Identifying the Effect and Working Mechanisms of MyPlan 2.0 in Older Adults

December 3, 2021 updated by: University Ghent

A Randomized Controlled Trial to Identify the Effect and the Working Mechanisms of MyPlan 2.0, a Self-regulation-based e- and mHealth Intervention Targeting Physical Activity and Sedentary Behaviour, in Older Adults

The aim of this study is to investigate whether and how 'MyPlan 2.0' helps older adults to be more physically active or less sedentary. Two groups will be created, an intervention group and a waiting-list control group.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

The aim of this study is to investigate whether and how 'MyPlan 2.0' helps older adults to be more physically active or less sedentary. Two groups will be created, an intervention group and a waiting-list control group. Both groups will be tested during three testing waves: pretest, posttest and follow-up test. Only the intervention group will be given acces to 'MyPlan 2.0'.

'MyPlan 2.0' consists of a website and mobile application targeting physical activity and sedentary behaviour. The intervention has a duration of five weeks.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

63

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Ghent, Belgium, 9000
        • Department of Movement and Sports Sciences

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

50 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Have access to internet
  • Being computer literate

Exclusion Criteria:

  • non Dutch speaking

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Intervention group
Participants will receive the e- and mHealth intervention 'MyPlan 2.0'.
MyPlan 2.0 consists of five sessions. During these five sessions the following behaviour change techniques are used to motivate users to be more physically active or to sit less: exploring risk perceptions and perceived benefits, exploring social support, providing feedback, action planning, coping planning and monitoring.
Experimental: Waiting List control group
Participants will not receive the e- and mHealth intervention 'MyPlan 2.0', but will be given access to the intervention after all testing phases.
Waiting List control group

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in objective total, light and moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (PA)
Time Frame: Pretest, posttest (6 weeks) and follow-up (6 months)
Change in amount of total, light and moderate-to-vigorous physical activity, measured via accelerometers
Pretest, posttest (6 weeks) and follow-up (6 months)
Change in objective sedentary behaviour
Time Frame: Pretest, posttest (6 weeks) and follow-up (6 months)
Change in amount of total sitting time, measured via accelerometers
Pretest, posttest (6 weeks) and follow-up (6 months)
Change in self-reported total, moderate and moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (PA) as well as total work-related, transport-related, household-related and leisure time PA.
Time Frame: Pretest, posttest (6 weeks) and follow-up (6 months)
Change in amount of total, light and moderate-to-vigorous PA well as total work-related, transport-related, household-related and leisure time PA will be measured via the International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ). The IPAQ measures physical activity in four domains: work, transport, household and leisure time. Higher scores indicate higher levels of physical activity. For each scale the minimum value is 0. We will use the method described by Dubuy et al. (2013) to truncate the data.
Pretest, posttest (6 weeks) and follow-up (6 months)
Change in self-reported sedentary behaviour
Time Frame: Pretest, posttest (6 weeks) and follow-up (6 months)
Change in amount of total sitting time, measured via the LASA sedentary behaviour self-report questionnaire. The total score is calculated by summing all 10 items.The minimum value is 0 and the maximum value is 24 hours. However, data will be truncated at 16 hours.
Pretest, posttest (6 weeks) and follow-up (6 months)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in self-efficacy
Time Frame: Pretest, after week 1, after week 2, after week 3, after week 4, posttest (6 weeks), and follow-up (6 months)
Change in amount of self-efficacy to change behaviour, measured via 5 validated items (questionnaire). These items were created by the involved research groups. For each item, the scale ranges from 1 to 10. The average score on the five items will be considered the final score.
Pretest, after week 1, after week 2, after week 3, after week 4, posttest (6 weeks), and follow-up (6 months)
Change in outcome expectancies
Time Frame: Pretest, after week 1, after week 2, after week 3, after week 4, posttest (6 weeks), and follow-up (6 months
Outcome expectancies regarding the behaviour change, measured via 5 validated items (questionnaire). These items were created by the involved research groups. For each item, the scale ranges from 1 to 10. The average score on the five items will be considered the final score.
Pretest, after week 1, after week 2, after week 3, after week 4, posttest (6 weeks), and follow-up (6 months
Change in risk perception
Time Frame: Pretest, after week 1, after week 2, after week 3, after week 4, posttest (6 weeks), and follow-up (6 months
Risk perception about the behaviour, measured via 4 validated items (questionnaire). These items were created by the involved research groups. For each item, the scale ranges from 1 to 10. The average score on the four items will be considered the final score
Pretest, after week 1, after week 2, after week 3, after week 4, posttest (6 weeks), and follow-up (6 months
Change in intention
Time Frame: Pretest, after week 1, after week 2, after week 3, after week 4, posttest (6 weeks), and follow-up (6 months
Amount of intention to change the behaviour, measured via 3 validated items (questionnaire). These items were created by the involved research groups. For each item, the scale ranges from 1 to 10. The average score on the three items will be considered the final score.
Pretest, after week 1, after week 2, after week 3, after week 4, posttest (6 weeks), and follow-up (6 months
Change in action planning
Time Frame: Pretest, after week 1, after week 2, after week 3, after week 4, posttest (6 weeks), and follow-up (6 months
Amount of action planning for behaviour change, measured via 3 validated items (questionnaire). These items were created by the involved research groups. For each item, the scale ranges from 1 to 10. The average score on the three items will be considered the final score.
Pretest, after week 1, after week 2, after week 3, after week 4, posttest (6 weeks), and follow-up (6 months
Change in coping planning
Time Frame: Pretest, after week 1, after week 2, after week 3, after week 4, posttest (6 weeks), and follow-up (6 months
Amount of coping planning for behaviour change, measured via 3 validated items (questionnaire). These items were created by the involved research groups. For each item, the scale ranges from 1 to 10. The average score on the three items will be considered the final score.
Pretest, after week 1, after week 2, after week 3, after week 4, posttest (6 weeks), and follow-up (6 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Ilse De Bourdeaudhuij, University Ghent
  • Principal Investigator: Geert Crombez, University Ghent

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 15, 2018

Primary Completion (Actual)

August 15, 2018

Study Completion (Actual)

April 15, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 7, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 9, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

January 10, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

December 6, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 3, 2021

Last Verified

December 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • MyPlan2.0_older_adults_50

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Overweight

Clinical Trials on MyPlan 2.0

Subscribe