Reducing Sedentary Behavior to Decrease Low Back Pain: Stand Back Study (StandBack)

February 20, 2019 updated by: Bethany Barone Gibbs, University of Pittsburgh
This study will test the effects of a sedentary behavior intervention on low back pain in working adults. The behavioral intervention will include the use of a sit-stand desk and a wrist-worn activity prompter that will notify participants when they have been sedentary for too long.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Detailed Description

Low back pain (LBP) is prevalent, debilitating and costly. Though exercise is a recommended treatment for LBP, outcomes are variable and adherence is often poor due to barriers such as time, sedentary jobs, and fear-avoidance of movement. Thus, the management of LBP must include a biobehavioral lifestyle treatment approach. Preliminary evidence suggests that prolonged sitting at work can exacerbate LBP, LBP is relieved shortly after prolonged sitting ends, and standing more at work can relieve pain. Thus, this proposal will examine an innovative intervention to decrease pain in patients with chronic LBP (cLBP) through a reduction in sedentary behavior. The target population will be University of Pittsburgh (UPitt) employees with cLBP who are inactive and sit at their desk for ≥20 hours/week. Over 6 months, individuals will be provided with a workstation that allows for standing while performing work duties, a wrist-worn activity device that vibrates after prolonged sedentariness, and a behavioral intervention including an initial orientation and monthly follow-up telephone contacts. This is a novel pain reduction approach that is easily incorporated into the workplace and targets a timeframe during which prolonged sitting is common. A unique aspect of the approach is that individuals with cLBP who avoid movement due to pain may especially benefit from this emerging strategy of more frequent, lifestyle activity facilitated by newly-available devices. The investigators hypothesize that this intervention will reduce pain intensity thereby leading to increased work productivity, decreased healthcare utilization, improved health-related quality of life, and improved physical function in LBP sufferers. If effective, this scalable intervention could be implemented broadly to enhance employee health.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

27

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Pennsylvania
      • Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States, 15261
        • University of Pittsburgh, Physical Activity and Weight Management Research Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

16 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Have chronic low back pain defined as a back pain problem that has persisted at least 3 months and has resulted in pain on at least half the days in the past 6 months
  2. Oswestry low back pain index >20% to ensure a moderate level of disability is present, thus minimizing a potential floor effect
  3. Currently perform deskwork at least 20 hours per week at a desk compatible with the sit-stand attachment
  4. Stable employment (at least 3 months at current job and plan to stay at current job for the next 6 months)
  5. Ability to obtain approval to install sit-stand workstation (i.e., from supervisor)
  6. Access to internet connection and email to complete assessment surveys

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Unable to provide informed consent
  2. Cardiovascular event in the last 6 months (e.g. heart attack, stoke, heart failure, revascularization procedure)
  3. Presence of a comorbid condition that would limit ability to reduce sedentary behavior (e.g. currently undergoing treatment for cancer)
  4. Back surgery in the past 3 months or planned in the next year
  5. Presence of a medical "red flag" for a serious spinal condition (cancer, compression fracture, signs or symptoms of root compression, infection)
  6. Inability to tolerate standing for any reason
  7. Currently using a sit-stand desk, standing desk, or wearable activity monitor
  8. Currently pregnant or planned pregnancy in the next 6 months
  9. Blood pressure >159/100 mmHg

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Intervention
These subjects will participate in a behavioral intervention that will focus on reducing sedentary behavior and improving self-management of pain. This will include an initial, in-person behavioral intervention and then monthly follow-up calls. In addition, subjects will receive a sit-stand desk attachment and a wrist-worn activity prompter to aid in sedentary behavior reduction.
Participants participated in monthly, individual counselling with a trained interventionist to decrease sedentary behavior and improve pain self-management. Participants were provided with a sit-stand desk attachment and a wrist worn activity prompter..
Placebo Comparator: Control
These subjects will receive no intervention.
No contact control

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Low Back Pain Disability
Time Frame: 6 months
Oswestry Disability Index. This measurements is reported as a % (range 1-100%) where a higher score indicates worse low back pain disability.
6 months
Usual Low Back Pain
Time Frame: 6 months
Pain rated by Visual Analog Scale (Usual Back Pain). This score ranges from 1-10 where a higher score indicates worse pain.
6 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Quality of Life (Self-reported)
Time Frame: 6 months
36-item Short Form Survey (SF-36). This validated survey collects information on quality of life, with scores ranging from 0-100, and where higher scores indicate higher quality of life.The General Health Score is reported.
6 months
Mood
Time Frame: 6 months
Profile of Mood States Questionnaire. Total mood disturbance score reported here. Higher scores indicate higher mood disturbance (range 0-200 points).
6 months
50-ft Walk Test
Time Frame: 6 months
Time to complete 50 ft. walk test (seconds) at usual pace. Lower time indicates better function.
6 months
Chair Stand Test
Time Frame: 6 months
Time to complete 5 sit-to-stand transitions (seconds). Lower time indicates better function.
6 months
Timed up and go Test
Time Frame: 6 months
Timed up and go test (seconds). A lower time indicates better function.
6 months
Unloaded Reach Test
Time Frame: 6 months
Distance on an unloaded reach test (cm). Greater distance indicates better function.
6 months
Presenteeism
Time Frame: 6 months
Stanford Presenteeism Scale. A higher score indicates higher presenteeism (range 6-30 points).
6 months
Work Productivity
Time Frame: 6 months
Health and Work Questionnaire. Higher total score indicates better work productivity (range 0-240 points).
6 months
Physical Activity
Time Frame: 6 months
Minutes per week of moderate-to-vigorous physical activity by self-report
6 months
Sedentary Behavior
Time Frame: 6 months
Self-reported hours per day
6 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

October 1, 2015

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2016

Study Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2016

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 13, 2015

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 4, 2015

First Posted (Estimate)

December 8, 2015

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 13, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 20, 2019

Last Verified

February 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • PRO15060576

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Chronic Low Back Pain

Clinical Trials on Intervention

3
Subscribe