Symptom-driven Referral for Evaluation of Chronic Thromboembolic Disease or Pulmonary Hypertension in Patients With Previous Acute Pulmonary Embolism

November 1, 2018 updated by: University of Aarhus

Aim: To investigate if a symptom driven referral for chronic thrombosis in the lungs after acute pulmonary embolism is better than the current approach.

Background: A number of patients with chronic thrombosis in the lungs after acute pulmonary embolism have dyspnea and reduced functional capacity without elevated pulmonary arterial pressure at rest (CTED). However, current guidelines for follow-up after acute pulmonary embolism will miss all patients with CTED, as referral for further examination is based on elevated pulmonary arterial pressure on echocardiography. Thus, the prevalence of CTED is unknown. The hypothesis is, that a symptom-driven referral of patients with previous acute pulmonary embolism is more sensitive in diagnosing CTED than the current approach.

Methods and materials: Patients diagnosed with acute pulmonary embolism in Region Midt (approx. 350 per year) will be screened for non-recovery or persistent pulmonary embolism related symptoms during their 3-6 months follow up at their local outpatient clinic. If the patient has persistent symptoms they will be referred to a scintigraphy. If CTED is suspected from the scintigraphy, the patient will be referred for full CTED work-up. The investigators expect to screen 300 patients for persistent symptoms with an expected study time of 3 years.

Study Overview

Status

Unknown

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

100

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 79 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Acute PE diagnosed by CT or V/Q-scan within the last year.
  • Non-recovery or persistent PE related symptoms assessed by a MRC breathlessness score or WHO functional class.
  • Age >= 18 and < 80

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Contraindications or unable to perform 6 minutes walk distance (6MWD) and/or cardiopulmonary exercise test.
  • Contraindications to CT pulmonary angiography.
  • Congestive heart failure (LVEF <40%).
  • COPD or restrictive lung disease, severe or worse (FEV1 <50% and >=1 exacerbation causing hospital admission per year (GOLD grade 3 and 4 class C and D)).
  • Lactating or pregnant.
  • Unable or unwilling to provide written informed consent.
  • Paroxysmal or persistent atrial fibrillation.
  • Other known cause of PE related symptoms.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Other: CTEPH/CTED work-up
Patients diagnosed with acute pulmonary embolism (PE) in Region Midt (approx. 350 per year) will be screened for non-recovery or persistent PE related symptoms during their 3-6 months follow up at their local outpatient clinic. If the patient has persistent symptoms they will be referred to a V/Q-scan. If a V/Q mismatch is present, the patient will be referred to a full work-up for CTEPH/CTED.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Prevalence of CTED
Time Frame: 3 years
3 years

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Diagnostic accuracy of dual energy CT perfusion and pulmonary angiography.
Time Frame: 3 years
Sensibility, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value
3 years

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Collaborators

Investigators

  • Study Chair: Asger Andersen, MD, PhD, Aarhus University Hospital

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Anticipated)

February 1, 2019

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

November 1, 2022

Study Completion (Anticipated)

November 1, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 1, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 1, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

November 2, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

November 2, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 1, 2018

Last Verified

October 1, 2018

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Chronic Thromboembolic Pulmonary Disease

Clinical Trials on CTEPH/CTED work-up

3
Subscribe