- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT04537000
Individualized Strategies of Red Blood Cell Transfusion for Perioperative Pediatric Patients
August 4, 2022 updated by: Children's Hospital of Fudan University
The individualized strategies of red blood cell for perioperative pediatric patients are made based on the comparison between the clinical condition score and the Hb concentration.
Study Overview
Status
Withdrawn
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
The hypothesis is that the individual transfusion strategies will help to save blood resource, and meanwhile will not adversely affect the patients' clinical outcomes.
Participants will be randomly divided into two groups, where the strategies of transfusion of red blood cell will be made following different principles.
The strategies for patients in control group will be made by the attending doctors in charge according to the current Chinese red blood cell transfusion guidelines.
For the patients in study group, the clinical condition will be identified every time red blood cell transfusion is considered.
The strategies will be made according to the comparison between the score and the Hb concentration.
The volume of the red blood cell used in these two groups will be compared.
The number of patients who need transfusion in these two groups will be compared.
The clinical outcomes will also be compared between the two groups.
Study Type
Interventional
Phase
- Not Applicable
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
1 month to 18 years (Child, Adult)
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Genders Eligible for Study
All
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- The Hb concentration is tested before operation. It is higher than 7g/dl and lower than 10g/dl. Or it is anticipated that it will decrease lower than 10g/dl.
Exclusion Criteria:
- The patient will not undergo an operation.
- newborn or premature baby
- patients accompanied with hemorrhagic disease or cyanotic heart disease
- patients with ischemic heart disease or ischemic cerebrovascular disease
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Health Services Research
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Double
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
---|---|
No Intervention: control group
The strategies of red blood cell transfusion for the pediatric patients in this group will be made by the attending doctors in charge based on the current transfusion guidelines.
The attending doctors decide when to start blood red cell transfusion and order the volume of the blood red cell as the usual clinical practice.
|
|
Experimental: study group
For study group, the clinical condition score must be identified every time red blood cell transfusion is considered.
The strategies of red blood cell transfusion for the pediatric patients in this group, including the trigger and the volume, will be made based on the comparison between the clinical condition score and the Hb concentration.
|
A score is firstly identified using a clinical condition scale including the concentration of inspired oxygen to maintain the percutaneous oxygen saturation (SPO2)≧95%, the fusion rate of catecholamine drugs to maintain normal blood pressure, the nasopharyngeal temperature and the oxygen saturation of central venous blood.
The score was graded as 0, 1 and 2 points according to the patient's clinical condition.
The score identified from the scale plus 7 finally makes the clinical condition score.
If the score is higher than 10, it will be replaced with 10.
That is to say, the highest clinical condition score is 10.
If the clinical condition score≦Hb, blood red cell transfusion will not be started.
If the clinical condition score>Hb, blood red cell transfusion will be started, and the volume will be calculated using the following formulation, transfusion volume(ml)=(clinical condition score - Hb)*body weight *5.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
the volume of red blood cell (RBC) used adjusted to body weight
Time Frame: baseline through 3 days after surgery
|
This is a repeated measurement data.
The volume of RBC used adjusted to body weight = the volume of RBC (ml) used/ body weight(Kg).
It is repeatedly recorded during this time frame.
The data for intraoperation phase, for postoperation phase and for both intraoperation and postoperation phase are analyzed.The data would be measured at baseline (before operation), at the end of operation and on the 3rd days after operation.
|
baseline through 3 days after surgery
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
hemoglobin (Hb) concentration
Time Frame: baseline through 3 days after surgery
|
Hb concentration is assessed by blood gas test.
It is a repeated measurement data.
|
baseline through 3 days after surgery
|
heart rate
Time Frame: during operation(about 2-6 hours)
|
It is a repeated measurement data.
It is recorded every 5-10 minutes during this time frame .
|
during operation(about 2-6 hours)
|
blood pressure(Systolic)
Time Frame: during operation (about 2-6 hours)
|
It is a repeated measurement data.
