A Caregiver-Assisted Rehabilitation With Strategy Training (CAR-ST) for Stroke Patients (CAR-ST)

February 13, 2025 updated by: Feng-Hang Chang, Taipei Medical University

A Caregiver-Assisted Rehabilitation With Strategy Training (CAR-ST) for Stroke Patients With Functional Limitations: A MultiCenter, 3-Arm Randomized Trial

The goal of this randomized controlled trial is to examine if involving the caregivers in the strategy training (i.e. caregiver-assisted rehabilitation with strategy training, CAR-ST) works to improve activity functions in community-dwelling adults after stroke. The main questions it aims to answer are:

Does CAR-ST and strategy training alone lead to greater improvements in activity performance among stroke survivors relative to the control intervention with education? Does CAR-ST outperform strategy training alone in the efficacy of activity outcomes? Do the activity effects of CAR-ST transfer to the impairment and participation domains of outcomes?

Researchers will compare the efficacy of the CAR-ST intervention against strategy training alone or control intervention (education program) to see if caregivers contribute to post-stroke functional improvements.

Participants will:

  • receive CAR-ST, strategy training only, or an education program 1 to 2 sessions per week until finishing 10 sessions.
  • be assessed clinical outcomes at 4 times: pre-intervention, post-intervention, 3-month, and 6-month follow-up.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Stroke is the leading cause of enduring disability worldwide, contributing to widespread impairments in survivors, thereby impeding various activities of daily life. Despite the effectiveness of intensive inpatient rehabilitation in mitigating deficits and activity limitations, maintaining an optimal treatment dose for patients transitioning to home remains a challenge. To address this gap, the integration of caregivers into home-based, evidence-supported rehabilitation emerges as a promising approach, yet its efficacy requires comprehensive examination. This clinical trial aims to assess the efficacy of a newly developed intervention, caregiver-assisted rehabilitation with strategy training (CAR-ST), in enhancing the activity performance of stroke survivors.

A single-blinded, three-arm randomized controlled trial will be executed, comparing the efficacy of the CAR-ST intervention against strategy training alone or attentional control through education. A procedure of randomization with minimization will be conducted by a researcher who is independent of the investigation and outcome assessments. Eligible stroke survivors and their caregivers will be recruited from collaborative hospitals in Northern Taiwan and randomly assigned with even possibility. Longitudinal evaluations will be conducted at baseline (T1), post-intervention (T2), 3-month (T3), and 6-month (T4) follow-ups, utilizing the Activity Measure for Post-Acute Care (AM-PAC) outpatient shortform as the primary outcome. Secondary outcomes will include the Participation Measure-3 Domains, 4 Dimensions (PM-3D4D), EuroQol-5D (EQ-5D), Stroke Self-Efficacy Questionnaires (SSEQ), Fugl-Meyer Assessment (FMA), Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA), and Goal Attainment Scaling (GAS). Under the principles of modified intention-to-treat, quantitative data will be analyzed using multiple linear regression models and mixed-effects regression models. If data is lost at follow-up, inferential statistical analyses for group comparisons will be conducted both with or without multiple imputation. Furthermore, qualitative in-depth interviews with participants, caregivers, and therapists will be conducted post-intervention. These interviews will explore experiences, satisfaction, and perceived effectiveness of the intervention. Transcribed data will undergo coding by two independent coders and subsequent analysis through the thematic analysis method.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

261

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

  • Name: Chang, ScD
  • Phone Number: 16040 +886-2-66202589
  • Email: ipc@tmu.edu.tw

Study Locations

      • New Taipei City, Taiwan, 235
        • Recruiting
        • Taipei Medical University-Shuang Ho Hospital,Ministry of Health and Welfare
        • Contact:
      • New Taipei City, Taiwan, 231
      • Taipei City, Taiwan, 110
        • Recruiting
        • Taipei Medical University Hospital
        • Contact:
      • Taipei City, Taiwan, 100
        • Not yet recruiting
        • National Taiwan University Hospital
        • Contact:
      • Taipei City, Taiwan, 116

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Being willing to provide informed consent
  • Diagnosis with ischemic and/or hemorrhagic stroke
  • Modified Rankin Scale (mRS) ranges from 2 to 4
  • Rehabilitation frequency less than 3 days per week
  • Having a healthy caregiver

