Eye Muscle Needle Electromyogram (EMu) Study (EMu)

A Data Collection and Analysis Pilot Study to Indicate Preliminary Characterisation of the Electromyogram Signal in Relation to Needle Position With Respect to the Extraocular Muscles, as Observed During Electromyogram Needle Guided Treatment of Strabismus in Adults

In some cases, strabismus, or squint, is treated with injections of Botulinum toxin (BTX) to temporarily relax the eye muscle responsible for causing the eye to be pulled to one side. Due to the deep location of the muscles, electromyogram (EMG) needle guidance is used to help ensure the toxin is delivered accurately. EMG needle guidance involves listening to the EMG signal from the tip of the delivery needle - when the needle is in the right place a sound akin to "rain on a tin roof" is heard and the BTX can be injected.

From previous research, clearly clinicians want to improve the technology of this procedure and increase the treatment efficacy and repeatability. After all, the current procedure is imprecise and subjective for what is a small target, with the eye muscles being around 2.5 mm to 4.7 mm in diameter. There may also be an increase in the likelihood of side effects such as droopy eyelids when the toxin spreads beyond the target muscle.

There is a strong need for new knowledge to improve EMG needle guidance in this context. It is hypothesised that the EMG signal could be cleaned and mined for information in real time during the procedure, thus providing the clinician with better information to guide the positioning of the needle before injecting. This pilot study will deliver the knowledge essential to indicate the feasibility of doing this. If feasible, this study will inform a full study with the aim of benefitting patients by allowing new technology to be developed to improve the treatment of strabismus with BTX.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

25

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Manchester, United Kingdom, M13 9WL
        • Manchester Royal Eye Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Patients with strabismus being treated with injections of Botulinum toxin.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

i. Adults undergoing planned, routine EMG needle guided BTX injection into either lateral or medial rectus muscle for the treatment of strabismus.

ii. Patients being treated by Mr Yagan.

Exclusion Criteria:

- Patients with Chronic progressive external ophthalmoplegia (CPEO) are excluded; a highly attenuated EMG signal is expected.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
α (Slope) Parameter of the Electromyogram (EMG) Signal Power Spectral Density (PSD) Plot as Needle Approaches Then Enters Muscle.
Time Frame: Approximately 5 minutes, i.e. immediately prior to needle insertion until Botulinum toxin (BTX) delivery and needle withdrawal

The continuous change in the EMG signal as the needle is (a) distal to, (b) approaches, and (c) enters, the target extraocular muscle.

Welch's periodogram estimator (Hamming window, 256-point FFT, 50% overlap) was applied to each of the three signal segments described above to obtain an estimate of the PSD of the signal. A robust linear model was fit to estimate the α (slope) parameter of each PSD plot.

Approximately 5 minutes, i.e. immediately prior to needle insertion until Botulinum toxin (BTX) delivery and needle withdrawal

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Clinical Score of EMG Change
Time Frame: Approximately 5 minutes, i.e. immediately prior to needle insertion until Botulinum toxin (BTX) delivery and needle withdrawal
Clinician's score of the step change from baseline EMG to 'active' EMG level heard immediately prior to delivery of Botulinum toxin (BTX) from 1-5. Value from 1 = no significant step change heard, to 5 = a very clear step change heard.
Approximately 5 minutes, i.e. immediately prior to needle insertion until Botulinum toxin (BTX) delivery and needle withdrawal
Clinical Score of Needle Placement Accuracy
Time Frame: Approximately 5 minutes, i.e. immediately prior to needle insertion until Botulinum toxin (BTX) delivery and needle withdrawal
Clinician's score of their confidence in accurate needle placement with respect to the target muscle. Given as a percentage, a higher score indicates more confidence in accurate needle placement.
Approximately 5 minutes, i.e. immediately prior to needle insertion until Botulinum toxin (BTX) delivery and needle withdrawal
Clinical Score of EMG Quality.
Time Frame: Approximately 5 minutes, i.e. immediately prior to needle insertion until Botulinum toxin (BTX) delivery and needle withdrawal
Clinician's score of overall quality of the EMG signal heard during the procedure. A higher score indicates better quality of EMG signal, and is quantified as 1 to 5, where: 1 indicates signal not present and 5 indicates excellent quality EMG signal.
Approximately 5 minutes, i.e. immediately prior to needle insertion until Botulinum toxin (BTX) delivery and needle withdrawal
Post-treatment Angle of Deviation
Time Frame: 2 weeks
Change in participant's angle of deviation following treatment, measured in prism dioptres.
2 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Tristan G Payne, PhD, Liverpool University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

  • Pinheiro, J. & Bates, D. (2000) Mixed-Effects Models in S and S-PLUS. Statistics and Computing. New York, NY, USA: Springer-Verlag

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

February 20, 2019

Primary Completion (Actual)

May 30, 2019

Study Completion (Actual)

May 30, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 16, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 27, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

March 29, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

July 18, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 1, 2022

Last Verified

January 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Strabismus

3
Subscribe