Effect of Intermittent Theta Burst Stimulation (iTBS) for Alleviating Symptoms of Schizophrenia Patients

April 14, 2021 updated by: WANG KAI
To investigate the treatment effect of intermittent theta-burst transcranial magnetic stimulation on symptomatic relief of schizophrenia patients, and the underlying neural mechanism by functional MRI and the resting electroencephalogram

Study Overview

Detailed Description

All patients underwent a medical evaluation that included physical examination and routine laboratory studies before and after intermittent theta-burst transcranial magnetic stimulation (iTBS) treatment. Patients were randomly allocated to iTBS group and the sham group by coin toss. There are about 30 patients in each group.The decision to enroll a patient was always made prior to randomization. Patients were studied using a double-blind design. Study participants, clinical raters, and all personnel responsible for the clinical care of the patient remained masked to allocated condition and allocation parameters. Only iTBS administrators had access to the randomization list; they had minimal contact with the patients, and no role in assessing the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS). Each patient would be treated for continuous 14 days by iTBS.Before the iTBS treatment, PANSS and Clinical Global Impression-severity of illness (CGI-SI) at baseline were obtained by a trained investigator to assess baseline severity of their symptoms. Scale for the Assessment of Negative Symptoms (SANS) and Scale for Assessment of Positive Symptoms (SAPS) were respectively supplemented to evaluate the severity of symptoms in different dimensions,.The patients had receiving a battery measure of neuropsychological tests (standardized tests to investigate their cognitive problems, anxiety and depressive symptoms in daily life), magnetic resonance imaging scan in multimodalities, electroencephalography (EEG), event-related potentials during stop signal test and Iowa-gambling test record. Other behavioral tests including intertemporal decision,spatial n-back test record.

After the last treatment, the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale were obtained, as well as the Global Index of Safety to assess adverse events of the treatment. Patients were instructed to focus their answers on the past 14 days. The patients had also receiving a battery measure of neuropsychological tests, magnetic resonance imaging scan in multimodalities, and EEG record.Clinical Global Impression-global improvement (CGI-GI), Clinical Global Impression-efficacy index (CGI-EI) were evaluated at the end of treatment.

40-60 days after the last treatment, participants were interviewed to obtain the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale,SAPS,SANS and HAMA,HAMD. They were instructed to focus their answers on the past week. Additionally, they were also asked to assess the battery of neuropsychological tests, and have magnetic resonance imaging scan in multimodalities, and EEG record. Afterwards, they were unblinded by the study coordinator.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

60

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Anhui
      • Hefei, Anhui, China, 230032
        • Anhui Medical University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 52 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients met diagnostic criteria for schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder using the Structural Clinical Interview for Diagnostic and Statistical Manual Diploma in Social Medicine (DSM)-IV (SCID, Version 2.0).
  • Patients remain their psychotropic medication at steady dosages for at least 4 weeks prior to study entry and for the duration of the trial.
  • Verbal intelligence quotient > 85 as measured by using a Chinese version of the National Adult Reading Test.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • History of significant head trauma or neurological disorders
  • Alcohol or drug abuse Focal brain lesions on T1- or T2-weighted fluid-attenuated inversion-recovery magnetic resonance images
  • a prior history of a seizure not induced by drug withdrawal,first degree relative with epilepsy, significant neurological illness or head trauma, endocrine disease, such as thyroid disease, significant unstable medical condition, recent aggression or other forms of behavioral dyscontrol
  • left-handedness, pregnancy
  • estimated intelligence quotient<80
  • current alcohol or drug abuse
  • inability to provide informed consent.
  • Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale or the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale score > 14

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Real Stimulation
Real Stimulation: active transcranial magnetic stimulation(Intermittent Theta Burst Stimulation).Participants will receive active TMS once daily for two weeks

The stimulations were performed by MagStim Rapid2. Participants in active comparator will receive active transcranial magnetic stimulation(Real Stimulation) daily for two weeks.

Participants in sham comparator will receive no stimulation(Sham Stimulation) daily for two weeks

Placebo Comparator: Sham Stimulation
Sham Stimulation:no stimulation.Participants will receive sham TMS once daily for two weeks

The stimulations were performed by MagStim Rapid2. Participants in active comparator will receive active transcranial magnetic stimulation(Real Stimulation) daily for two weeks.

Participants in sham comparator will receive no stimulation(Sham Stimulation) daily for two weeks

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Positive And Negative Syndrome Scale(PANSS)
Time Frame: Baseline and 2 weeks post-treatment,and follow-up
The improvment in PANSS scores will constitute the major research outcome measure used to assess response to rTMS,reflecting the symptom improvment in patients
Baseline and 2 weeks post-treatment,and follow-up

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Scale for the Assessment of Positive Symptoms (SAPS)
Time Frame: Baseline and 2 weeks post-treatment and follow-up
The improvment in SAPS scores will constitute the major research outcome, and specifically reflect the degree of improvement in patients' positive symptoms
Baseline and 2 weeks post-treatment and follow-up
Scale for the Assessment of Negative Symptoms (SANS)
Time Frame: Baseline and 2 weeks post-treatment and follow-up
The improvment in SANS scores will constitute the major research outcome, and specifically reflect the degree of improvement in patients' negative symptoms
Baseline and 2 weeks post-treatment and follow-up
Functional connectivity change of transcranial magnetic stimulation(iTBS and sham)
Time Frame: Baseline and 2 weeks post-treatment
Functional MRI measures: the functional connectivity between stimulated target and the whole brain areas
Baseline and 2 weeks post-treatment
EEG change of transcranial magnetic stimulation(iTBS and sham)
Time Frame: Baseline and 2 weeks post-treatment
EEG measures: brain areas wave change of stimulation(iTBS and sham)
Baseline and 2 weeks post-treatment
Intertemporal decision test
Time Frame: Baseline and 2 weeks post-treatment
Intertemporal decision test is associated with the function of left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex
Baseline and 2 weeks post-treatment
Spatial n-back test
Time Frame: Baseline and 2 weeks post-treatment
Spatial n-back test will reflect the prefrontal function
Baseline and 2 weeks post-treatment
Multidimensional Empathy Test
Time Frame: Baseline and 2 weeks post-treatment
Multidimensional empathy Test is associated with the function of left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex
Baseline and 2 weeks post-treatment

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

May 21, 2017

Primary Completion (Actual)

July 9, 2020

Study Completion (Actual)

March 30, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 3, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 8, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

March 11, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 15, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 14, 2021

Last Verified

April 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • ahmu-sjnk-scz

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Schizophrenia

Clinical Trials on transcranial magnetic stimulation

3
Subscribe