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Undergoing palliative care
  • Major diseases or severe conditions influencing study participation, such as global aphasia, dementia, multiple organ failure, immobilization due to fracture, etc
  • Moderate post-stroke cognitive impairment, with Montreal Cognitive Assessment score <22
  • Pre-stroke mRS > 1
  • Participating in other interventional study concurrently.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Caregiver-Assisted Rehabilitation with Strategy Training (CAR-ST)
Trained therapists visit each participant once or twice weekly for 60 minutes. The program consists of 10 therapist-guided sessions over a maximum of 6 weeks and includes the following active ingredients: self-selected activity-based goals, dynamic performance analysis, global strategy ("Goal-PlanDo-Check"), massed practice, variable practice, increasing task difficulty, explicit and implicit feedback, guided discovery, action observation, and social interaction.
CAR-ST is a home-based rehabilitation that guides both stroke survivors and their caregivers to implement strategy training for addressing daily activity limitations after stroke. The caregiver, as an active partner, not only supervises the participant but also co-participates in the practice. Caregivers are instructed on when and how to provide assistance during task practice, using physical, verbal, or visual guidance. As the participant's performance improves, the caregiver is empowered to motivate them to exert greater efforts, encouraging higher repetitions, longer durations of the same task, and an increased level of difficulty.
Other Names:
  • CAR-ST
Active Comparator: Strategy Training
Participants assigned to the ST group receive a protocol similar to CAR-ST, with the distinction that their caregivers are not asked to co-participate in the intervention, and they are not instructed (by the research therapist) to provide assistance during at-home practice.
Compared to CAR-ST, ST is a home-based rehabilitation that guides stroke survivors only to implement strategy training for addressing daily activity limitations after stroke.
Other Names:
  • ST
Placebo Comparator: Education
In this arm, participants receive a dose-matched intervention with 10 visits by well-trained research therapists through face-to-face talks (primary approach), video conference, or telephone calls. Sessions focus on instruction on general information regarding stroke and rehabilitation, and a summary of participants' condition and progression is provided for each visit.
Stroke-related information and knowledge that includes stroke subtypes and their etiology, risk factors of primary and secondary stroke, healthy lifestyles, common sequala, and adaptive skills for impaired functions are provided.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Activity Measure for Post-Acute Care (AM-PAC) Outpatient Short Forms
Time Frame: 4 time points: baseline (T1), from baseline to the end of intervention at 5-10 weeks (T2), from the end of intervention to 3-month follow-up (T3), from the end of intervention to 6-month follow-up (T4)
The AM-PAC measures the difficulty is performing three activity domains: Basic Mobility (18 activities), Daily Activity (15 activities), and Applied Cognition (19 activities) on a 4-point scale. In this trial, Applied Cognition domain is viewed as a secondary outcome. A trained research assistant performs AM-PAC face-to-face with participants.
4 time points: baseline (T1), from baseline to the end of intervention at 5-10 weeks (T2), from the end of intervention to 3-month follow-up (T3), from the end of intervention to 6-month follow-up (T4)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Participation Measure-3 Domains, 4 Dimensions (PM-3D4D)
Time Frame: 4 time points: baseline (T1), from baseline to the end of intervention at 5-10 weeks (T2), from the end of intervention to 3-month follow-up (T3), from the end of intervention to 6-month follow-up (T4)
PM-3D4D consists of 24 items for evaluating three domains of participation, which are community, productivity, and social. Participants will be asked to rate all items on the four distinct dimensions: (1) diversity, (2) frequency, (3) desire for change, and (4) perceived difficulty. A trained research assistant performs PM-3D4D face-to-face with participants.
4 time points: baseline (T1), from baseline to the end of intervention at 5-10 weeks (T2), from the end of intervention to 3-month follow-up (T3), from the end of intervention to 6-month follow-up (T4)
EuroQol-5D-3L (EQ-5D-3L)
Time Frame: 4 time points: baseline (T1), from baseline to the end of intervention at 5-10 weeks (T2), from the end of intervention to 3-month follow-up (T3), from the end of intervention to 6-month follow-up (T4)
EuroQol-5D-3L (EQ-5D-3L) is a self-reported measurement that assesses participants' health-related quality of life across five domains: mobility, self-care, usual activity, pain/discomfort, anxiety/depression. In each domain, the assessment utilizes three levels to indicate the extent of problem: no problem, moderate problems, and extreme problems. A trained research assistant performs EQ-5D-3L face-to-face with participants.
4 time points: baseline (T1), from baseline to the end of intervention at 5-10 weeks (T2), from the end of intervention to 3-month follow-up (T3), from the end of intervention to 6-month follow-up (T4)
Stroke Self-Efficacy Questionnaires (SSEQ)
Time Frame: 4 time points: baseline (T1), from baseline to the end of intervention at 5-10 weeks (T2), from the end of intervention to 3-month follow-up (T3), from the end of intervention to 6-month follow-up (T4)
SSEQ measures individual confidence in functional performance after stroke [64]. It contains 13 items, and each item is rated on a 10-point scalar from 0 (not at all confident) to 10 (very confident). A trained research assistant performs SSEQ face-to-face with participants.
4 time points: baseline (T1), from baseline to the end of intervention at 5-10 weeks (T2), from the end of intervention to 3-month follow-up (T3), from the end of intervention to 6-month follow-up (T4)
Fugl-Meyer Motor Assessment (FMA)
Time Frame: 4 time points: baseline (T1), from baseline to the end of intervention at 5-10 weeks (T2), from the end of intervention to 3-month follow-up (T3), from the end of intervention to 6-month follow-up (T4)
FMA measures the motor impairments of hemiplegia and includes a proximal subscale of upper extremity (0-42 points) for the shoulder/elbow/forearm, distal subscale of upper extremity (0-24 points) for the wrist/hand, and a lower extremity subscale (0-34 points) A trained research assistant performs FMA face-to-face with participants.
4 time points: baseline (T1), from baseline to the end of intervention at 5-10 weeks (T2), from the end of intervention to 3-month follow-up (T3), from the end of intervention to 6-month follow-up (T4)
Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA)
Time Frame: 4 time points: baseline (T1), from baseline to the end of intervention at 5-10 weeks (T2), from the end of intervention to 3-month follow-up (T3), from the end of intervention to 6-month follow-up (T4)
MoCA with 30 items evaluates the cognitive functions (range: 0-30). This assessment covers domains such as visuospatial/executive skills, naming, memory, attention, language, abstraction, delayed recall, and orientation. A trained research assistant performs MoCA face-to-face with participants.
4 time points: baseline (T1), from baseline to the end of intervention at 5-10 weeks (T2), from the end of intervention to 3-month follow-up (T3), from the end of intervention to 6-month follow-up (T4)
Goal Attainment Scale (GAS)
Time Frame: 4 time points: baseline (T1), from baseline to the end of intervention at 5-10 weeks (T2), from the end of intervention to 3-month follow-up (T3), from the end of intervention to 6-month follow-up (T4)
GAS is used to quantify the achievement of goals (range -3 to 2 for each goal). A trained research assistant performs GAS face-to-face with participants.
4 time points: baseline (T1), from baseline to the end of intervention at 5-10 weeks (T2), from the end of intervention to 3-month follow-up (T3), from the end of intervention to 6-month follow-up (T4)

