Evaluation of Diaphragm Movement After an Interscalene Block

November 8, 2022 updated by: University of Minnesota
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the movement of the diaphragm after an interscalene block with liposome bupivacaine (LB) compared to interscalene block (IB) with bupivacaine. This study will evaluate if there is a possible prolonged phrenic nerve paralysis when using liposome bupivacaine in an interscalene block, using ultrasound.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Detailed Description

This study will be run concurrently with two other studies comparing bupivacaine to Liposomal Bupivacaine in shoulder surgeries. We will use already randomized patients for our randomization process. For this study in particular we will use an ultrasound machine to scan the diaphragm of any patient who had an Interscalene Block for Total Shoulder Arthroplasy or Rotator Cuff Repair. Patients are to be scanned in an upright sitting position and scanned from a low intercostal or subcostal approach using the liver or spleen as an acoustic window. M Mode will be applied and the range of diaphragmatic movement from the resting expiratory position to deep inspiration (sigh test) will be recorded as was the range of diaphragmatic movement from resting expiratory position when quickly inspiring through the nose (sniff test). The blocks will be done regardless of the study as they are standard of care for pain control. The only intervention is ultrasound examination of the patient's diaphragm at baseline, 3 hours post block in recovery room and on post-operative day 1, and basic spirometry to record FEV1 and FVC via a portable spirometer at the same time points. If patients did stay in hospital on postoperative day 2 we would also evaluate their diaphragm function.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

26

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Minnesota
      • Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States, 55455
        • Univeristy of Minnesota

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • All patients age 18 years and older who are scheduled for shoulder surgery with interscalene block and remain in the hospital for more than 24 hours that are being randomized into a bupivacaine versus liposomal bupivacaine interscalene block study.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Non English speaking patients.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: SCREENING
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: TRIPLE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
EXPERIMENTAL: liposomal bupivacaine
These patients receive an interscalene block with liposomal bupivacaine.
Experimental
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: bupivacaine
These patients receive an interscalene block with bupivacaine.
Active comparator

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Diaphragm Excursion With Sigh
Time Frame: change from baseline to 24 hours after block
Evaluation of diaphragm excursion (movement in cm) from rest to sigh in a sitting position.
change from baseline to 24 hours after block

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Diaphragm Excursion With Quick Inspiratory Breath
Time Frame: change from baseline to 24 hours after block
Evaluation of diaphragm excursion (movement in cm) from rest to a quick inspiratory breath.
change from baseline to 24 hours after block
Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1)
Time Frame: change from baseline to 24 hours after block
Evaluation of FEV1 via spirometry.
change from baseline to 24 hours after block
Forced Vital Capacity (FVC)
Time Frame: change from baseline to 24 hours after block
Evaluation of FVC via spirometry.
change from baseline to 24 hours after block
FEV1/FVC
Time Frame: change from baseline to 24 hours after block
Evaluation of FEV1/FVC percent via spirometry.
change from baseline to 24 hours after block

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

August 1, 2018

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

June 3, 2020

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

June 3, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 20, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 15, 2018

First Posted (ACTUAL)

August 17, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

November 30, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 8, 2022

Last Verified

November 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

Yes

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

Yes

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe