18 years
  • unknown initial ECG
  • unknown age
  • unknown neurological status on hospital discharge

1,371 patients were excluded from further analysis because of incomplete data in terms of age, neurological status at hospital discharge, unknown initial EKG or age < 18 years.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Cohort
  • Time Perspectives: Prospective

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Development
The study population was divided into two parts by random: development dataset (5,775) and validation dataset (1,457)
Outcome with good neurological status vs. bad neurological status at hospital discharge
Validation
The study population was divided into two parts by random: development dataset (5,775) and validation dataset (1,457)
Outcome with good neurological status vs. bad neurological status at hospital discharge

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
good neurological outcome
Time Frame: 30 days after OHCA
CPC 1 and 2 or mRS 0-2
30 days after OHCA

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: Jan-Thorsten Gräsner, MD, Institute for Emergency Medicine, Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Kiel, Germany

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 1, 2010

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 31, 2016

Study Completion (Actual)

December 31, 2016

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 16, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 16, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

June 27, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

February 5, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 4, 2020

Last Verified

February 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Cardiac Arrest

Clinical Trials on Survival / not survival

3
Subscribe