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS)
Time Frame: At baseline, within 4 weeks after enrollment
NIHSS is used to indicate participants' stroke severity before intervention (range 0-42).
At baseline, within 4 weeks after enrollment
modified Rankin Scale (mRS)
Time Frame: 4 time points: baseline (T1), from baseline to the end of intervention at 5-10 weeks (T2), from the end of intervention to 3-month follow-up (T3), from the end of intervention to 6-month follow-up (T4)
mRS is used to indicate participants' global disability (0-6).
4 time points: baseline (T1), from baseline to the end of intervention at 5-10 weeks (T2), from the end of intervention to 3-month follow-up (T3), from the end of intervention to 6-month follow-up (T4)
Berg Balance Scale (BBS)
Time Frame: At baseline, within 4 weeks after enrollment
BBS is used to indicate participants' balance function before intervention (0-56).
At baseline, within 4 weeks after enrollment
Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS)
Time Frame: At baseline, within 4 weeks after enrollment
HADS is used to indicate participants' mood status before intervention (0-21).
At baseline, within 4 weeks after enrollment

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Feng-Heng Chang, ScD, Graduate Institute of Injury Prevention and Control, Taipei Medical University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 17, 2025

Primary Completion (Estimated)

June 30, 2028

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2028

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 30, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 30, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

March 25, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 25, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 13, 2025

Last Verified

February 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Stroke

Clinical Trials on Caregiver-Assisted Rehabilitation with Strategy Training

Subscribe