Strategy Training for People With Aphasia After Stroke

August 30, 2021 updated by: Elizabeth R. Skidmore, PhD, OTR/L, University of Pittsburgh
One-third to one-half of acute strokes result in newly acquired cognitive impairments. Approximately 30 to 40% of people in the acute phase of stroke also sustain communication impairments. Stroke-related cognitive impairments are associated with significant functional disability, as indicated by the inability to regain independence in daily activities. The overall aim of this study is to examine the feasibility of an adapted form of strategy training for people with communication impairments who are admitted to inpatient rehabilitation. These analyses will address a critical gap in current rehabilitation research, namely the exclusion of people with communication impairments in acute stroke rehabilitation clinical trials, and provide pilot data to inform the design of future inclusive clinical trials seeking to reduce disability after stroke.

Study Overview

Status

Terminated

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

This pilot study will use a descriptive case series design with repeated measures to assess the feasibility of an adapted form of strategy training for people with communication impairments after acute stroke. The investigators will recruit people with aphasia due to stroke admitted to the inpatient rehabilitation units and administer the adapted form of strategy training one session per day 5 days per week for 10-15 sessions. The investigators will assess the feasibility of the intervention based on feedback from participants and therapists. These data will serve as pilot data to inform the design of a future clinical trials for people with cognitive impairments after stroke, including people with communication impairments. These efforts will allow the investigators to test new models to support optimal interventions for individuals with stroke-related cognitive impairments, including people with communication impairments who are among those most vulnerable for long-term disability.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

16

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Pennsylvania
      • Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States, 15260
        • University of Pittsburgh

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • primary diagnosis of acute stroke
  • admission to acute rehabilitation
  • mild to moderate aphasia but able to understand and express communication with verbal, written, and/or augmentative communication (score of 1 or 2 on the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale item 9, or score 1 to 5 on the Boston Diagnostic Aphasia Examination Severity Scale)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • pre-stroke diagnosis of dementia
  • severe global aphasia (Boston Diagnostic Aphasia Examination Severity Scale score of 0)
  • dysarthria as the only communication impairment (score of 1 or 2 two on the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale item 10, but score of 0 on item 9)
  • current major depressive disorder (unless treated and in partial remission), bipolar disorder, or any other psychotic disorder (indicated by PRIME-MD)severe global aphasia (Boston Diagnostic Aphasia Examination Severity Scale score of 0)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Strategy Training
Strategy training is a form of meta-cognitive instruction that trains individuals with stroke-related cognitive impairments to identify and prioritize problematic daily activities, identify the barriers impeding performance, generate and evaluate their own strategies to address barriers, and apply these skills through iterative practice.
This study will use an adapted form of strategy training for people with communication impairments.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Mean Patient-therapist Communication Score
Time Frame: Baseline to Post-Intervention (up to 3 weeks)
Measure of Participation in Conversation (MPC) Interaction score greater than or equal to 2. The scale assesses the degree of participation executed by the participant with communication impairment during supported conversation. Scores range from 0=no participation/comprehension to 4=full participation/comprehension.
Baseline to Post-Intervention (up to 3 weeks)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Independence With Daily Activities
Time Frame: Baseline to 6 months
Change in independence measured with the Functional Independence Measure. The FIM assesses 18 tasks in 6 functional domains (self-care, sphincter control, transfers, locomotion, communication and social cognition) using a scale of 1 (dependent) to 7 (independent). Scores range from 18 to 126. Higher values represent better outcomes. The a priori criterion for change was a medium effect size of change (Cohen's d≥0.5).
Baseline to 6 months
Change in Cognition
Time Frame: Baseline to 6 months
Change in cognition measured with the Cognitive Linguistic Quick Test Executive Function Score. The severity score measures executive functions using 4 tasks (symbol trails, generative naming, mazes, and design generation). The score ranges from 40 (within normal limits) to 0 (severe impairment). Higher values represent better outcomes. The a priori criterion for change was a medium effect size of change (Cohen's d≥0.5).
Baseline to 6 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Elizabeth R. Skidmore, PhD, OTR/L, University of Pittsburgh

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

July 23, 2018

Primary Completion (Actual)

August 1, 2020

Study Completion (Actual)

August 1, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 22, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 10, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

July 20, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

September 24, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 30, 2021

Last Verified

August 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • PRO18050075
  • R01HD074693 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Strategy Training

Clinical Trials on Strategy Training

Subscribe