Antimicrobial Stewardship Interventions in a Hospital Setting

December 1, 2022 updated by: Thomas Tängdén, Uppsala University

A Randomized Antimicrobial Stewardship Trial in a Hospital Setting

The emerging crisis of multidrug-resistant bacteria is accelerated by a massive overuse and misuse of antibiotics. It has been estimated that 50% of antibiotic prescriptions are inappropriate. Antibiotic interventions to improve prescribing patterns have been successfully implemented in primary care in Sweden and other countries. However, much of the last-resort antibiotics are used in hospitals in which decisions on therapy for bacterial infections are more complex. In this project we will explore the appropriateness of antibiotic prescribing in a hospital setting and measures to improve the quality of antimicrobial therapy. Antimicrobial stewardship interventions will be conducted at selected hospital departments using prospective audit and feedback in a multifaceted and cross-disciplinary approach. The intervention effects on antibiotic consumption, appropriateness of prescriptions, patient outcome and emergence of resistance will be evaluated, and a financial cost-effectiveness analysis will be performed.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Background: In this project we will address the issue of inappropriate antibiotic prescribing in a hospital setting using a systematic and cross-disciplinary approach. We believe that a substantial reduction in antibiotic use and a significant improvement in prescribing patterns can be achieved, which will benefit the patients by reducing the risks of side effects such as antibiotic-induced Clostridium difficile enteritis.

Aim: The aim of this study is to implement and evaluate antibiotic interventions at targeted hospital wards.

Method: Hospital wards will be randomised to one of two antimicrobial stewardship intervention arms stratified by specialty (medicine or surgery). Prospective audit and feedback is a core intervention strategy in both arms.

Statistics: Interrupted time-series analysis (ITS) will be used for the primary endpoint; volume of antimicrobial prescribing. Monthly baseline data at least five years prior to start of the intervention and a during a follow-up period of at least 12 months after end of the intervention period will be used to assess immediate and sustained effects.

Endpoints and outcomes:

  • Primary endpoint is reduction in antibiotic use, days of antibiotic therapy (DOTs)/100 patient days
  • Secondary endpoints include outcome measures for quantity of antibiotic use, appropriateness of prescriptions, clinical and microbiological outcome and cost-effectiveness.

Data on antibiotic use and trends in prescriptions of key antibiotics will be obtained from hospital pharmacies. Data on duration of hospitalization, patient mortality, re-admissions and side effects including antibiotic-associated Clostridium difficile enteritis will be extracted from the medical records to assess potential impact on patient outcome caused by the intervention. Data on emergence of resistance during therapy and general trends in resistance epidemiology will be recorded. The outcome assessment will include a survey to participating physicians on the value different aspects of the stewardship intervention in their daily care of patients with infections. A cost-effectiveness analysis of the intervention will be performed.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

1312

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Uppsala, Sweden
        • Uppsala University Hospital
      • Ystad, Sweden
        • Ystads lasarett

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Randomization to intervention arms is performed on ward level.

Eligibility criteria:

- Surgical or medical wards

Patient level (too be included in the outcome analyses)

Inclusion Criteria:

  • At least 18 years of age
  • Ongoing antimicrobial therapy on a study ward
  • Signed informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients in palliative care with very short life expectancy
  • Patients from another county than study site

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Infectious diseases physician led

Prospective audit and feedback of antimicrobial therapy by infectious disease physicians twice weekly

Also including standard of care

  • infectious disease consultant on demand
  • hospital antimicrobial stewardship program as usual (education, general information, feedback on prescribing)
Prospective audit and feedback of antimicrobial therapy at hospital wards, by interventions performed by infectious diseases specialists alone or using a team-based approach.
Experimental: Multiprofessional team

Prospective audit and feedback of antimicrobial therapy by infectious disease physicians once weekly, ward clinical pharmacists thrice weekly and engagement of ward nurses in the stewardship intervention

