Nebulized Budesonide Combined With Systemic Corticosteroid in Acute Severe Asthma

July 9, 2019 updated by: Soudani MARGHLI, MD, University of Monastir

Nebulized Budesonide Combined With Systemic Corticosteroid in Acute Severe Asthma Managed in the Emergency Department: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Our study is a prospective double-blind randomized study performed in the Emergency Department (ED). The objective of our study was to demonstrate the additive effect of high and repeated doses of inhaled budesonide combined with the standard treatment of acute asthma in adult managed in the ED

Study Overview

Status

Unknown

Conditions

Detailed Description

Patients were included in a double-blind, randomized into one of two groups. The experimental group received a first nebulization of 5 mg of terbutaline (Bricanyl®, AstraZeneca : solution of 5mg/ 2 ml ) in association with 0.5 mg of ipratropium bromide (Ipratropium®, AGUETTANT, solution of 0.5 mg/ 2 ml) and 0.5 mg of budesonide (Pulmicort®, AstraZeneca, solution of 0.5 mg/2 ml) followed by repetitive nebulization of 5 mg of terbutaline with 0.5 mg of budesonide at 20, 40, 60 and 120 min. The control group received a first nebulization of 5 mg of terbutaline in association with 0.5 mg of ipratropium bromide and 2 ml of normal saline followed by a repetitive nebulization of 5 mg de terbutaline with 2 ml of normal saline at 20, 40, 60 and 120 min (Figure 1). The placebo and the budesonide were prepared by the pharmacist. All patients received hydrocortisone hemisuccinate (100 mg i.v.) and O2 (7 l/ min) via a nebulizer (Mini nebulizer 40-115510; Peters, France).

Measure The following parameters were measured in each patient immediately before starting the treatment and at 30 minute intervals for 3 hours after presentation: peak expiratory flow (PEF), respiratory rate (RR), heart rate (HR), dyspnea scale, systolic and diastolic blood pressure. PEF was measured with peak flow meter (mini-Wright; Clement Clarke; Harlow, UK). The highest of three values was recorded. HR was measured from continuous monitor. Dyspnea was assessed by the patient's own sensation of respiratory difficulty with a value assigned on a scale of 0 to 3, in which 0 denoted absent, 1 mild, 2 moderate, and 3 severe. At the end of the treatment, the patient was asked to indicate the presence or absence of each of five symptoms: palpitations, tremor, anxiety, headache, and dry mouth. Also, an interviewer determined the duration of symptoms before presentation, which specifically included how long the patient had been wheezing and shorter of breath than usual; a decline in the PEF, if available, was considered. The occurrence of a worsening of ventilator status requiring mechanical ventilation led to interrupt the study protocol. The decision to discharge or admit a patient was made at the end of the protocol (180 minutes) by a senior ED staff without knowledge of previous patient group allocation. Although some patients met discharge criteria during the study, none were discharged until the end of the protocol. Patients were discharged from the ED according to the following criteria: if accessory-muscle use disappeared, if wheezing was judged minimal to completely resolved, if they were free of dyspnea, and if PEF was more than 60% of predicted value. Physicians prescribed oral prednisone (40 mg for 7 days) for all discharged patients.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

60

Phase

  • Phase 1

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Monastir, Tunisia, 5000
        • Recruiting
        • University of Monastir
        • Contact:
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Soudani Marghli, Professor

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 50 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • acute asthma
  • peak expiratory flow (PEF) rate less than 50% of predicted value
  • one or more of the following features were present: accessory muscle activity, a heart rate greater than 110 beats/minute, a respiratory rate greater than 25 breaths/minute, a limited ability to speak
  • written informed consent obtained

Exclusion Criteria:

  • temperature higher than 38°C
  • history of cardiac, hepatic, renal, or other medical disease
  • pregnant

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Budesonide group
The experimental group received a first nebulization of 5 mg of terbutaline(solution of 5mg/ 2 ml ) in association with 0.5 mg of ipratropium bromide (solution of 0.5 mg/ 2 ml) and 0.5 mg of budesonide (solution of 0.5 mg/2 ml) followed by repetitive nebulization of 5 mg of terbutaline with 0.5 mg of budesonide at 20, 40, 60 and 120 min. All patients received hydrocortisone hemisuccinate (100 mg i.v.) and O2 (7 l/ min) via a nebulizer.
first nebulization of 0.5 mg of budesonide in association with terbutaline and ippratropium bromide followed by repetitive nebulization of 5 mg of terbutaline with 0.5 mg of budesonide at 20, 40, 60 and 120 min.
Placebo Comparator: normal saline
The control group received a nebulization of 2 ml normal saline at baseline, 20, 40, 60 and 120 min as placebo comparator in association with nebulized terbutaline . All patients received hydrocortisone hemisuccinate (100 mg i.v.) and O2 (7 l/ min) via a nebulizer.
first nebulization of 2ml of normal saline as placebo comparator in association with terbutaline and ippratropium bromide followed by repetitive nebulization of 5 mg of terbutaline with 2 ml of normal saline at 20, 40, 60 and 120 min.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
admission rate
Time Frame: 3 hours
The decision to discharge or admit a patient was made at the end of the protocol (180 minutes)
3 hours

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Peak expiratory flow
Time Frame: 3 hours
Peak expiratory flow (L/min) was measured in each patient immediately before starting the treatment and at 30 minute intervals for 3 hours after presentation.
3 hours
respiratory rate was measured in each patient immediately before starting the treatment and at 30 minute intervals for 3 hours after presentation.
Time Frame: 3 hours
respiratory rate
3 hours
dyspnea scale
Time Frame: 3 hours
Dyspnea was assessed by the patient's own sensation of respiratory difficulty with a value assigned on a scale of 0 to 3, in which 0 denoted absent, 1 mild, 2 moderate, and 3 severe. was measured in each patient immediately before starting the treatment and at 30 minute intervals for 3 hours after presentation:
3 hours
Hear rate
Time Frame: 3 hours
Heart rate was measured in each patient immediately before starting the treatment and at 30 minute intervals for 3 hours after presentation.
3 hours
tremor
Time Frame: 3 hours
incidence of tremor
3 hours
dry mouth
Time Frame: 3 hours
incidence of dry mouth
3 hours
palpitation
Time Frame: 3 hours
incidence of palpitation
3 hours
headache
Time Frame: 3 hours
incidence of headache
3 hours

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Soudani Marghli, Professor, University of Monastir Tunisia

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

May 20, 2019

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

December 20, 2019

Study Completion (Anticipated)

May 20, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 29, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 9, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

July 11, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

July 11, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 9, 2019

Last Verified

July 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe