- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT03880773
Comparison Between Two Methods of Pancreatic Transection in Distal Pancreatectomy (TRUDY)
Tri Stapler vs. Ultrasonic Scalpel in Distal Pancreatectomy
Several systematic reviews have investigated the management of the pancreatic stump in order to reduce the postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) rate after distal pancreatectomy (DP). The appropriate closure technique of the pancreatic stump is still debated. There is no published experience about the comparison of the Endo GIA Reinforced Reload with Tri-Staple Technology (TS) versus Harmonic Focus (US) after distal pancreatectomy (DP) regarding the reduction of POPF.
The investigators want to compare the incidence of clinically-relevant POPF (CR-POPF) after DP, depending upon the transection technique (TS versus US).
This is a randomized controlled, multicenter, patient-blinded, superiority trial. This protocol was designed according to the SPIRIT guidelines.
Two groups of 76 patients (152 in total) with an indication for elective minimally invasive or open DP for a lesion of the body-tail of the pancreas. The two techniques analyzed are Endo GIA Reinforced Reload with Tri-Staple Technology (TS) and Harmonic Focus (US) as control.
The primary endpoint is to evaluate the incidence of CR-POPF rate after DP. Secondary endpoints are intraoperative outcomes (blood loss, operative time and conversion of the minimally invasive procedure), postoperative outcomes (complications rate; hospitalization parameters to 90 days; mortality) and treatment costs.
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Enrollment (Anticipated)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
-
Verona, Italy, 37134
- Recruiting
- Ospedale Policlinico GB Rossi
-
Principal Investigator:
- Claudio Bassi, MD
-
Contact:
- Luca Landoni, MD
- Phone Number: 0039 0458126254
- Email: luca.landoni@aovr.veneto.it
-
Principal Investigator:
- Luca Landoni, MD
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Scheduled for elective DP via a minimally invasive (laparoscopic or robotic) or open technique, either preserving the spleen or with splenectomy, depending on the diagnosis/nature of the tumor
- ASA score < 4
- Ability of the subject to understand character and individual consequences of the clinical trial
- Written informed consent
Exclusion Criteria:
- Pancreas thickness >17mm measured at the intraoperative ultrasound at the pancreatic transection level
- Metastatic disease
- Kidney or adrenal gland resection
- Arterial resection (celiac axis, superior mesenteric artery, hepatic artery)
- Intestinal resections and anastomoses or stoma
- Acute necrotizing and chronic pancreatitis
- Immune suppressed patients
- Pregnant women
- Patients with contraindications for distal pancreatectomy
- Impaired mental state or language problems
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Single
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Stapler
|
for transection of the pancreas and pancreatic stump treatment
|
|
Active Comparator: ultrasonic shears
|
for transection of the pancreas and pancreatic stump treatment
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Rate of Pancreatic fistula
Time Frame: 90 days
|
pancreatic fistula according to International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery (ISGPS) 2017 definition
|
90 days
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Operative time
Time Frame: intra-operatively
|
intra-operatively
|
|
|
Rate of postoperative overall and specific complications
Time Frame: 30 days, 90 days
|
abdominal collections, delayed gastric emptying, hemorrhage, sepsis, wound infections
|
30 days, 90 days
|
|
Rate of re-operations or percutaneous drainage
Time Frame: 30 days, 90 days
|
re-operations rate or percutaneous drainage rate
|
30 days, 90 days
|
|
Cost-analysis
Time Frame: 90 days
|
intra and post-operative costs
|
90 days
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Kleeff J, Diener MK, Z'graggen K, Hinz U, Wagner M, Bachmann J, Zehetner J, Muller MW, Friess H, Buchler MW. Distal pancreatectomy: risk factors for surgical failure in 302 consecutive cases. Ann Surg. 2007 Apr;245(4):573-82. doi: 10.1097/01.sla.0000251438.43135.fb.
- Knaebel HP, Diener MK, Wente MN, Buchler MW, Seiler CM. Systematic review and meta-analysis of technique for closure of the pancreatic remnant after distal pancreatectomy. Br J Surg. 2005 May;92(5):539-46. doi: 10.1002/bjs.5000.
- Ban D, Shimada K, Konishi M, Saiura A, Hashimoto M, Uesaka K. Stapler and nonstapler closure of the pancreatic remnant after distal pancreatectomy: multicenter retrospective analysis of 388 patients. World J Surg. 2012 Aug;36(8):1866-73. doi: 10.1007/s00268-012-1595-z.
