Probiotic Effects on the Microbe-brain-gut Interaction and Brain Activity During Stress Tasks in Healthy Subjects

July 30, 2018 updated by: Robert Brummer, Örebro University, Sweden
The aim of this study is to determine if and how the "Probiotic Product" affects functional brain responses in healthy subjects during an emotional- and arithmetic stress task, respectively and in terms of microbe-brain-gut interactions.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The aim of this study is to determine if and how the "Probiotic Product" affects functional brain responses in healthy subjects during an emotional- and arithmetic stress task, respectively and in terms of microbe-brain-gut interactions.

In this randomized double-blind placebo-controlled study, n=22 healthy subjects will receive the following interventions in a crossover fashion, separated by a 4-week wash-out period: 1) Probiotic Formula, 2) placebo. After baseline assessments, study participants will start with a 4-week intervention with the study product or the placebo, followed by a 4-week wash-out period and a subsequent 4-week intervention period (placebo or study product, respectively). fMRI (functional magnetic resonance imaging) scanning during two validated stress tasks will be performed after each of the intervention periods (week 4 and week 12). At the same time points and in addition on the days before the 1st and 2nd intervention (baseline 1 and 2), saliva, blood and faecal samples will be collected. Questionnaire data will be collected and psychological tests and instruments will be performed. For one week at baseline and during the intervention periods (last week), subjects will wear actigraphs to record their physical activity and help assess sleep quality. At baseline, subjects will undergo a carbon dioxide (CO2) challenge test as well as a food diary to record dietary habits.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

22

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Örebro, Sweden, 70182
        • Örebro University, Campus USÖ, Örebro University Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 65 years (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Age: Age: 18-65 years, males/females.
  2. Signed informed consent -

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Concurrent or recent treatment with drugs affecting intestinal function or mood, e.g., antidepressants (< 12 weeks) or antibiotics (< 12 weeks).
  2. Concurrent or recent (< 4 weeks) use of nutritional supplements or herb products affecting intestinal function or mood (e.g. aloe vera, St. John´s Wort, fibers, prebiotics and probiotics).
  3. Diagnosis of major psychiatric or somatic disease. 4) Abuse of alcohol or drugs. 5) Recent (< 4 weeks) intake of proton pump inhibitors, proton pump inhibitors, PPIs (e.g., omeprazole).

6) Asthma. 7) Cardiovascular diseases. 8) Epilepsy. 9) Renal failure. 10) Cerebral bleeding or history of cerebral bleeding. 11) Allergic to latex. 12) Pregnancy (assessed by urine test) or breastfeeding. 13) Claustrophobia. 14) Smoking or using tobacco including snuff. 15) Inability to maintain exercise routine and dietary pattern during the study.

16) Consumption of more than 6 cups of coffee/caffeine-containing beverages per day.

17) Professional athlete. 18) Dominant left-hand. 19) Medical implant (e.g., pacemaker). 20) Aneurysm clips in the head. 21) Shunts in the head. 22) Grenade-splinter or metal-splinter in the body (e.g., eyes). 23) Metal or electrodes in the body (e.g., temp-catheter, aorta stent, cochlea implant).

24) Comprehensive tooth-implants or prothesis. 25) Operated in the head. 26) Operated in the heart. 27) Swallowed a video-capsule. 28) Non-corrected astigmatism. 29) Regular intake of systemic corticosteroids and anti-inflammatory medication (including NSAIDs) during the last three months.

30) Visual defect without possibility to use lenses during MRI scanning. 31) Known allergy to milk or soy. 32) Any other reason the investigator feels the subject is not suitable for participation in the study.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: BASIC_SCIENCE
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: CROSSOVER
  • Masking: DOUBLE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
PLACEBO_COMPARATOR: Placebo
All study participants will receive the study product and the placebo in a randomized, double-blind crossover fashion. Probiotic and placebo products have similar appearance and taste.
Placebo intervention.
EXPERIMENTAL: Probiotic
All study participants will receive the study product and the placebo in a randomized, double-blind crossover fashion. Probiotic and placebo products have similar appearance and taste.
The Probiotic Formula is commercially available and contains a combination of 3 probiotic strains in addition to other nutrients. The total daily amount of probiotic strain in the product will be no less than 3 billion colony-forming units (CFU) per 3 g powder sachet.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Change in brain response to validated emotional challenge task (EAT) during functional brain imaging
Time Frame: Comparing week 4 and 12
Comparing week 4 and 12

