A Social Emotion Regulation Intervention in MS

May 4, 2021 updated by: Kessler Foundation
The current project will examine effectiveness of an intervention based on the concept of the social regulation of emotion. The intervention is designed to improve well-being in individuals with MS by leveraging participants' existing social support. Effectiveness will be tested on a sample of 42 individuals with MS, half of whom will receive the intervention and half of which will receive an inactive control. Investigators will document changes resulting from treatment on self-reported levels of stress, depression, and quality of life. Intervention evaluation will expand scientific knowledge of emotion regulation disruption in MS, and potentially identify a novel and highly efficient means of treatment.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a progressive and debilitating neurological disease which not only affects a patient's physical health, but also adversely affects their mental health. Depressed mood is common in MS, and poor mental health in individuals with MS has wide-ranging consequences on social relationships and community integration. The preponderance of negative emotions and sparsity of positive emotions in MS are attributable in part to ineffective emotion regulation strategies. Thus, the clinical trial seeks to evaluate the effectiveness of an intervention which instructs individuals on using the social regulation of emotion.

The social regulation of emotion occurs when a one's emotional state benefits from an interaction with another person, such as when seeking comfort from a trusted friend. The current intervention was designed to leverage existing social relationships for emotional support in a manner which should strengthen the perception of social support and also reinforce existing relationships. The primary goal of this trial is to examine changes in mental well-being after treatment.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

42

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • New Jersey
      • East Hanover, New Jersey, United States, 07936
        • Kessler Foundation

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 65 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Multiple Sclerosis diagnosis
  • English language fluency

Exclusion Criteria:

  • currently taking steroids or benzodiazepines
  • within 30 days of an exacerbation
  • history of substance abuse
  • diagnosis of bipolar, schizophrenia, epilepsy, stroke

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Basic Science
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Experimental
Participants in the experimental group will receive training in utilizing social regulation of emotion strategies in an individualized format. They will meet with an interventionist for 5 weeks (1 in-person session and 4 telephone sessions) for 1-1.5 hours each week, and keep a journal documenting their emotion challenges and regulation strategy use.
Participants will work one-on-one with an interventionist to develop goals (in the form of implementation intentions) to develop social emotion regulation strategies to combat frequent emotional challenges.
Other: Control
Participants in the control group will not receive training in utilizing social regulation of emotion strategies. While they will still meet with the interventionist on the same schedule and for approximately the same length of time, they will simply be asked to report the emotion regulation strategies that they naturally employ. They will also keep a journal documenting their emotion challenges and regulation strategy use.
Participants will work one-on-one with an interventionist to report on their frequent emotional challenges, and report the emotion regulation strategies that they frequently use to combat them.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Well-being: Depression
Time Frame: Scores will be assessed at two time-points, baseline (week 1) and post-intervention (week 6)
Change in scores on a self-report questionnaire of depression (the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale, a 20-item scale with higher scores indicating greater depression)
Scores will be assessed at two time-points, baseline (week 1) and post-intervention (week 6)
Well-being: Stress
Time Frame: Scores will be assessed at two time-points, baseline (week 1) and post-intervention (week 6)
Change in scores on a self-report questionnaire of stress (the Perceived Stress Scale, a 10-item scale with higher scores reflecting higher stress)
Scores will be assessed at two time-points, baseline (week 1) and post-intervention (week 6)
Well-being: Quality of life
Time Frame: Scores will be assessed at two time-points, baseline (week 1) and post-intervention (week 6)
Change in scores on a self-report questionnaire of quality of life (the Satisfaction with Life Scale, a five item scale where higher scores reflect higher satisfaction)
Scores will be assessed at two time-points, baseline (week 1) and post-intervention (week 6)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Perceived social support
Time Frame: Scores will be assessed at two time-points, baseline (week 1) and post-intervention (week 6)
Change in scores on a self-report questionnaire of perceived social support (the Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support, a 12-item scale where higher scores reflect greater support)
Scores will be assessed at two time-points, baseline (week 1) and post-intervention (week 6)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Katie Lancaster, PhD, Kessler Foundation

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

July 9, 2019

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

July 9, 2021

Study Completion (Anticipated)

July 9, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 13, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 14, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

May 16, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 7, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 4, 2021

Last Verified

May 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

Deidentified Individual participant data that underlie publication in an article will be shared.

IPD Sharing Time Frame

Immediately following publication. No end date.

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

Any purpose

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Multiple Sclerosis

Clinical Trials on Social Emotion Regulation Strategy Development

3
Subscribe