Also including standard of care

  • infectious disease consultant on demand
  • hospital antimicrobial stewardship program as usual (education, general information, feedback on prescribing)
Prospective audit and feedback of antimicrobial therapy at hospital wards, by interventions performed by infectious diseases specialists alone or using a team-based approach.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change and trends in days of antibiotic therapy (DOT)/100 patient days
Time Frame: 7 years
Monthly DOT of antibiotics per 100 patient days on ward level assessed 5 y pre-intervention and 1 y post-intervention. Data will be analysed using interrupted time series analysis to assess immediate changes following implementation and comparison of trends before and after the intervention.
7 years

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Days of defined daily doses (DDDs)/100 patient days
Time Frame: 12 months
Overall days of therapy per 100 patient days (PD) on the ward level
12 months
Treatment duration (Days per treatment period overall)
Time Frame: 12 months
Overall days per treatment episode. A treatment episode is defined as antimicrobial treatment not interrupted by more than one calendar day.
12 months
30-d mortality
Time Frame: 12 months
All cause 30-d mortality
12 months
In-hospital mortality
Time Frame: 12 months
All-cause in-hospital mortality
12 months
Hospital readmission within 30 d after discharge
Time Frame: 12 months
Unplanned hospital readmission within 30 d after discharge
12 months
Hospital readmission due to relapse of infection within 30 d after discharge
Time Frame: 12 months
Unplanned hospital readmission due to relapse of infection within 30 d after discharge
12 months
Hospital length of stay (LOS)
Time Frame: 12 months
Hospital length of stay per admission
12 months
Intensive Care Unit (ICU) transfer
Time Frame: 12 months
Proportion of admissions transferred to ICU after initial non-ICU admission
12 months
Guideline compliance
Time Frame: 12 months
Proportion of patients treated where antimicrobial therapy was in compliance with local guideline, or in absence of local guideline national guideline
12 months
De-escalation or shift to targeted therapy
Time Frame: 12 months
Proportion of patients where de-escalation or shift to targeted antibiotic therapy occurred within 72 hours after initiation of treatment
12 months
Intravenous to oral switch
Time Frame: 12 months
Proportion of patients where intravenous antibiotics was shifted to oral therapy within 5 days (if appropriate)
12 months
Appropriate diagnostic examinations
Time Frame: 12 months
Proportion of patients with appropriate diagnostic examinations performed, according to local guidelines, or in the absence of local guidelines national guidelines
12 months
Dose adjustment for renal function within 48 h after initiation of antimicrobial therapy at admission
Time Frame: 12 months
Dose adjustment of antimicrobial after the most critical phase of the infection
12 months
Dose adjustment for renal function when initiating antimicrobial therapy in a non-acute situation
Time Frame: 12 months
Proportion of antimicrobial prescription in non-acute situations where dosing was according to renal function
12 months
Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM)
Time Frame: 12 months
Proportion of patients where TDM was used, when applicable according to local guideline
12 months
Drug-drug interactions (DDI)
Time Frame: 12 months
Important DDI taken into account when prescribing antimicrobial therapy
12 months
Incidence of Clostridium difficile infections (CDI)
Time Frame: 12 months
Incidence of healthcare-facility onset CDI denominated by 10 000 PD and admission
12 months
Incidence of multidrug-resistant organisms (MDRO)
Time Frame: 12 months
Incidence of clinical cultures with multidrug resistant organisms (methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), Extended spectrum beta-lactamase producing Enterobacteriaceae (ESBL-E), carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae (CPE), vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE), multidrug resistant P. aeruginosa) denominated per 1000 PD and admissions
12 months
Costs of administered antimicrobials
Time Frame: 12 months
Costs of administered antimicrobials (overall and by class) per admission and per patient receiving antibiotics
12 months
Costs of the intervention
Time Frame: 12 months
Total costs of the intervention
12 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Collaborators

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Thomas Tängdén, MD, Phd, Uppsala University Hospital

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

July 1, 2019

Primary Completion (Actual)

July 31, 2022

Study Completion (Actual)

July 31, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 20, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 25, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

June 28, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

December 2, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 1, 2022

Last Verified

December 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Infectious Disease

Clinical Trials on Implementation of prospective audit and feedback stewardship interventions to reduce unnecessary use of antimicrobials and improve quality of prescriptions

Subscribe