Impact of Different Shoe Heel Heights on Spinal Configuration

July 24, 2019 updated by: HAhmed, Cairo University

Impact of Different Shoe Heel Heights on Spinal Configuration During Different Phases of Menstrual Cycle

90 healthy female subjects with regular menstrual cycle ,their ages ranged from 19-25 years,their BMI ranged from 18-25 will be participated in this study.

Formetric Raster Stereography will be used to assess spinal configuration while each participant wear shoes of different heel heights 2.5 cm (low),4.5 cm (moderate) and 7 cm (height) during early follicular and mid luteal phases of menstrual cycle.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

  • this study will be conducted on healthy females to investigate effect of different heel heights footwear on spine posture and pelvic position by using formetric 4 D analysis system which is a light-optical scanning method based on Video-Raster-Stereography (VRS). Accordingly, the system consists of a light projector which projects a line grid on the back of the patient which is recorded by an imaging unit. A computer software analyzes the line curvature that generates from it. the formetric provides comprehensive information about the whole body statics and posture in only one measuring process, e.g. spine curvature (lateral and frontal), vertebral rotation, and pelvic position.
  • There is generally no need for reflecting markers, because the anatomical fixed points Vertebra prominens (VP), Sacrum Point (SP), Dimple Left (DL) Dimple Right (DR) as well as the spinal center line and spinal rotation are automatically detected by the system. That allows a very time-saving and reliable examination procedure.
  • shoe characteristics: standard shoes will be used and designed to fit females in sizes ranging from 37-41 and different heel heights (2.5 cm low, 4,5 cm moderate and 7 cm high).
  • Descriptive statistics including mean and standard deviation will be applied for dependent variables and participant demographics. repeated measures analysis of variance will be implemented to detect the difference in dependent measures among three heel condition.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Anticipated)

90

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

19 years to 25 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

90 healthy females with regular menstrual cycle

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Their ages ranged from 19-25.
  • Their BMI ranged from 18-25
  • They wear high heeled shoes occasionally for less than 10 H/week or not at all
  • they are able to wear high heel without pain.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • any female with spinal deviation,previous spinal surgeries,leg length discrepancy or foot deformities
  • Joint stiffness, ankle sprain
  • any case with orthopedic or neurological problems
  • Females with irregular menstrual cycle

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
kyphotic angle
Time Frame: from 9/2018 to 6/2019
this the maximum angle measured between surface tangents of the upper inflection point in the vicinity of the vertebra prominence and the thoracic lumbar inflection point
from 9/2018 to 6/2019
Lordotic angle
Time Frame: from 9/2018 to 6/2019
this the maximum angle measured between surface tangents of the thoracic lumbar inflection point and lower lumbar-sacral inflection point
from 9/2018 to 6/2019
trunk imbalance
Time Frame: from 9/2018 to 6/2019
trunk imbalance is defined as the lateral deviation of the vertebra prominence from the mid line dimple
from 9/2018 to 6/2019
trunk inclination
Time Frame: from 9/2018 to 6/2019
trunk inclination refers to a difference in the height between vertebra prominence and dimple mid line based on a vertical plane (sagittal section)
from 9/2018 to 6/2019
pelvic tilting
Time Frame: from 9/2018 to 6/2019
pelvic tilt refers as the difference in the height of the lumbar dimple based on horizontal plane ( transverse section)
from 9/2018 to 6/2019
pelvic inclination
Time Frame: from 9/2018 to 6/2019
it is calculated as the mean torsion of the dimple left and dimple right surface normals
from 9/2018 to 6/2019

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Anticipated)

July 1, 2019

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

August 1, 2019

Study Completion (Anticipated)

September 1, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 2, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 26, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

September 28, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

July 25, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 24, 2019

Last Verified

November 1, 2018

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • P.T.REC/012/001884

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Impact of Different Heel Heights on Spinal Configuration

Clinical Trials on no intervention

3
Subscribe