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Change in brain response to a cognitive challenge task (MIST) during functional brain imaging
Time Frame: Comparing week 4 and 12
Comparing week 4 and 12

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in physical activity assessed by an actigraphy watch (actiwatch)
Time Frame: Comparing the change in week 0 compared to 4, and 8 compared to 12 (before and in the end of the two intervention periods)
Actigraph data regarding physical activity
Comparing the change in week 0 compared to 4, and 8 compared to 12 (before and in the end of the two intervention periods)
Change in sleep quality assessed by an actigraphy watch (actiwatch)
Time Frame: Comparing the change in week 0 compared to 4, and 8 compared to 12 (before and in the end of the two intervention periods)
Actigraph data regarding sleep quality
Comparing the change in week 0 compared to 4, and 8 compared to 12 (before and in the end of the two intervention periods)
Change in daily stress levels assessed by an actigraphy watch (actiwatch)
Time Frame: Comparing the change in week 0 compared to 4, and 8 compared to 12 (before and in the end of the two intervention periods)
Actigraph data regarding daily stress levels
Comparing the change in week 0 compared to 4, and 8 compared to 12 (before and in the end of the two intervention periods)
Autonomous Nervous System (ANS) Activity, Biopac
Time Frame: Comparing the change in week 0 compared to 4, and 8 compared to 12 (before and in the end of the two intervention periods)
ANS activity is measures during stressful tasks.
Comparing the change in week 0 compared to 4, and 8 compared to 12 (before and in the end of the two intervention periods)
Stroop test
Time Frame: Comparing the change in week 0 compared to 4, and 8 compared to 12 (before and in the end of the two intervention periods)
The Stroop test is performed for stress induction
Comparing the change in week 0 compared to 4, and 8 compared to 12 (before and in the end of the two intervention periods)
HADS (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale)
Time Frame: Measured weekly, week 1-12
Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, min score 0, max score 3, total score max 42, subscale anxiety max 21, subscale depression max 21
Measured weekly, week 1-12
STAI (State and Trait Anxiety Inventory for Adults)
Time Frame: Measured weekly, week 1-12
State and Trait Anxiety Inventory for Adults
Measured weekly, week 1-12
PSS (Perceived Stress Scale)
Time Frame: Measured weekly, week 1-12
Perceived Stress Scale, min score 0, max score 40
Measured weekly, week 1-12
Euro-QoL
Time Frame: Measured weekly, week 1-12
Euro Qol- Health-related Quality of Life 5Q-5D-5L, min score 0, max score 20, subscale 0-100
Measured weekly, week 1-12
Karolinska Sleep Diary (KSD)
Time Frame: Measured daily, week 1-4 and 8-12
KSD measures sleep quality in the morning
Measured daily, week 1-4 and 8-12
Karolinska Diary of Workload (KDW)
Time Frame: Measured daily, week 1-4 and 8-12
KDW measures workload daily in the evening
Measured daily, week 1-4 and 8-12
Cortisol levels during fMRI tasks (Saliva)
Time Frame: Comparing week 4 and 12
Saliva samples are collected during fMRI to assess cortisol levels
Comparing week 4 and 12
Cortisol awakening rhythm (saliva)
Time Frame: Comparing the change in week 0 compared to 4, and 8 compared to 12 (before and in the end of the two intervention periods)
Saliva samples are collected at home (3 days á 5 samples) to assess cortisol levels
Comparing the change in week 0 compared to 4, and 8 compared to 12 (before and in the end of the two intervention periods)
Faecal samples
Time Frame: Comparing the change in week 0 compared to 4, and 8 compared to 12 (before and in the end of the two intervention periods)
Faecal samples will be analyzed for quantitative and qualitative microbial composition by 16S rRNA-based next generation sequencing (NGS)
Comparing the change in week 0 compared to 4, and 8 compared to 12 (before and in the end of the two intervention periods)
Change in inflammatory markers
Time Frame: Comparing the change in week 0 compared to 4, and 8 compared to 12 (before and in the end of the two intervention periods)
Blood samples will be collected after each intervention period to assess inflammatory markers using Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assays (ELISA)s
Comparing the change in week 0 compared to 4, and 8 compared to 12 (before and in the end of the two intervention periods)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Collaborators

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Robert Brummer, Prof, Örebro University, Sweden

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

January 22, 2018

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

June 16, 2018

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

June 16, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 8, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 30, 2018

First Posted (ACTUAL)

August 6, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

August 6, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 30, 2018

Last Verified

July 1, 2018

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 2017/398

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Probiotics

Clinical Trials on Placebo

3
Subscribe