The RIPPLE AT-PLUS Study

Isthmus Guided vs Anatomical Linear Ablation in the Treatment of Scar Related Atrial Tachycardia

Atrial tachycardia is a symptomatic arrhythmia, for which an effective treatment is a catheter ablation procedure. The goal of the Ripple AT-Plus study is to evaluate two methods of performing catheter ablation for atrial tachycardia. The main outcome assessed during the study is long-term recurrence of atrial tachycardia following the catheter ablation procedure.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Catheter based mapping of the electrical signals in the heart during atrial tachycardia can identify areas that require ablation in order to treat the arrhythmia. There are numerous methods by which to map atrial tachycardia. Isthmus guided ablation using Ripple Mapping is one such method, and has recently been demonstrated to improve diagnostic accuracy of mapping and therefore improve acute procedural outcomes (termination of the tachycardia).

However, it is not known if improved acute procedural outcomes translate into long-term benefits for patients. At present, the recurrence rate following atrial tachycardia ablation is near 30%. We hypothesise that isthmus guided ablation using Ripple Mapping can reduce long-term recurrence following ablation as improved diagnostic accuracy of mapping can lead to more targeted, less extensive, ablation.

Patients referred for catheter ablation of atrial tachycardia will be randomised to undergo the procedure by isthmus targeted approach using Ripple Mapping or conventional approach using local activation time. Otherwise, the catheters used to perform the mapping and ablation will be the same in both groups. After the procedure, follow up will occur at 1 year with a further Holter Montior. Any arrhythmia recurrence will be documented and the two arms will be compared for acute success, 12 month success, ablation required and procedure time.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

201

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • London, United Kingdom, W12 0HS
        • Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust
      • London, United Kingdom, L14 3PE
        • Liverpool Heart & Chest Hospital
      • Newcastle, United Kingdom, NE7 7DN
        • Freeman Hospital, The Newcastle Upon Tyne NHS Foundation Trust

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 80 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Referred for catheter ablation of AT by the direct care team, based on clinical indication.
  2. Male or female, aged >18 years old.
  3. Able to consent for recruitment to the trial and the catheter ablation procedure.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Contraindication to catheter ablation as deemed by the clinical team.
  2. Typical atrial flutter or AF on ECG.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Isthmus targeted approach using Ripple Mapping
Intervention: Isthmus targeted approach using Ripple Mapping catheter ablation of atrial tachycardia.
Ripple Mapping is used to map the atrial tachycardia mechanism. Using the scar thresholding technique the Ripple Map is interpreted and catheter ablation directed to the site of the heart identified as putative to the arrhythmia mechanism. All ablation lesions are confirmed to have conduction block across them using Ripple Mapping. This can include lesions created at previous ablation procedures.
Active Comparator: Conventional Mapping
Intervention: conventional catheter ablation of atrial tachycardia.
Conventional activation mapping is used to map the atrial tachycardia mechanism. The resultant (activation) map is interpreted and ablation directed to the site of the heart identified as putative to the arrhythmia mechanism. All ablation lesions are confirmed to have conduction block across them using conventional mapping. This can include lesions created at previous ablation procedures.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Atrial arrhythmia recurrence
Time Frame: 12 months
Any confirmed episode of atrial arrhythmia (>30 seconds on Holter or 12 lead ECG) occurring in the 12 months after catheter ablation.
12 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Acute success during the catheter ablation procedure by the first ablation set.
Time Frame: Procedure.
Atrial tachycardia termination (acute success) during ablation delivered to only target the diagnosed AT mechanism by the mapping approach used (first ablation set).
Procedure.
Acute success during the catheter ablation procedure without the need of entrainment.
Time Frame: Procedure.
Entrainment not required to confirm or exclude the diagnosis made by 3D electroanatomic mapping methods.
Procedure.
Procedure failure.
Time Frame: Procedure.
Inability to terminate atrial tachycardia during the catheter ablation procedure, requiring external electrical cardioversion to achieve sinus rhythm.
Procedure.
Total procedure time.
Time Frame: Procedure.
Procedure time measured from initiation of intracardiac mapping to catheter removal from the body.
Procedure.
Ablation required
Time Frame: Procedure.
Ablation required, measured using pre-defined ablation index or ablation line length.
Procedure.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

August 16, 2022

Primary Completion (Estimated)

April 1, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

April 1, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 12, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 12, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

April 16, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

September 25, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 22, 2025

Last Verified

September 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe