Pregabalin add-on for Neuropathic Pain in Cervical Myelopathy

August 1, 2018 updated by: Chun Kee Chung, Seoul National University Hospital

Comparison of Effectiveness of Opioid Only and Pregabalin add-on for the Treatment of Neuropathic Pain in Cervical Myelopathy Patients

There is no information on the effect of pregabalin in patients with neuropathic pain in cervical myelopathy under routine clinical practice.

The investigators will conduct this prospective, randomized trial to determine the efficacy of pregabalin for neuropathic pain in cervical myelopathic patients in order to validate or refute this popular practice. The primary aim of this study was to compare Leeds assessment of neuropathic symptoms and signs scale (LANSS) scores of neuropathic pain in cervical myelopathy patients.

Study Overview

Status

Unknown

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Neuropathic pain is a well-recognized clinical entity. It is defined as pain caused by the lesion or dysfunction of the peripheral or central nervous system, and it can be diagnosed by well-established clinical criteria. Neuropathic pain is caused by lesions or dysfunction of the nervous system and is initiated by several cellular and molecular mechanisms. Compression of neural and neurovascular structures may result in neuropathic pain. Although a number of therapies are available for neuropathic pain, including antidepressants, tramadol, opioids, and different antiepileptic drugs, the results of a recent systematic review suggest that, in view of their balance between efficacy and tolerability, pregabalin can be regarded as first line treatments for peripheral pain with a neuropathic component.

Pregabalin is one of antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) that have been studied in the treatment of a wide variety of disorders, such as neuropathic pain, epilepsy, spasticity, and anxiety. The use of AEDs in the treatment of neuropathic pain is based on a number of similarities in the pathophysiologic and biochemical mechanisms underlying neuropathic pain and epilepsy. Its use for the treatment of several neuropathic pain syndromes is common, and it is approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for the treatment of diabetic neuropathy, post-herpetic neuralgia, fibromyalgia and spinal cord injury, a model of central neuropathic pain. The off-label use of pregabalin for the various pain syndromes in general, and for neuropathic pain in particular, is ubiquitous. However, minimal support for this practice exists in the literature and its cost is perhaps exorbitant. There is no information on the effect of pregabalin in patients with neuropathic pain in cervical myelopathy under routine clinical practice.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

60

Phase

  • Phase 1

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Seoul, Korea, Republic of, 110-744
        • Recruiting
        • Seoul National University Hospital
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 80 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. between the ages of 18 to 80 years
  2. Among patients with cervical myelopathy, patients with neuropathic pain (LANSS pain scale ≥ 12)
  3. Completing 8-week drug trial

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Current or prior gabapentin or pregabalin use
  2. Chronic use of narcotic pain medications
  3. Chronic depression or the use of anti-depressants
  4. History of addiction and/or substance abuse
  5. Presence of significant motor deficits, and /or bowel and/or bladder dysfunction
  6. Known renal insufciency, diabetes, congestive heart failure, cardiac conduction abnormalities, and thrombocytopenia

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Placebo Comparator: opioid only
Patients in the opioid group received the only opioid (5mg of oxycodone three times a day) for 8 weeks.
Patients in the opioid group received the only opioid (5mg of oxycodone three times a day) for 8 weeks.
Other Names:
  • IRcordon
Experimental: pregabalin add-on
Patients in the pregabalin add-on group received 75mg of pregabalin twice a day for the first week (150 mg/day) and 150mg of pregabalin twice a day (300 mg/day) for the second week and 300mg of pregabalin twice a day (600mg/day) for subsequent 6 weeks.
Patients in the opioid group received the only opioid (5mg of oxycodone three times a day) for 8 weeks.
Other Names:
  • IRcordon
Patients in the pregabalin add-on group received 75mg of pregabalin twice a day for the first week (150 mg/day) and 150mg of pregabalin twice a day (300 mg/day) for the second week and 300mg of pregabalin twice a day (600mg/day) for subsequent 6 weeks.
Other Names:
  • Lyrica

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Leeds assessment of neuropathic symptoms and signs (LANSS) and visual analogue scale (VAS)
Time Frame: 2 months

The LANSS pain scales are used globally to screen for the presence of pain of neuropathic origin because they have high sensitivity and specificity compared with other available tools. It rages from 0 to 24. The LANSS scores ≧12 suggest the presence of neuropathic pain.

The visual analogue scale or visual analog scale (VAS) is a psychometric response scale which can be used in questionnaires. It is a measurement instrument for subjective characteristics or attitudes that cannot be directly measured. When responding to a VAS item, respondents specify their level of agreement to a statement by indicating a position along a continuous line between two end-points. It ranges from 0 to 10 (0 means no pain, 10 means worst pain.

2 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
neck disability index (NDI) and EuroQol- 5 Dimension (EQ-5D)
Time Frame: 2 months

The NDI is a modification of the Oswestry Low Back Pain Disability Index. It is a patient-completed, condition-specific functional status questionnaire with 10 items including pain, personal care, lifting, reading, headaches, concentration, work, driving, sleeping and recreation. It ranges from 0 to 45 (0 means no disability, 45 means severe disability).

The EQ-5D is a generic, self-completed, easy-to-use questionnaire. The EQ-5D comprises five dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression. Rated level can be coded as a number 1, 2, or 3, which indicates having no problems for 1, having some problems for 2, and having extreme problems for 3. As a result, a person's health status can be defined by a 5-digit number, ranging from 11111 (having no problems in all dimensions) to 33333 (having extreme problems in all dimensions). There are potentially 243 (=35) different health states.

2 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Chun Kee Chung, MD, PhD, Seoul National University Hospital

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

November 26, 2016

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

December 31, 2019

Study Completion (Anticipated)

December 31, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 9, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 1, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

August 7, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

August 7, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 1, 2018

Last Verified

August 1, 2018

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe