Incorporating Strategy Training Into Naming Treatment in Aphasia

March 11, 2024 updated by: Sofia Vallila Rohter, MGH Institute of Health Professions

Incorporating Strategy Training Into Naming Treatment to Improve Generalization in Aphasia

This study incorporates metacognitive strategy training into semantic feature analysis treatment. Semantic feature analysis treatment has a strong evidence base and capacity to improve word retrieval by encouraging circumlocution. Circumlocution facilitates self-cued naming and assists listener comprehension when naming fails. However, semantic feature analysis treatment does not include direct techniques to teach patients with aphasia to generalize the use of semantic feature analysis treatment's circumlocution procedure. Therefore, this study proposes that combining semantic feature analysis treatment and metacognitive strategy training will stimulate the semantic system and increase patients with aphasias' use of circumlocution across divergent contexts.

This study aims to measure the treatment's effect on naming accuracy for trained and untrained items. The study also aim to measure the treatment's effect on people with aphasias' knowledge of the strategy components and changes in verbalizations during retrieval attempts. The central hypothesis is that strategy training will increase patients with aphasias' explicit knowledge about circumlocution and enable them to use it to (1) self-facilitate naming, and (2) produce more informative connected speech.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Every 40 seconds, someone in the United States suffers from a stroke. Approximately 25% of stroke survivors acquire aphasia, a communication disorder that can result in a partial or total loss of spoken and written language ability, which significantly and negatively impacts quality of life and societal participation. The ability to verbally label objects, referred to as 'naming' in the literature, is impaired in all patients with aphasia. Naming is, therefore, a common focus of treatment. Naming treatments improve people with aphasias' naming ability for items that are directly trained during therapy. However, these same treatments face two critical limitations: (1) inconsistent generalization to untrained items, and (2) little to no generalization to spontaneous, connected speech. As it is impossible to train the entire universe of objects during a patient's course of therapy, generalization of gains beyond what is trained in therapy is crucial.

Recent work shows that patients with aphasias' learning success depends on their ability to develop optimal strategies that support learning, but that they do not develop these strategies independently. There is also evidence that through explicit strategy training, patients with aphasia can learn to implement and generalize the use of strategies that are known to support learning, and carry over their use across multiple environments. As such, it is predicted that naming treatment outcomes would be greatly improved by incorporating strategy training into treatment.

This study proposes to incorporate strategy training into naming treatment to improve generalization. Circumlocution, a verbal behavior in which patients with aphasia describe an object's features if they are unable to name it, is known to facilitate naming and assist listener comprehension. Semantic Feature Analysis is a well-regarded naming treatment thought to encourage circumlocution. Semantic Feature Analysis treatment does not include direct techniques that teach patients with aphasia how to generalize the use of the treatment's circumlocution procedure. In fact, no studies have explicitly trained patients with aphasia how to use the circumlocution procedure they learn in Semantic Feature Analysis treatment during everyday communication. Rather, it is assumed that patients with aphasia will implicitly learn how to use the procedure, through repeated practice and habituation alone. This study proposes that strategy training is the integral missing piece that will successfully result in people with aphasias' generalized application of the semantic feature analysis procedure.

The objective of the proposed research is to determine whether naming treatment that incorporates strategy training results in people with aphasias' increased use of circumlocution. The central hypothesis is that strategy training will increase patients with aphasias' explicit knowledge about circumlocution and enable them to use it to (1) self-facilitate naming, and (2) produce more informative connected speech. It is predicted that increased use of circumlocution will result in generalization at both the impairment level (naming) and participation level (effective communication).

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

10

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Massachusetts
      • Boston, Massachusetts, United States, 02129
        • MGH-Institute of Health Professions

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 89 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion criteria:

  • Experienced a single left-hemisphere stroke,
  • Have aphasia due to stroke,
  • Be in the chronic stages of their aphasia, at least 6 months post onset of stroke.
  • Be between the ages of 18 and 89 years of age, and
  • Be a proficient English speaker,
  • Have no history of neurodegenerative disease, motor speech disorder, significant mental illness, psychiatric disorder, drug/alcohol abuse, or neurological condition that could influence their cognitive, language, and memory systems.

Exclusion criteria:

  • Experienced multiple strokes;
  • Be in the acute stage of their aphasia, <6 months post onset of stroke;
  • Have a diagnosis of neurodegenerative disease, significant mental illness, psychiatric disorder, drug/alcohol abuse, or neurological condition that could influence cognitive, language, and memory systems

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Semantic Feature Analysis plus metacognitive strategy training
Participants attend three treatment sessions per week for eight weeks. Treatment sessions include: strategy education (participants learn about anomia, circumlocution, and circumlocution's purpose), Semantic Feature Analysis plus strategy application (participants build self-awareness and practice circumlocution), and strategy debriefing (participants reflect and receive feedback on their performance, and generate scenarios in which they could use the strategy in everyday life).
The strategy training of focus in this study is metacognitive strategy training intended to build awareness of naming and methods to overcome instances of difficult naming. Strategy training involves (a) teaching the participant to identify instances in which they are unable to name objects, (b) learn a 6-feature framework (e.g. group, use, action) that has been identified to support semantic feature activation in aphasia, (c) learn and practice strategies to utilize the framework in instances of word finding difficulty