It is (Systolic blood pressure ) recorded every 5-10 minutes during this time frame .
|
during operation (about 2-6 hours)
|
blood pressure(Diastolic)
Time Frame: during operation (about 2-6 hours)
|
It is a repeated measurement data.
It is ( Diastolic blood pressure ) recorded every 5-10 minutes during this time frame .
|
during operation (about 2-6 hours)
|
lactate (Lac)
Time Frame: during operation (about 2-6 hours)
|
It is a repeated measurement data.
It is recorded every time blood gas test is ordered during this time frame.
|
during operation (about 2-6 hours)
|
length of stay in post anesthesia care unit (PACU)
Time Frame: about 2-6 hours
|
the time between the arrival of the patient to the PACU to the discharge to the ward
|
about 2-6 hours
|
infection
Time Frame: from the end of operation to the 3rd month after the operation.
|
It is a binary variable.
The data will be set as "1" if the patients got any infections such as wound infection, sepsis, etc.
It will be set as "0" if there is no evidence for infection.
|
from the end of operation to the 3rd month after the operation.
|
unexpected transfer to intense care unit (ICU)
Time Frame: from the end of operation to the 3rd day after the operation.
|
It is a binary variable.
The data will be set as "1" if the patient is transferred to ICU unexpectedly.
It will set as "0" if not.
|
from the end of operation to the 3rd day after the operation.
|
length of stay in hospital after operation
Time Frame: from the date of operation to discharge (about 1-4 weeks )
|
from the date of the operation to the date when the patient is discharged
|
from the date of operation to discharge (about 1-4 weeks )
|
the number of patients who need RBC transfusion
Time Frame: baseline through 3 days after surgery
|
This is a repeated measurement data.
The number of patients who need RBC transfusion during operation and during the first 3 days after operation is recorded, respectively.
|
baseline through 3 days after surgery
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Investigators
- Study Chair: Yun Shi, Master, Children's Hospital of Fudan University
Publications and helpful links
The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.
General Publications
- Kozek-Langenecker SA, Ahmed AB, Afshari A, Albaladejo P, Aldecoa C, Barauskas G, De Robertis E, Faraoni D, Filipescu DC, Fries D, Haas T, Jacob M, Lance MD, Pitarch JVL, Mallett S, Meier J, Molnar ZL, Rahe-Meyer N, Samama CM, Stensballe J, Van der Linden PJF, Wikkelso AJ, Wouters P, Wyffels P, Zacharowski K. Management of severe perioperative bleeding: guidelines from the European Society of Anaesthesiology: First update 2016. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2017 Jun;34(6):332-395. doi: 10.1097/EJA.0000000000000630.
- Lavoie J. Blood transfusion risks and alternative strategies in pediatric patients. Paediatr Anaesth. 2011 Jan;21(1):14-24. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-9592.2010.03470.x.
- Carson JL, Carless PA, Hebert PC. Transfusion thresholds and other strategies for guiding allogeneic red blood cell transfusion. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Apr 18;4(4):CD002042. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002042.pub3.
- AABB white papers: building a better patient blood management program identifying tools, soving problems and promoting patient safety; 2015
- Carson JL, Guyatt G, Heddle NM, Grossman BJ, Cohn CS, Fung MK, Gernsheimer T, Holcomb JB, Kaplan LJ, Katz LM, Peterson N, Ramsey G, Rao SV, Roback JD, Shander A, Tobian AA. Clinical Practice Guidelines From the AABB: Red Blood Cell Transfusion Thresholds and Storage. JAMA. 2016 Nov 15;316(19):2025-2035. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.9185.
- Rouette J, Trottier H, Ducruet T, Beaunoyer M, Lacroix J, Tucci M; Canadian Critical Care Trials Group; PALISI Network. Red blood cell transfusion threshold in postsurgical pediatric intensive care patients: a randomized clinical trial. Ann Surg. 2010 Mar;251(3):421-7. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181c5dc2e.