- Suzuki Y, Fujino Y, Tanioka Y, Hori Y, Ueda T, Takeyama Y, Tominaga M, Ku Y, Yamamoto YM, Kuroda Y. Randomized clinical trial of ultrasonic dissector or conventional division in distal pancreatectomy for non-fibrotic pancreas. Br J Surg. 1999 May;86(5):608-11. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2168.1999.01120.x.
- Diener MK, Seiler CM, Rossion I, Kleeff J, Glanemann M, Butturini G, Tomazic A, Bruns CJ, Busch OR, Farkas S, Belyaev O, Neoptolemos JP, Halloran C, Keck T, Niedergethmann M, Gellert K, Witzigmann H, Kollmar O, Langer P, Steger U, Neudecker J, Berrevoet F, Ganzera S, Heiss MM, Luntz SP, Bruckner T, Kieser M, Buchler MW. Efficacy of stapler versus hand-sewn closure after distal pancreatectomy (DISPACT): a randomised, controlled multicentre trial. Lancet. 2011 Apr 30;377(9776):1514-22. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)60237-7.
- Zhang H, Zhu F, Shen M, Tian R, Shi CJ, Wang X, Jiang JX, Hu J, Wang M, Qin RY. Systematic review and meta-analysis comparing three techniques for pancreatic remnant closure following distal pancreatectomy. Br J Surg. 2015 Jan;102(1):4-15. doi: 10.1002/bjs.9653. Epub 2014 Nov 12.
- Kim H, Jang JY, Son D, Lee S, Han Y, Shin YC, Kim JR, Kwon W, Kim SW. Optimal stapler cartridge selection according to the thickness of the pancreas in distal pancreatectomy. Medicine (Baltimore). 2016 Aug;95(35):e4441. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000004441.
- Peng YP, Zhu XL, Yin LD, Zhu Y, Wei JS, Wu JL, Miao Y. Risk factors of postoperative pancreatic fistula in patients after distal pancreatectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Sci Rep. 2017 Mar 15;7(1):185. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-00311-8.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Anticipated)
Study Completion (Anticipated)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- TRUDY
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Pancreatic Fistula
-
Peking Union Medical College HospitalRecruiting
-
Changzhou Second People's Hospital affiliated with...RecruitingPostoperative Pancreatic FistulaChina
-
Rigshospitalet, DenmarkCompletedFistula PancreaticDenmark
-
Junjie XiongRecruitingPancreaticoduodenectomy | Postoperative Pancreatic FistulaChina
-
Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria AragónCompletedPancreas Disease | Fistula PancreaticSpain
-
Mansoura UniversityCompletedPancreatic Fistula After PancreaticoduodenectomyEgypt
-
Wuhan Union Hospital, ChinaEnrolling by invitationDistal Pancreatectomy | Postoperative Pancreatic FistulaChina
-
Tokai UniversityEnrolling by invitationPostoperative Pancreatic Fistula Post-pancreatoduodenectomyJapan
-
Technische Universität DresdenGerman Cancer Research CenterRecruitingPeriampullary Cancer | Postoperative Pancreatic FistulaGermany
-
Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de ParisRecruitingDistal Pancreatectomy | Postoperative Pancreatic FistulaFrance
Clinical Trials on Stapler
-
Nanchong Central HospitalRecruitingPostoperative Complications | Operative Time | Hospital CostsChina
-
Nanchong Central HospitalPengan County People's Hospital; Nanbu Hospital of County Chinese Medicine; Langzhong... and other collaboratorsRecruitingPostoperative Complications | Gastric Cancer | Gastrostomy | Anastomotic LeakageChina
-
Orthopaedic Research FoundationOrthoIndyCompletedPain | Erythema | Drainage | BruisingUnited States
-
Scitech Produtos Medicos LtdaActive, not recruiting
-
Ezisurg Medical Co. Ltd.University Hospital, MontpellierCompletedGastroesophageal Reflux Disease (GERD)France
-
University of AlbertaCompleted
-
Ethicon Endo-SurgeryCompletedExcision of KidneyUnited States
-
Ethicon Endo-SurgeryCompletedNon Small Cell Lung CancerUnited States
-
Asian Institute of Gastroenterology, IndiaRecruiting
-
Zhejiang UniversityCompletedDistal Pancreatectomy | Postoperative Pancreatic FistulaChina