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Naming accuracy
Time Frame: Change from baseline at 6 months
Number of pictures named accurately when looking at a series of 176 object pictures
Change from baseline at 6 months
Strategy Use
Time Frame: Change from baseline at 6 months
Number of instances of circumlocution in moments of naming difficulty when looking at a series of 176 object pictures
Change from baseline at 6 months
Strategy Knowledge
Time Frame: Change from baseline at 6 months
Number of strategy components (out of 6) participants identify (verbally or gesturally) independently
Change from baseline at 6 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Content Information Units
Time Frame: Change from baseline at 6 months
Number of content information units (CIUs) in connected speech samples when describing pictures and telling stories.
Change from baseline at 6 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Collaborators

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Sofia Vallila Rohter, PhD, MGH Institute of Health Professions

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

August 30, 2021

Primary Completion (Actual)

May 11, 2022

Study Completion (Actual)

May 11, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 22, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 23, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

April 1, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 13, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 11, 2024

Last Verified

March 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

Investigators will share de-identified data sets, statistical analysis codes and experimental set-ups with interested researchers, educators or clinicians. Materials generated under the project will be disseminated in accordance with NIH policies.

IPD Sharing Time Frame

Data requests can be submitted starting 9 months after article publication and will be made accessible for up to 24 months

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

Access to trial individual participant data can be requested by qualified researchers engaging in independent scientific research, and will be provided following review and approval of a research proposal and Statistical Analysis Plan (SAP) and execution of a Data Sharing Agreement (DSA).

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Aphasia

  • Teachers College, Columbia University
    Recruiting
    Aphasia | Aphasia, Acquired | Aphasia, Broca | Aphasia Non Fluent | Aphasia, Anomic | Aphasia Following Cerebral Infarction | Aphasia, Mixed | Aphasia, Expressive | Aphasia, Conduction | Aphasia, Rehabilitation
    United States
  • University of South Carolina
    National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders (NIDCD)
    Completed
    Stroke | Aphasia | Stroke, Ischemic | Aphasia, Broca | Aphasia, Anomic | Aphasia, Global | Aphasia, Fluent | Aphasia, Mixed | Aphasia, Jargon | Aphasia, Expressive | Aphasia, Conduction
    United States
  • Maya Henry
    National Institutes of Health (NIH); National Institute on Aging (NIA)
    Recruiting
    Semantic Dementia | Logopenic Progressive Aphasia | Nonfluent Aphasia, Progressive | Logopenic Variant Primary Progressive Aphasia | Semantic Variant Primary Progressive Aphasia (svPPA) | Nonfluent Variant Primary Progressive Aphasia (nfvPPA) | Progressive Aphasia | Logopenic Progressive Aphasia... and other conditions
    United States
  • University of California, Berkeley
    University of California, San Francisco; National Institute on Deafness and... and other collaborators
    Recruiting
    Aphasia | Aphasia, Acquired | Aphasia Following Cerebral Infarction | Aphasia, Non-fluent | Aphasia, Fluent | Aphasia Following Nontraumatic Intracerebral Hemorrhage
    United States
  • Maya Henry
    National Institute on Aging (NIA)
    Recruiting
    Logopenic Variant Primary Progressive Aphasia | Progressive Aphasia | Logopenic Progressive Aphasia (LPA) | Primary Progressive Aphasia(PPA) | Logopenic Variant of Primary Progressive Aphasia (LPA) | Progressive Aphasia in Alzheimer's Disease
    United States
  • University of Texas at Austin
    University of California, San Francisco; National Institute on Deafness and...
    Active, not recruiting
    Primary Progressive Aphasia | Aphasia | Semantic Dementia | Logopenic Progressive Aphasia | Semantic Memory Disorder | Nonfluent Aphasia, Progressive | Aphasia, Progressive
    United States
  • University of Texas at Austin
    National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders (NIDCD)
    Enrolling by invitation
    Primary Progressive Aphasia | Aphasia | Semantic Dementia | Logopenic Progressive Aphasia | Semantic Memory Disorder | Nonfluent Aphasia, Progressive | Aphasia, Progressive
    United States
  • Institute for Bioengineering of Catalonia
    Hospital Universitari Joan XXIII de Tarragona.; Universitat Pompeu Fabra
    Completed
    Aphasia | Aphasia, Broca | Aphasia, Wernicke | Aphasia, Fluent | Aphasia, Nonfluent
    Spain
  • Flint Rehabilitation Devices, LLC
    University of Texas
    Completed
    Broca Aphasia
    United States
  • Mayo Clinic
    National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders (NIDCD)
    Recruiting
    Primary Progressive Aphasia | Apraxia of Speech | PPA | Non-fluent Aphasia | Primary Progressive Non-fluent Aphasia
    United States

Clinical Trials on Strategy training

Subscribe