- Zhang F, Zheng ZB, Zhu ZQ, Liu DX, Liu J. Application of Perioperative Transfusion Trigger Score in Patients Undergoing Surgical Treatment of Malignant Tumor. Indian J Hematol Blood Transfus. 2020 Jan;36(1):156-163. doi: 10.1007/s12288-019-01180-z. Epub 2019 Sep 12.
- New HV, Grant-Casey J, Lowe D, Kelleher A, Hennem S, Stanworth SJ. Red blood cell transfusion practice in children: current status and areas for improvement? A study of the use of red blood cell transfusions in children and infants. Transfusion. 2014 Jan;54(1):119-27. doi: 10.1111/trf.12313. Epub 2013 Jun 30.
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Anticipated)
May 1, 2021
Primary Completion (Anticipated)
July 1, 2022
Study Completion (Anticipated)
September 1, 2022
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
August 25, 2020
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
August 28, 2020
First Posted (Actual)
September 3, 2020
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
August 8, 2022
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
August 4, 2022
Last Verified
March 1, 2022
More Information
Terms related to this study
Other Study ID Numbers
- transfusion-08-2020
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
No
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
No
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Clinical Outcome
-
Rehabilitation Hospital TobelbadCompletedArthroplasty | Clinical Outcome
-
University of JenaUnknownTotal Knee Arthroplasty | Clinical Outcome
-
Methodist Health SystemRecruitingClinical Outcome of Pericardial Closure Using GentrixUnited States
-
Aesculap AGWithdrawnArthroplasty, Replacement, Knee | Patient Satisfaction | Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip | Clinical Outcome | Treatment CostGermany
-
The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao UniversityQilu Hospital of Shandong University; Shandong Provincial Hospital; Qianfoshan... and other collaboratorsRecruitingGastrostomy | Clinical Outcome | Computed Tomography AngiographyChina
-
Imperial College LondonJoint Replacement Instrumented Orthopaedics LtdRecruitingFocus: A Multicentre Prospective Clinical Surveillance Study Aims to Assess the Clinical, Functional and Radiological Outcome of the Furlong Evolution® Hip StemUnited Kingdom
-
Providence Little Company of Mary-TorranceViz.ai, Inc.UnknownStroke Workflow and Clinical Outcome ParametersUnited States
-
Mahidol UniversityRecruitingEndodontic Disease | Clinical OutcomeThailand
-
Southeast University, ChinaRecruiting
-
Rabin Medical CenterCompletedHip Fractures | Rehabilitation Outcome | Clinical PharmacistsIsrael
Clinical Trials on clinical condition score
-
Association des Médecins Vasculaires HospitaliersSanofi; Ministry of Health, France; Daiichi Sankyo, Inc.; LEO Pharma; University...CompletedCardiovascular Diseases | Venous Thromboembolism | Post Thrombotic SyndromeFrance
-
University Hospital, GhentCompleted
-
Assiut UniversityNot yet recruitingST-segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction (STEMI)
-
University Hospital, Clermont-FerrandAZUREA Network (www.azurea.org); ANARLF Network; Direction Générale de l'Offre...RecruitingAcute Brain Injury | Mechanical Ventilation | Altered Level of Consciousness | Mechanical Ventilator Weaning | Airway ControlFrance
-
Ospedale C & G MazzoniUnknownAnastomotic Leak | Colorectal SurgeryItaly
-
Hospices Civils de LyonRecruitingAutoimmune Encephalitis | Autoimmune Encephalitis Caused by N-Methyl D-Aspartate Receptor Antibody (Disorder)France
-
Cairo UniversityUnknownFetal MalnutritionEgypt
-
Mayo ClinicWithdrawnVentilator Associated Pneumonia
-
University of CalgaryJuvenile Diabetes Research FoundationCompletedType 1 Diabetes | Neuropathy | RetinopathyCanada
-
Rutgers, The State University of New JerseyRecruitingAggression | Problem Behavior | Self InjuryUnited States