Evaluating Motivation and Reward Mechanisms and Brain Substrates in Adults With Obesity

July 27, 2021 updated by: Roger McIntyre, Brain and Cognition Discovery Foundation

Evaluating Motivation and Reward Mechanisms and Brain Substrates in Adults With Obesity: Further Evidence That Obesity Affects Physical and Mental Health

Anhedonia and abnormalities in reward behavior are core features of overweight/obesity (OW), a highly prevalent condition within MDD populations, and is independently associated with reward disturbances. The investigators therefore aim to investigate the brain substrates subserving reward and motivation in adults with overweight/obesity.

The primary aim of this pilot study is to determine whether associations exist between obesity and decreased performance on the respective motivation/reward paradigms.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

Herein, the investigators are primarily interested in three overlapping, yet distinct aspects, of anhedonia. The investigators are primarily interested in motivation, reward valuation, and reward learning towards addressing the measurement of each of these respective subdomains, eligible participants will complete validated gold standard measures (i.e. the Effort Expenditure for Rewards Task (EEfRT) (reward valuation), Probabilistic Reward Task (PRT) (reward learning), and the Monetary Incentive Delay (MID) task (reward anticipation)).

Twenty adults with overweight/obesity will complete all tasks at a single visit with two of the tasks being completed prior to MRI and one of the tasks (i.e. EEfRT) will be completed during MRI acquisition.

The primary aim of this pilot study is to determine whether associations exist between obesity and decreased performance on the respective motivation/reward paradigms. In addition, associations between performance on reward tasks and functional connectivity, as measured by MRI and DTI, a secondary objective is to ascertain whether associations exist between performance on the motivation reward tasks and gold standard measures of food intake (i.e. food diary) and energy expenditure (i.e. calorimetry).

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

12

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Ontario
      • Mississauga, Ontario, Canada, L5C 4E7
        • Canadian Rapid Treatment Centre of Excellence

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 65 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

Participants will be identified at the Brain and Cognition Discovery Foundation (BCDF). Twenty subjects between the ages of 18-65 years with obesity, will be enrolled. All patients will be assessed for concurrent psychiatric disorders (e.g. mood disorders) and will meet DSM-V criteria for either: major depressive disorder (symptomatic or asymptomatic in any phase of the illness) or bipolar disorder I/II (symptomatic or asymptomatic in any phase of the illness).

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • 18-65 years of age
  • Meeting DSM-V criteria for: (i) Major depressive disorder (symptomatic or asymptomatic in any phase of the illness) or (ii) bipolar disorder I/II (symptomatic or asymptomatic in any phase of the illness)
  • Ability to provide written and informed consent
  • Obesity 30 kg/m2
  • Weight under 440lbs
  • Shoulder-to-shoulder width under 60 cm

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Age below 18 or above 65
  • Use of benzodiazepines or consumption of alcohol within 12 hours of assessments
  • Abuse of marijuana
  • Physical, cognitive, or language impairments sufficient to adversely affect data derived from assessments
  • Diagnosed reading disability or dyslexia
  • Clinically significant learning disorder by history
  • History of moderate or severe traumatic brain injury
  • Other neurological disorders, or unstable systemic medical diseases
  • Pregnancy and post-partum period
  • Presence of any contra-indications for MRI
  • Weight above 440lbs
  • Shoulder-to-shoulder width greater than 60 cm.

All subjects will be consented prior to initiating the study; >45 BMI; suicidality as determined by clinical discretion

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Major Depressive Disorder or Bipolar Disorder
All eligible participants will be included in this single study arm.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Effort Expenditure for Rewards Task (EEfRT)
Time Frame: 1 day
The EEfRT task is a behavioural paradigm that is used to investigate the subject's effort-based decision-making. Subjects are presented with a series of repeated trials wherein they must choose between performing a hard task or an easy task in order to receive monetary compensation (subject's will receive greater compensation for completing the hard task and less compensation for completing the easy task). By presenting the subject with different probability levels for reward receipt, the objective is to examine the extent to which the relationship between motivation (i.e., anhedonia) and effort-based decision-making is modulated by perceived reward magnitude.
1 day
Monetary Incentive Delay (MID) Task
Time Frame: 1 day
The MID is a behavioural paradigm that assesses the basis of anticipation and consumption of reward and punishment. Each run of the MID task consists of approximately 72 trials. The types of cues presented include: circles (indicating the potential to win money i.e., gain cue), squares (indicating the potential to lose money i.e., loss cue), and a triangle (indicating no money will be won or lost i.e., neutral cue). A cue is presented for 500 ms, followed by a fixation cross (2,000 to 2,500 ms) and then the target square (160 to 260 ms), during which the participant is instructed to press a button as quickly as possible to win or avoid losing money. A feedback screen (1,650 ms), in which the top number indicates the amount of money won or lost during that trial, and the bottom number indicates the participant's total amount, is presented at the end of each trial.
1 day
Probablistic Reward Task (PRT)
Time Frame: 1 day
The PRT is a behavioural paradigm that measures response bias and sensitivity to reward under variable conditions. In this task, a signal detection approach is used, whereby subjects must discriminate between two non-ambiguous stimuli displayed rapidly on a computer screen in order to receive a monetary reward. Unbeknownst to the subjects, correct identification of one stimulus is reinforced three times more frequently than the other stimulus. Under these experimental circumstances, healthy subjects reliably develop a response bias for the stimulus that is reinforced more frequently, regardless of which stimulus was actually presented. Thus, reward responsiveness assessed in this task reflects the rapid shaping of future behavioral choices based on prior reinforcement experiences.
1 day

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
MRI/DTI
Time Frame: 1 day

The secondary outcome will be the association between the EEfRT and function reciprocity of the reward circuit/cognitive control network as measured by MRI/DTI.

Subjects will be scanned using a 3.0-Tesla Signa HDx scanner with an 8-channel phased-array receiver coil consisting of a structural and functional neuroimaging, comprising:

  1. Whole-brain 3-D T1-weighted Inversion-Recovery prepared Fast Spoiled Gradient-Echo anatomical scan
  2. Whole-brain, T2*-weighted BOLD echo planar imaging during awake resting state
  3. Three runs of whole-brain, T2*-weighted BOLD EPI series during task-based reward paradigm.

Graph theoretical analysis will be used to assess functional connectivity of the default mode network, cognitive control network, affect network and reward network.

Associations between obesity and alterations in functional connectivity will be the outcome of interest.

1 day

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

October 30, 2019

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 15, 2020

Study Completion (Actual)

December 15, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 25, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 3, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

May 7, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

July 29, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 27, 2021

Last Verified

July 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Obesity

3
Subscribe